Advertisement

Development of Concepts of Truth and Lying: A Developmental Task

  • J. J. F. ter Laak
Chapter

Abstract

Behaviors and cognitions can be judged using veracity and truthfulness. In this chapter different kinds and perspectives on truth are briefly mentioned. Some of these play a role in psychology as a base for the conception of scientific truth and as a topic for research, for example, how do children acquire a concept of truth. In developmental psychology, there are lifespan models for the description and explanation of the growth of knowledge of the outside world. Strange as it may seem, the development of concepts of truth and especially of lying, and of speaking the truth, as well as lying behavior itself are investigated outwit or separate from these models. Beside these developmental studies, there remains the question as to whether and at what age children are able to report interpersonal behaviors and events in accordance with the truth. This, for example, is of interest to forensic psychologists when interviewing children who are victims and/or witnesses of crimes. These psychologists have made lists of criteria which help determine whether children’s statements are true or untrue. In this contribution, an empirical study will be reported which examines whether two truth criteria, considered important by forensical psychologists, i.e. the amount of details mentioned and spontaneous corrections, are indeed valid truth criteria for 7 and 11 year olds. The concept of developmental task is applied, in order to elaborate on the ability of children to report events and interpersonal behaviors truthfully and accurately. Finally, the concept ‘developmental task’ is considered in the light of some central questions prevalent in developmental psychology.

Keywords

Interpersonal Behavior Developmental Task Overt Behavior Truth Criterion Truth Concept 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bunge, M. (1974). Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Semantics II: Interpretation and Truth (Vol. 2 ). Dordrecht (Holland), Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Cy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bussey, K. (1992). Lying and Truthfulness: Children’s Definitions, Standards and Evaluative Reactions. Child Development, 63, 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Demorest, A., Meyer, C. Phelps, E. (1984). Words speak louder than actions: Understanding deliberately False Remarks. Child Development, 55, 1527–1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elbers, E., Maier, R., Hoekstra, T. Hoogsteder, M. (1992). Internalization and adult-child interaction. Learning and Instruction, 2, 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Francis, L.J. Pearson, P.R. (1983). Are religious children bigger liars? Psychological Reports, 52, 551–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Funder, D.C. (1987). Errors and Mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judg–ment. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 75–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Habermas, J. (1973) Wahrheitstheorieën. In H. Fahrenbach, (Ed.). Wirklichkeit and Reflexion. Walter Schulz zum 60. Geburtstag. (pp. 211–267 ). Pfullingen: Verlag Neske.Google Scholar
  8. Heymans, P.G. (1991). Lifespan learning: developmental tasks and their management. Internal Report Department of Developmental Psychology, 5. Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  9. Hogrefe, G.J. Wimmer, H. (1986). Ignorance versus False Belief: A Developmental Lag in Attribution of Epistemic States. Child Development, 57, 567–582.Google Scholar
  10. James, W. (1949). Pragmatism. New York: Longmans Green Co.Google Scholar
  11. Kitchener, K.S. King, P.M. (1981). Reflective judgment. Concepts of Justification and their relationship to Age and Education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2, 89–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuhn, D. (1989): Children and Adults as Intuitive Scientists. Psychological Review, 96, 674–689.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewis, M., Stanger, C. Sullivan, M.W. (1989). Deception in 3 year olds. Developmental Psychology, 25, 439–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moshman, D. Franks, B.A. (1986). Development of the Concept of Inferential Validity. Child Development, 57, 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Paniagua, F.A. (1989). Lying by children: Why children say one thing, do another? Psychological Reports, 64, 971–984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Perrier, J., Leekam, S. Wimmer, H. (1987). Three year olds’ difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Perry, J. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years. A Scheme. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Puntel, L.B. (1978). Wahrheitstheorieen in der neueren Philosophie. Eine kritisch- systematische Darstellung. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  19. Raskin, D.C. Yuille, J.C. (1989). Problems in Evaluating Interviews of Children in Sexual Abuse Cases. In S.J. Ceci, M.P. Ross M.P. Toglia (Eds.). Perspectives on Children’s Testimony. (pp. 184–207 ). New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rotenberg, K.J., Simourd, L. Moore, D. (1989). Children’s use of a Verbal-Nonverbal Consistency Principle to infer Truth and Lying. Child Development, 60, 309–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shaklee, H., Holt, P., Elek, S. Hall, L. (1988). Covariation judgment: Improving Rule Use among Children, Adolescents and Adults. Child Development, 59, 755–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shibles, W. (1989). A Revision of the Definition of Lying as an Untruth Told with Intent to Deceive. Argumentation, 2, 99–115.Google Scholar
  23. Sodian, B. (1991). The development of deception in young children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sodian, B. Wimmer, H. (1987). Children’s Understanding of Inference as a Source of Knowledge. Child Development, 58, 424–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Steller, M. (1989). Recent Developments in Statement Analysis. In J.C. Yuille (Ed.). Credibility Assessment. (pp. 135–154 ). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  26. Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1986). Lying as a problem behavior in children: A Review. Clinical Psychological Review, 6, 267–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tarski, A. (1949). The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics. In H. Feigl. W. Sellars (Eds.). Readings in Philosophical Analysis. (pp. 52–84 ). New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
  28. Tugendhat, E. (1960). Tarski’s semantische Definition der Wahrheit and ihre Stelle innerhalb der Geschichte des Wahrheitsproblems im logischen Positivismus. Philosophische Rundschau, 8, 131–159.Google Scholar
  29. Undeutsch, U. (1989). The Development of Statement Reality Analysis. In: J.C. Yuille (Ed.). Credibility Assessment. (pp. 101–120 ). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  30. Wagenaar, W.A. (1991). Een psycholoog is geen leugendetector (A psychologist is not a polygraph for the detection of lies). De Psycholoog, 26, 257–264.Google Scholar
  31. Winner, E. Leekam, S. (1991). Distinguishing irony from deception: understanding the speaker’ s second-order intention. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge Kegan Paul..Google Scholar
  33. Yuille, J.C. (1988). The systematic assessment of children’s testimony. Canadian Psychology, 29, 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. J. F. ter Laak
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Developmental PsychologyUtrecht UniversityThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations