Advertisement

Some Criticisms of Behaviorism

  • Roger Schnaitter
Part of the Studies in Cognitive Systems book series (COGS, volume 22)

Abstract

Although rooted in the nineteenth century and before, it was not until 1913, with Watson’s publication of his famous paper, “Psychology as the behaviorist views it,” that behaviorism gained a name and recognizable public identity. Since this inception behaviorism has been subjected to a more or less continuous stream of criticism. During the roughly two decade period of the late 1950s through the late 1970s this criticism assumed the proportions of a full-blown assault when in its headier moments an almost Manichean construction of theoretical debate arose. The more energetic rhetoric of this period seemed less thoughtful than moral, with the purpose of bringing about the destruction of the behaviorist evil and the hegemony of the cognitive good. Following this period of high fervor the critique of behaviorism has over the past two decades subsided significantly, the critics for a variety of reasons having come to the opinion that the battle had been won. The dominant view — that is, the view among the cognitive cognoscenti — now appears to be that behaviorism has been sufficiently marginalized to pose no continuing threat. Consequently what one does tend to find in the current literature is the odd historical reference, to Chomsky or whomever, rather than anything much new. The period of vigorous criticism has substantially passed.

Keywords

Verbal Behavior Operant Conditioning Causal Structure Intentional State Serial Order 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andresen, J. T. (1990) Skinner and Chomsky thirty years later. Historiographia Linguistica, 17, 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Reprinted in (1991) The Behavior Analyst, 14, 49–60.Google Scholar
  3. Baum, W. M. and Heath, J. L. (1992). Behavioral explanations and intentional explanations in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1312–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackmore, J. T. (1972) Ernst Mach: His work, life, and influence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brentano, F. (1874) Psychologie vom empirischen standpunkt. Vienna.Google Scholar
  6. Chisholm, R. (1957). Perceiving: A philosophical study. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, N. (1959) Review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.Google Scholar
  8. Day, W. F. (1969) Radical behaviorism in reconciliation with phenomenology. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Day, W. F. (1980) The historical antecedents of contemporary behaviorism. In R. W. Reiber and K. Salzinger (Eds.). Psychology: Theoretical and historical perspectives (pp. 203–262 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Day, W. F. (1983). On the difference between radical and methodological behaviorism. Behaviorism, 11, 89–102.Google Scholar
  11. Dennett, D. (1978) Brainstorms. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  12. Ferster, C. B. and Skinner, B. F. (1958) Schedules of reinforcement. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts.Google Scholar
  13. Flanagan, O. (1988) The science of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fodor, J. (1981) Representations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fodor, J. (1990) A theory of content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gardner, H. (1995) Colorless ideas sleeping furiously. New York Review of Books, 42, 5, 32–38.Google Scholar
  17. Gibson, J. J. (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  18. Haugeland, J. (1981) Mind design. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  19. Hineline, P. N. (1992) A self-interpretive behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1274–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hull, C. (1930) Knowledge and purpose as habit mechanisms. Psychological Review, 36, 498–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hull, C. (1931) Goal attraction and directing ideas conceived as habit phenomena. Psychological Review, 38, 487–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lashley, K. S. (1951) The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress, (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (pp. 112–146 ). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Lee, V. L. (1988) Beyond behaviorism. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. MacCorquodale, K., and Meehl, P. (1948) On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. MacCorquodale, K. (1970) On Chomsky’s review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mach, E. (1883) The science of mechanics. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
  27. McCorkle, M. E., Mercier, D., and Spooner, D. ( 1985, May). The Reno Group: Their methods, analyses and results. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  28. Meehl, P. (1950) On the circularity of the law of effect. Psychological Bulletin, 47, 52–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nagel, E. (1961) The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
  30. Palmer, S., and Kimchi, R. (1986) The information processing approach to cognition. In T. Knapp and L. Robertson (eds.), Approaches to cognition: Contrasts and controversies ( 3777 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Pinker, S. (1994) The language instinct. New York: W. Morrow and Co.Google Scholar
  32. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984) Computation and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Quine, W. V. O. (1960) Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Richelle, M. (1976) Formal analysis and functional analysis of verbal behavior: Notes on the debate between Chomsky and Skinner. Behaviorism, 4, 209–221.Google Scholar
  35. Ringen, J. (1976) Explanation, teleology, and operant behaviorism: A study of the experimental analysis of purposive behavior. Philosophy of Science, 43, 223–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rorty, R. (1979) Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ryle, G. (1948) The concept of mind. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
  38. Schnaitter, R. (1978) Circularity, trans-situationality, and the law of effect. Psychological Record, 28, 353–362.Google Scholar
  39. Schnaitter, R. (1984) Skinner on the “mental” and the “physical”. Behaviorism, 12, 1–14.Google Scholar
  40. Schnaitter, R. (1985) The haunted clockwork: Reflections on Gilbert Ryle’s The concept of mind. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schnaitter, R. (1987) Knowledge as action. In S. Modgil and C. Modgil (Eds.), B. F. Skinner: Consensus and controversy (pp. 57–68 ). Philadelphia, PA: Falmer.Google Scholar
  42. Searle, J. R. (1983) Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Searle, J. R. (1984) Minds, brains and science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Searle, J. R. (1992) The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Simon, H. A. (1982) The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. Skinner, B. F. (1945) The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277, 291–294.Google Scholar
  47. Skinner, B. F. (1957) Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Skinner, B. F. (1971) Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  49. Skinner, B. F. (1974) About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  50. Skinner, B. F. (1976) Farewell, my lovely! Journa of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 25, 2–18.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, L. D. (1986) Behaviorism and logical positivism: A reassessment of the alliance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Stich, S. P. (1983) From folk psychology to cognitive science: The case against belief. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  53. Taylor, C. (1964) The explanation of behaviour. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  54. Todd, J. T., and Morris, E. K. (1992) Case histories in the great power of steady misrepresentation. American Psychologist, 47, 1441–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zuriff, G. E. (1985) Behaviorism: A conceptual reconstruction. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger Schnaitter

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations