Advertisement

General Introduction

  • Willem Halffman
  • Roland Bal
Chapter

Abstract

This book is the product of a workshop. The workshop The Politics of Chemical Risk was organised with a double agenda in mind. One set of goals was related to the future of chemical hazard regulation in Europe. The other was concerned with an attempt to create communication between natural and social scientists working on or in risk regulation. In this general introduction we first discuss the goals that informed the workshop, as well as this volume. After that, we give a short description of the workshop and the book itself. We do not discuss the chapters: these are discussed in separate introductions, preceding each part of the book.

Keywords

Risk Assessment General Introduction Risk Regulation Health Council Chemical Risk 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brickman, R., S. Jasanoff & T. Ilgen (1985) Controlling Chemicals: The Politics of Regulation in Europe and the United States, Ithaca: Cornell UP.Google Scholar
  2. Cambrosio, A., C. Limoges & E. Hoffman (1992) ‘Expertise as a Network: A Case Study of the Controversies over the Environmental Release of Genetically Modified Organisms’, in: N. Stehr and R.V. Ericson (eds.), The Culture and Power of Knowledge: Inquiries into Contemporary Societies, Berlin: De Gruyter; 341–61.Google Scholar
  3. Gillespie, B. (1979) ‘British “Safety Policy” and Pesticides’, in: R. Johnston & P. Gummett (eds.) Directing Technology: Policies for Promotion and Control, London: Croom Helm; 202–24.Google Scholar
  4. Gillespie, B., D. Eva & R. Johnston (1982) ‘Carcinogenic Risk Assessment in the USA and UK: The Case of Aldrin/Dieldrin’, in: B. Barnes & D. Edge (eds.) Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science, Milton Keynes: Open University Press; 303–335.Google Scholar
  5. Health Council of the Netherlands: Committee on Risk measures and risk assessment (1995), Not All Risks Are Equal, The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands, publ. no. 1995/06.Google Scholar
  6. Jasanoff, S. (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policy Makers, Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.Google Scholar
  7. Jasanoff, S. (1992) ‘Science, Politics, and the Negotiation of Expertise at EPA’, Osiris, 2nd series 7: 195–217.Google Scholar
  8. Landy, M.K., M.J. Roberts & S. Thomas (1990) The Environmental Protection Agency: Asking the Wrong Questions, New York: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
  9. Levidow, L. (1994) ‘De-reifying Risk’, Science as Culture 4: 440–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Limoges, C, A. Cambrosio, D. Charron & B. Longpré (1992), ‘From ecotoxicology to risk assessment in biotechnology: the standardization of microcosms’, paper for the Society for the History of Technology conference, Uppsala, Sweden, August 1992.Google Scholar
  11. Royal Society (1992) Risk: Analysis, Perception and Management. Report of a Royal Society Study Group, London: Royal Society.Google Scholar
  12. Vogel, D. (1986) National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States, Ithaca: Cornell UP.Google Scholar
  13. Wynne, B. (1992) ‘Carving Out Science (and Politics) in the Regulatory Jungle’, Social Studies of Science 22: 745–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Willem Halffman
  • Roland Bal

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations