Deformation and Failure of Ice Cover under Compression
Conference paper
Abstract
Two types of ice cover deformation processes have been studied: compression of ice fields made up of small floes and compression of two identical ice sheets. While these processes have differences, they also show common features. It is suggested that the ice cover deformation should be described as a single process with different phases. In this context, the fact that an ice cover can have several different morphological features (rafted ice, ridges, rubble) is not an indication of different processes, but an indication of different stages in a single process.
Keywords
Small Floe Floe Field Pusher Plate Ship Laboratory Rubble Field
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Abdelnour, R. and Croasdale, K. 1986. Ice forces associated with ridge building: Model tests and results compared with theoretical models. Proc. of IAHR Ice Symp. Vol.3, 227–245.Google Scholar
- Hansen, E.H. and Tuhkuri, J. 1997. Ice tank tests on marginal ice zone rheology. Proc. of the 16th Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Vol. IV, 469–475.Google Scholar
- Hopkins, M.A. 1994. On the ridging of intact lead ice. J. Geophys. Res., 99, 16351–16360.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hopkins, M.A. 1998. Four stages of pressure ridging. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 21883–21891.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hopkins, M.A. and Tuhkuri J. 1999. The compression of floating ice fields. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 15815–15825.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hopkins, M.A., Tuhkuri J. and Lensu, M. 1999. Rafting and ridging of thin ice sheets. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 13605–13613.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kankaanpää, P. 1997. Distribution, morphology and structure of sea ice pressure ridges in the Baltic Sea. Fennia, 175, 139–240.Google Scholar
- Kovacs, A. and Sodhi, D.S. 1980. Shore ice pile-up and ride-up: Field observations, models, theoretical analyses. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2, 209–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Løset, S. 1994. Discrete element modelling of a broken ice field — Part I & II. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 22, 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Løset, S. and Timco, G.W. 1992. Laboratory testing of a flexible boom for ice management. Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf. Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 289–295.Google Scholar
- Parmerter, R.R. 1975. A model of simple rafting in sea ice. J. Geophys. Res., 80, 1948–1952.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Parmerter, R.R. and Coon, M.D. 1972. Model of pressure ridge formation in sea ice. J. Geophys. Res., 77, 6565–6575.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sayed, M. and Frederking, R.M.W. 1988. Model of ice rubble pileup. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 114, 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shen, H.H., Hibler, W.D., and Leppäranta, M. 1986. On applying granular flow theory to a deforming broken ice field. Acta Mechanica, 63, 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Timco, G.W. and Sayed. M. 1986. Model tests of the ridge-building process of ice. Proc. of IAHR Ice Symp. Vol.1, 591–602.Google Scholar
- Tuhkuri, J. and Lensu, M. 1997. Ice tank tests on rafting of a broken ice field. Helsinki University of Technology, Ship Laboratory, Report M-218. 73 p.Google Scholar
- Tuhkuri, J. and Lensu, M. 1998. Ice tank tests on ridging of non-uniform ice sheets. Helsinki University of Technology, Ship Laboratory, Report M-236. 130 p.Google Scholar
- Tuhkuri, J., Lensu, M. and Hopkins, M. 1998. Laboratory and field studies on ridging of an ice sheet. Proc. of IAHR Ice Symp. Vol.1, 397–404.Google Scholar
- Tuhkuri, J., Lensu, M. and Saarinen, S. 1999. Laboratory and field studies on mechanics of ice ridge formations. Proc. of the 15th Int. Conf. on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Vo13, 1118–1129.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001