Compliance with International Environmental Accords

Achievements and Strategies
  • Harold K. Jacobson
  • Edith Brown Weiss
Part of the Environment & Policy book series (ENPO, volume 9)

Abstract

In 1972, the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (UNCHE), held in Stockholm, launched a global effort to protect, preserve, and enhance the environment. International environmental accords — treaties and agreements — were central components of this effort. They became primary instruments for orienting and coordinating the behavior first of states and ultimately of enterprises and individuals, steering behavior away from those activities that were environmentally destructive and toward those that would be environmentally benign. In the two decades that followed the Stockholm conference this emphasis on international environmental accords continued, and in June 1992, at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro, 1992, it was reaffirmed.

Keywords

International Environment Global Environmental Change Democratic Government International Accord Political Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andresen, Steinar, and Jorgen Wettestad (1995) “International Problem-Solving Effectiveness: The Oslo Project Story So Far”. International Environmental Affairs, 7(2): 127–149.Google Scholar
  2. Benedick, Richard Elliot (1991) Ozone Diplomacy: New Directions in Safeguarding the Planet. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chayes, Abram, and Antonia Chandler Chayes (1995) The New Sovereignty. Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Downs, George W., David M. Rocke, and Peter N. Barsoom (1996) “Is the Good News About Compliance Good News About Cooperation?”. International Organization 50 (3): 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Haas, Peter M., Robert O. Keohane, and Marc A. Levy, eds. (1993) Institutions for the Earth: Sources ofInternational Environment Protection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Lang, Winfried, ed. (1996) “The Ozone Treaties and their Influence on the Building of International Environmental Regimes”. Osterreichische Aussenpolitische Dokumentation.Google Scholar
  7. Robinson, Nicholas A., ed. (1993) Agenda 21: Earth’s Action Plan. New York, NY: Oceana Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Sand, Peter H. ed. (1992) The Effectiveness ofInternational Environmental Agreements. Cambridge, Grotius Publications Limited.Google Scholar
  9. United Nations (1992) “Survey of Existing International Agreements and Instruments and Its Follow Up”. Report by the Secretary General of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, A/Conf. 151 /PC/ 103 and Addendum 1.Google Scholar
  10. United States of America, Government Accounting Office (1992) International Environment; International Agreements Are Not Well Monitored. GAO/RCED 92–43.Google Scholar
  11. World Commission on Environment and Development (the Bruntland Commission) (1987) Our Common Future. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harold K. Jacobson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Edith Brown Weiss
    • 3
  1. 1.Political ScienceUniversity of MichiganUSA
  2. 2.Center for Political Studies of the Institute for Social ResearchUSA
  3. 3.Georgetown University Law CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations