The Linear Complementarity Problem

  • Panos M. Pardalos
Chapter
Part of the Mathematics and Its Applications book series (MAIA, volume 275)

Abstract

This paper discusses a number of observations and conclusions drawn from ongoing research into more efficient algorithms for solving nonconvex linear complementarity problems (LCP). We apply interior point approaches and partitioning techniques to classes of problems that can be solved efficiently. Using the potential reduction algorithm, we characterize some classes of problems that can be solved in polynomial time. The same algorithm is used for the solution of problems with a row-sufficient matrix. The algorithm also generates a stationary point for the LCP in fully polynomial approximation time. When the problem data has no structure, we show equivalence of mixed integer programming problems and the linear complementarity problems.

Key words

Linear Complementarity Problem NP-hard Integer Programming Interior Point Methods 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bershchanskii Y.M. and Meerov M.V., The complementarity problem: Theory and Methods of Solution. Automation and Remote Control Vol. 44, No 6, Part I (1983), pp. 687–710.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cottle R.W. and Pang J.S., On solving linear complementarity problems as linear programs. Math. Progr. Study 7 (1978), pp. 88–107.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cottle R.W., Pang J.S. and Venkateswaran V., Sufficient matrices and the linear complementarity problem. Linear Algebra and its Applications 114 /115 (1989), pp. 231–249.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cottle R.W., Pang J.S. and Stone, R.E., The Linear complementarity problem. Academic Press (1992).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cottle R.W. and Dantzig G.B., Complementarity pivot theory of mathematical programming. In: Dantzig G.B. and Veinott A.F., Jr., eds., Mathematics of the Decision Sciences, Part 1 (American Mathematical Society, 1968 ), pp. 115–136.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gupta S. and Pardalos P.M., On a quadratic formulation of linear complementarity problems. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 57, No. 1 (1988), pp. 197–202.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lemke C.E., A survey of complementarity theory. In: Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems: Theory and Applications (edited by Cottle R.W., Giannessi F. and Lions J.L., John Wiley and Sons, New York) (1980) pp. 213–239.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kojima M., Megiddo N. and Ye Y., An interior point potential reduction algorithm for the linear complementarity problem. Math. Progr. 54, No. 3 (1992), pp. 267–279.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kojima M., Mizuno S. and Yoshise A., An OL iteration potential reduction algorithm for linear complementarity problems. Research Report on Information Sciences b-127, Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo, 1988 ).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kojima M., Megiddo N., Noma T. and Yoshise A., A Unified Approach to Interior Point Algorithms for Linear Complementarity Problems. Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences 538 (1991).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mangasarian O.L., Characterization of linear complementarity problems as linear programs. Math. Progr. Study 7 (1978), pp. 213–239.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Megiddo N., A note on the complexity of P-matrix LCP and computing an equilibrium. Research Report 6439, IBM Almaden Research Center (1988).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Murty K.G., Linear complementarity, linear and nonlinear programming Heldermann Verlag, Berlin (1988).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ortega J.M., Numerical analysis, A second course. Academic Press (1972).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pardalos P.M., Parallel search algorithms in global optimization. Applied Mathematics and Computation 29 (1989), pp. 219–229.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pardalos P.M., Linear complementarity problems solvable by integer programming. Optimization 19 (1988), pp. 467–474.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pardalos P.M. and Nagurney A., The integer linear complementarity problem. Intern. J. of Computer Mathematics 31 (1990), pp. 205–214.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pardalos P.M. and Rosen J.B., Global optimization approach to the linear complementarity problem. SIAM J. Scient. Stat. Computing Vol. 9, No. 2 (1988), pp. 341–353.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pardalos P.M. and Rosen J.B., Global optimization: algorithms and applications. Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences 268 (1987).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pardalos P.M., Ye Y., Han C.G., and Kaliski J.A., Solution of P-matrix linear complementarity problems using a potential reduction algorithm, SIAM J. on Matrix Analysis and Applications Vol. 14, No. 4 (1993).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rosen J B, Minimum norm solution to the linear complementarity problem, In: Functional Analysis, Optimization and Mathematical Economics (L.J. Leifman, Ed.) Oxford University Press (1990), pp. 208–216.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ye Y., A further result on the potential reduction algorithm for the P-matrix problem. In: Advances in Optimization and Parallel Computing (P. M. Pardalos Ed.) Elsevier Science Publishers (1992), pp. 310–316.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ye Y., A fully polynomial-time approximation algorithm for computing a stationary point of the general linear complementarity problem. Working Paper, Department of Management Sciences, The University of Iowa (1990).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ye Y. and Pardalos P.M., A class of linear complementarity problems solvable in polynomial time. Linear Algebra and its Applications 152 (1991), pp. 3–17.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Panos M. Pardalos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations