Plans for a Bavarian Exchange

  • Paul P. Bernard
Chapter

Abstract

The bargain which Joseph had proposed to Catherine was accepted by her in the last days of 1783.1 She assured him that she regarded her alliance with Austria as the most stable she had ever concluded. Already she was beginning to see its fruits. As for Cobenzl’s recent proposals, she assured the Emperor that she would not let the opportunity pass to show her gratitude and to render him whatever services he was in need of.

Keywords

Kerch Peninsula Strong Stand Diplomatic Representation Opportunity Pass Absolute Secrecy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. 1.
    Catherine to Joseph, 1 Dec. 1783, Arneth, Jos. Kath.,216–17.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Golitsyn to Kaunitz, 22 Jan. 1784, Wien HHSA, Grosse Correspondenz 406.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaunitz to Pergen, 23 Jan. 1784, Wien HHSA, Grosse Correspondenz 406 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cobenzl to Joseph, 13 Feb. 1784, Beer Fiedler, I, 457–58.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Catherine to Joseph, 23 Jan. 1784, Arneth, Jos. Kath,218. Cf. C. Gershoy, From Despotism to Revolution: 1763–1789,186.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Catherine to Joseph, 24 Feb. 1784, Arneth, Jos. Kath., 221.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frederick to Finckenstein, 8 Mar. 1784; Hertzberg to Finckenstein, 9 Mar. 1784, quoted in Mittelberger, op. cit.,104–05.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaunitz to Mercy, 3 Mar. 1784, Wien HHSA St. K. Frankreich Weisungen 167.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reviczky to Kaunitz, 20 Mar. 1784, Wien HHSA, St. K. Preussen Correspondenz 57. In cypher.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Die orientalische Politik Oesterreichs seit 177478.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Joseph to Lehrbach, 1 April 1784, Wien HHSA St. K. Bayern 61.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    This communication seems not to have been preserved but its existence is confirmed by Kaunitz’s answer: Kaunitz to Joseph, 4 April 1784, Beer, Jos. Kath.,168–69.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Joseph to Kaunitz, 5 April 1784, Beer, Jos. Kath.,170–71.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Joseph to Kaunitz, 7 April 1784, Beer, Jos. Kath.,171.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lehrbach to Joseph, 18 April 1784, Wien HHSA, St. K. Bayern 61.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lehrbach could on occasion be not only pompous but also petty. In 1782 he had boasted in Munich that before long his master would eclipse even Charles V. The Bavarian minister Seiler took issue with this silly boast and Lehrbach thereupon used his influence at court to have him dismissed. Cf. Countess d’Arco to the Dowager Duchess Caroline of Baireuth, P. C. 46, 506–07.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Joseph to Cobenzl, 5 April 1784, Beer Fiedler,I, 459–61.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaunitz to Trautmansdorf, 2 May 1784, Wien HHSA, St. K. Bayern 61. Cf. Mittel-berger, op. cit.,109–10.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Joseph to Leopold, 10 May 1784, Arneth, Jos. Leo., I, 212.Google Scholar
  20. 22.
    Kaunitz to Lehrbach, 11 May 1784, Wien HHSA, St. K. Bayern 61.Google Scholar
  21. 23.
    Kaunitz to Cobenzl, 12 May 1784, Beer Fiedler, I, 461–62.Google Scholar
  22. 24.
    Kaunitz to Cobenzl, 12 May 1784, Wien HHSA, Bavarica 65b.Google Scholar
  23. 25.
    Joseph to Cobenzl, 13 May 1784, Beer Fiedler, I, 462–63.Google Scholar
  24. 26.
    Joseph to Catherine, 13 May 1778, Arneth, Jos. Kath.,224.Google Scholar
  25. 27.
