Advertisement

The Politics of Chemical Risk Scenarios for Regulatory Policy

  • Willem Halffman
  • Roland Bal
Chapter

Abstract

In conclusion to this volume, we have made an attempt to integrate the papers in order to map different alternatives for the future development of the regulation of chemicals. Rather than drawing up long lists of all the ideas and analyses that are presented, we have tried to digest these into a set of four ‘scenarios’. These scenarios are four sets of coherent choices that could guide the further development of chemical regulation. In this sense they are not to be read as predictions about the regulatory future, they are sketches of possible regulatory futures. As sketches, they only indicate a number of structural lines, not the flesh and bones of specific domains of regulation. Combined with an analysis of the likely developments and tensions in each of these models, they obtain a dynamic component, warranting the term ‘scenarios’.

Keywords

Risk Assessment Member State Regulatory Policy International Expert Reflection Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraham, J. (1994) ‘Negotiation and Accomodation in Expert Medical Risk Assessment and Regulation: An Institutional Analysis of the Benaxoprofen Case’, Policy Sciences 27: 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, C. (1994), ‘Policies to encourage Clean Technologies’, in: R. Socolow, C. Andrews, F. Berkhout, V. Thomas (eds.) Industrial Ecology and Global Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 405–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashford, N.A., C.W. Ryan & C.C. Caldart (1983), ‘Law and Science Policy in Federal Regulation of Formaldehyde’, Science 222: 894–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bal, R. & A. Spit (1994), ‘De Risicopolitiek van Man-made Mineral Fibres’, Tijdschrift voor Toegepaste Arbowetenschap 7: 63–72.Google Scholar
  5. Bijker, W. (1995a) Democratisering van de technologische cultuur, Maastricht.Google Scholar
  6. Bijker, W. (1995b) Of Bicycles, Bakelites and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Technical Change, Cambridge: MIT press.Google Scholar
  7. Brickman, R., S. Jasanoff & T. Ilgen (1985) Controling Chemicals: The Politics of Regulation in Europe and the us, Ithaca: Cornell UP.Google Scholar
  8. Gillespie, B., D. Eva & R. Johnston (1982) ‘Carcinogenic Risk Assessment in the USA and UK: The Case of Aldrin/Dieldrin’, in: B. Barnes & D. Edge (eds.) Science in Context, Milton Keynes: Open University Press; 303–35.Google Scholar
  9. Halffman, W. (1995) ‘The Transformation of Expertise in Two Regulatory Regimes of the EPA’, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  10. Health Council of the Netherlands: Committee on Risk measures and risk assessment (1995) Not All Risks Are Equal, The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands, publ. No. 1995/06.Google Scholar
  11. Jasanoff, S. (1990) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers, Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.Google Scholar
  12. Jepperson, J.R. & J.W. Meyer (1991) ‘The Public Order and the Construction of Formal Organizations’, in: W.W. Powell & P.J. Dimaggio (eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press; 204–31.Google Scholar
  13. Nownes, A.J. (1991) ‘Interest Groups and the Regulation of Pesticides: Congress, Coalitions and Closure’, Policy Sciences 24: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rip, A., T. Misa & J. Schot (1995) Managing Technology in Society, New York and London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Schön, D. & M. Rein (1994) Reframing: Controversy and Reflection in Policy Design, New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  16. Sterrenberg, L. & W. Brandt (1996) Van bestrtjden naar voorkomen: Een visie op duurzame gewasbescherming, Den Haag: Rathenau Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Vogel, D. (1986) National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States, Ithaca: Cornell UP.Google Scholar
  18. Wynne, B. (1984) ‘The Institutional Context of Science, Models, and Policy: The IIASA Energy Study’, Policy Sciences 17: 277–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wynne, B. (1992) ‘Carving out Science (and Politics) in the Regulatory Jungle’, Social Studies of Science 22: 745–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. National Academy of Sciences (1983) Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  21. Wynne, B. (1992) ‘Sheep Farming After Chernobyl: A Case Study in Communicating Scientific Information’, in: B. Lewenstein (ed.) When Science Meets the Public, Washington: AAAS, Committee on Public Understanding of Science and Technology; 43–67. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Willem Halffman
  • Roland Bal

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations