Analysis of Tagged MR Cardiac Images with B-spline Models
Abstract
Noninvasive imaging techniques for assessing the dynamic behavior of the human heart are invaluable in the diagnosis of myocardial diseases. MRI is a noninvasive imaging technique that provides superb anatomic information with excellent spatial resolution and soft tissue contrast. Conventional MR studies of the heart provide accurate measures of global and regional myocardial function, chamber volumes, and ejection fractions. In MR tagging, the magnetization property of selective material points are altered in order to create tagged patterns within a deforming body such as the heart muscle. The resulting pattern defines a time-varying curvilinear coordinate system on the underlying tissue. During tissue contractions, the grid patterns move, allowing for visual tracking of the grid intersections over time. The intrinsic high spatial and temporal resolutions of such myocardial analysis schemes provide unsurpassed information about local contraction and deformation in the myocardium which can be used to derive local strain and deformation indices from different regions.
Keywords
Control Point Material Point Displacement Vector Field Spline GridPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]A. Amini, R. W. Curwen, and John C. Gore. Snakes and splines for tracking non-rigid heart motion. In European Conf. on Computer Vision, pages 251–261, U. of Cambridge, UK, April 1996.Google Scholar
- [2]A. Amini and et al. Energy-minimizing deformable grids for tracking tagged MR cardiac images. In Computers in Cardiology, Durham, North Carolina, pages 651–654, October 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]A. Amini, Y. Chen, R. Curwen, V. Mani, J. Sun, Coupled B-snake grids Coupled B-snake grids and constrained thin-plate splines for analysis of 2-D tissue deformations from tagged MRI. IEEE-TMI, 7(3):344–356, June 1998.Google Scholar
- [4]A. Amini, Y. Chen, D. Abendschein, Comparison of landmark-based and curve-based thin plate warps for analysis of left ventricular motion from tagged MRI. in MICCAI, University of Cambridge, UK, Sept. 1999.Google Scholar
- [5]A. Amini, Y. Chen, M. Elayyadi, and P. Radeva, Tag surface reconstruction and tracking of myocardial beads from SPAMM-MRI with parametric B-Spline surfaces. IEEE-TMI 20(2):94–103, February 2001.Google Scholar
- [6]T. Arts, W. Hunter, A. Douglas, A. Muijtjens, and R. Reneman. Description of the deformation of the left ventricle by a kinematic model. J. Biomechanics, 25(10):1119–1127, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [7]L. Axel and L. Dougherty. MR imaging of motion with spatial modulation of magnetization. Radiology, 171(3):841–845, 1989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [8]F. Bookstein. Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE T-PAMI, 11:567–585, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [9]T. Denney and J. Prince. Reconstruction of 3-d left ventricular motion from planar tagged cardiac MR images: An estimation-theoretic approach. IEEE-TMI, 14(4):625–635, December 1995.Google Scholar
- [10]M. E. Mortenson. Geometric Modeling. Wiley, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
- [11]G. Golub, C. V. Loan, Matrix Computations. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, third edition, 1996.Google Scholar
- [12]J. Huang, D. Abendschein, V. G. Davila-Roman, and A. Amini. Spatiotemporal tracking of myocardial deformations with a 4D B-spline model from tagged MRI. IEEE-TMI, 18(10):957–972, October 1999.Google Scholar
- [13]W. Kerwin and J. Prince. Generating 3-D Cardiac Material Markers Using Tagged MRI. Information Processing in Medical Imaging, pp. 313–326, June 1997.Google Scholar
- [14]A. Klein, F. Lee, and A. Amini. Quantitative coronary angiography with deformable spline models. IEEE-TMI, 16(5):468–482, 1997.Google Scholar
- [15]S. Menet, P. Saint-Marc, and G. Medioni. B-snakes: Implementation and application to stereo. In Proceedings of the DARPA Image Understanding Workshop, Pittsburgh, PA, pages 720–726, Sept. 1990.Google Scholar
- [16]W. O’Dell, C. Moore, W. Hunter, E. Zerhouni, and E. McVeigh. Three-dimensional myocardial deformations: Calculation with displacement field fitting to tagged MR images. Radiology, 195(3):829–835, 1995.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [17]J. Park, D. Metaxas, and L. Axel. Volumetric deformable models with parameter functions: A new approach to the 3D motion analysis of the LV from MRI-SPAMM. In Proc. of ICCV, pages 700–705, 1995.Google Scholar
- [18]P. Radeva, A. Amini, and J. Huang. Deformable B-Solids and implicit snakes for 3D localization and tracking of SPAMM MRI data. CVIU, 66(2): 163–178, May 1997.Google Scholar
- [19]N. Reichek. Magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of myocardial function. Mag. Res. Quarterly, 7(4):255–274, 1991.Google Scholar
- [20]M. Unser, A. Aldroubi, M. Eden. B-spline signal processing: Part 1 and Part 2. IEEE T-ASSP, 41(2):821–847, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [21]G. Wahba, Spline methods for observational data, SIAM CBMS-NSF, Philadephia, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [22]E. Waks, J. Prince, and A. Douglas. Cardiac motion simulator for tagged MRI. In Proc. IEEE MMBIA, pages 182–191, 1996.Google Scholar
- [23]Y. Wang and S. L. Lee. Scale-space derived from B-splines. IEEE T-PAMI, 21(9):277–285, 1998.Google Scholar
- [24]Y. Wang, Y. Chen, and A. Amini, Fast LV Motion Estimation Using Subspace Approximation Techniques, IEEE-TMI, (20)6:499–513, June 2001.Google Scholar
- [25]A. Young, D. Kraitchman, L. Dougherty, and L. Axel. Tracking and finite element analysis of stripe deformation in magnetic resonance tagging. IEEE-TMI, 14(3):413–421, September 1995.Google Scholar