    Joseph to Kaunitz, 14 May 1784, Beer, Jos. Kath., 174–76 Google Scholar
  26. 28.
    Reviczky to Kaunitz, 18 May 1784, Wien HHSA, St. K. Preussen Correspondenz 57. In cypher.Google Scholar
  27. 29.
    Reviczky to Kaunitz, 8 June 1784, Wien HHSA, St. K. Preussen Correspondenz 57. In cypher.Google Scholar
  28. Lehrbach to Kaunitz, 21 May 1784, Wien HHSA, St. K. Bayern 61.Google Scholar
  29. 31.
    Lehrbach to Kaunitz, 22 June 1784, Wien HHSA, St. K. Bayern 61.Google Scholar
  30. 32.
    Trautmansdorf to Kaunitz, 2 June 1784, Wien HHSA, St. K. Bayern 61.Google Scholar
  31. 33.
    Kaunitz to Lehrbach, 10 June 1784, Wien HHSA, St. K. Bayern 61.Google Scholar
  32. 34.
    Catherine to Golitsyn, 22 May 1784, Wien HHSA, Bavarica 65b. Official notification of Catherine’s decision did not come until a week later. Cobenzl to Joseph, 30 May 1784, Beer Fiedler, I, 464–67.Google Scholar
  33. 35.
    Joseph to Leopold, 29 May 1784, Arneth, Jos. Leo., I, 214–15.Google Scholar
  34. 36.
    Joseph to Cobenzl, 8 June 1784, Arneth, Jos. Leo., I, 215–17.Google Scholar
  35. 37.
    Lehrbach to Kaunitz, June 22, 1784, Wien HHSA, St. K. Bayern 61.Google Scholar
  36. 38.
    Lehrbach to Kaunitz, 25 June 1784, Wien HHSA, St. K. Bayern 61. 99 Joseph to Kaunitz, 4 July 1784, Beer, Jos. Kath., 180.Google Scholar
  37. 39.
    Kaunitz to Joseph, 5 July 1784, Beer, Jos. Kath., 181–82.Google Scholar
  38. 41.
    Magnette, op. cit., 129 Google Scholar
  39. 42.
    Ibid, 134.Google Scholar
  40. 43.
    Borgnet, op. cit.,I, 56.Google Scholar
  41. 44.
    Joseph to Lehrbach, 14 July 1789, Wien HHSA, St. K. Bayern 62.Google Scholar
  42. 45.
    Lehrbach to Kaunitz, 16 July 1784, Wien HHSA, St. K. Bayern 62.Google Scholar
  43. 46.
    Lehrbach to Kaunitz, 17 July 1784, Wien HHSA, St. K. Bayern 62.Google Scholar
  44. 47.
    Cf Gooch, Studies….,46. The Order of the Illuminati was founded in Bavaria as an offshoot of the Masonic lodges by one Adam Weishaupt, a young professor at the University of Ingolstadt. It numbered among its members many leading figures in Bavaria, such as the minister Count Seinsheim and the famous Herr Kniegge and its activities in the interest of social reform eventually led to its dissolution. See Doeberl, op. cit., II,320–22. To suggest, however, as Hanfstaengel does, that the Order was actually planning to hand over Bavaria to Austria is fantastic.Google Scholar
  45. 48.
    Cf H. Rall, Kurbaiern in der letzten Epoche der alten Reichsverfassung: 1745–1801.,541–42.Google Scholar
  46. 49.
    A. von Bechmann, Der Churbaierischer Kanzler Alois Freiherr von Kreittmayer,23–24. Bechmann’s assertion that Kreittmayer, under the guise of defending the religious unity of the state, was a champion of the religious monopoly of the Catholic church is, however, demonstrably false.Google Scholar
  47. Joseph to Kaunitz, 19 July 1784, Beer, Jos. Kath., 182.Google Scholar
  48. 51.
    Romantsov to Golitsyn, 27 July 1784, Wien HHSA, Ban. 65b.Google Scholar
  49. 52.
    Joseph to Lehrbach, 30 July 1784, Wien HHSA, St. K. Bayern 62.Google Scholar
  50. 53.
    Phillip Cobenzl to Kaunitz, 30 July 1784, Wien HHSA, Grosse Correspondenz 406.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kaunitz to Joseph, 30 July 1784, Beer, Jos. Kath., 183. Kaunitz had made up his mind to take a strong stand on the Dutch issue already in an interview with Count Wasseneer in June. Cf. Kaunitz to Reviczky, 9 June 1784, quoted in G. Wolf, Österreich and Preussen (1780–1790), 209–10.Google Scholar
  52. 55.
    Joseph to Kaunitz, 30 July 1789, Beer, Jos. Kath., 184–85. 55 Joseph to Kaunitz, 31 July 1784, Beer, Jos. Kath., 184–85.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1965

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul P. Bernard
    • 1
  1. 1.Colorado CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations