Bias in the Arts and the Sciences

  • W. T. Jones
Part of the International Scholars Forum book series (ISFO, volume 14)

Abstract

So far I have merely introduced the set of seven methodological tools that I propose to employ for the analysis of style. I shall now begin their systematic exposition by indicating the wide variety of cultural products — both in the arts and in the sciences — to which, as I hold, these tools are applicable. I shall first show that our seven axes are reflected in non-verbal, as well as in verbal, media. For this purpose I shall cite some examples from the field of painting. Next I propose to show, by means of examples drawn from the social and physical sciences, that these same biases operate in empirical and factual types of inquiry as well as in the more expressive media of literature and the arts. Finally, since I want to show that the effect of bias is not confined to one particular time period, I shall draw my examples widely from different periods, including the present.

Keywords

Anchor Point Deep Space Vision Complex French Revolution Historical Writing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ernest R. Hilgard, Theories of Learning,2nd ed. (New York, 1956), p. 9.Google Scholar
  2. 1.
    Quoted in F. L. Berckelaers (M. Seuphor [pseud.]), Piet Mondrian (New York, n.d.), p. 6o.Google Scholar
  3. 1.
    A. Aulard, The French Revolution: a Political History,trans. by B. Miall (New York, agio).Google Scholar
  4. 2.
    Crane Brinton, A Decade of Revolution (New York, 1934), p. 277.Google Scholar
  5. R. F. Harrod, The Life of Keynes (New York, 195i ), pp. 120–21.Google Scholar
  6. 1.
    Perception, Cognition and Behavior,“ journal of Personality, 1949, 18, 14–15.Google Scholar
  7. 2.
    Intolerance of Ambiguity as an Emotional and Perceptual Personality Variable,“ ibid,p. s og.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Towards a Reformulation of the Perception-Motivation Dichotomy,“ ibid,p. 180.Google Scholar
  9. 1.
    J. S. Bruner and C. C. Goodman, “Values and Need as Organizing Factors in Perception,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,1947, 42, 33-44•Google Scholar
  10. 2.
    Journal of Personality,1949, 18, 15.Google Scholar
  11. 3.
    Contrast D. Krech, who calls for a “revolutionary” approach, i.e,a new set of “basic categories.” Ibid,pp. 69–71.Google Scholar
  12. 2.
    W. I. Thomas and F. Znaniecki, The Polish Peasant in Europe and America (1919), III, 6; G. A. Lundberg, Social Research (192g), p. 207.Google Scholar
  13. 2.
    Among the sciences, mathematics is perhaps the only exception. A mathematician like G. H. Hardy, for example, expresses an other-world bias in his assertion that the study of mathematics is the discovery of a transcendent, Platonic world of forms. (Compare A Mathematician’s Apology (Cambridge, 1940), pp. 63–64.) It is thus easy for a mathematician who has an other-world bias to express it, but it is of course not at all necessary that mathematicians have other-world bias. This-world bias, for instance, expres ses itself in mathematics characteristically in the belief that mathematics is analytic, that it is merely the manipulation of signs in accordance with arbitrarily chosen rules.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1961

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. T. Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.Pomona CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations