Transport Aircraft

Cf. Riese, “Luftrecht” page 187.Google Scholar

ibidem page 188.Google Scholar

To the same effect Goedhuis with respect to Annex A of the Paris Convention in “Handboek voor het Luchtrecht” page 59; Riese, however, appears to consider parachutes as coming under aircraft, see “Luftrecht” page 185.Google Scholar

Shawcross and Beaumont, “Air Law” page 15.Google Scholar

Riese, “Luftrecht” page 188.Google Scholar

Cooper, “Air Law — A Field for International Thinking”, Transport and Communications Review, October-December 1951, page 6.Google Scholar

Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International 1902, page 25.Google Scholar

For the increasing use of aircraft by police authorities in America see Ogburn, “The Social Effects of Aviation” page 434 onwards.Google Scholar

See Goedhuis, “Handboek voor het Luchtrecht” page 61.Google Scholar

Zondag, “Neutraliteit in de lucht” page 10 onwards.Google Scholar

Cooper, “The Legal Status of aircraft” page 31.Google Scholar

Goedhuis, op. cit. page 62, Zondag op. cit. page 13.Google Scholar

Parker van Zandt, “Civil Aviation and Peace” page 23.Google Scholar

Similarly in the project fora new Netherlands Aviation Act (article 17), all aircraft used for military purposes are understood to be military aircraft.Google Scholar

“The Legal Status of Aircraft”, pages 51 and 52.Google Scholar

For the use of transport aircraft for military purposes see Parker van Zandt, “Civil Aviation and Peace” page 22 onwards; Reginald M. Cleveland “Air Transport at War”; Major Oliver Stewart, “Air Power and the expanding community” page 187; Craven, “The Army Air Forces in World War II”, Part I, page 310 onwards; “Survival in the Air Age” a report by the Presidents Air Policy Commission, page 36; Wolfe, “Air Transportation-Traffic and Management” page 134; Wright, “Aviation’s Place in Civilization” page 15.Google Scholar

Cf. Goedhuis, „Handboek voor het Luchtrecht” page 60; Oppikofer, “Das Sonderrecht des Wasserflugzeuges”, Archf LR 1934, page 74; Dijkstra, “Business Law of Aviation” page 3 onwards; see also Rhyne, “Aviation Accident Law” page 282.Google Scholar

The U.S.A. National Motor Vehicle Theft Act has been declared applicable for “any contrivance for flight in the air”, see Dijkstra, op. cit. page 4.Google Scholar

See Ogburn, “The Social Effects of Aviation”; Wright,“Aviation’s Place in Civilization” page 21.Google Scholar

“Avia Vliegwereld” 28th August, 1952, page 483.Google Scholar

Cf. RTL, Chapter XI and ICAO Annex 6.Google Scholar

ICAO Doc. 7278-C/841.Google Scholar

Final Report of the Operations Division, 3rd Session, Doc. 6640-OPS/567, page 28.Google Scholar

For the significance of weather minima for safety see page 61 onwards.Google Scholar

Annex 6, par. 4.2.5. Similar differences are evident when establishing minimum altitudes (Annex 6, par. 4.2.4.) and the experience requirements for pilots-in-command (Annex 6, par. 9.1).Google Scholar

Riese, „Luftrecht” page 202 onwards.Google Scholar

Also Mandl, “La “Nationalité” des Aéronefs n’est qu’une dénomination erronée”, Droit Aerien 1931, page 161.Google Scholar

„Handboek voor het Luchtrecht” page 65.Google Scholar

Cooper, “The Legal Status of Aircraft” page 61.Google Scholar

It exists in French Legislation, see Maschino, “La Condition Juridique du Personnel Aérien” pages 34 and 35. For the difficulties which may arise from such a ruling see Goedhuis, „La Situation Juridique du Commandant de l’Aéronef”, RDILC 1933, page 137.Google Scholar

Cf. Goedhuis, „Handboek voor het Luchtrecht” p. 66; Dutch applicable legislation is to be found in RTL art. 3-11.Google Scholar

Niemeyer, “Crimes et délits commis à bord des aéronefs”, R.D.A. 1929, page 285. Pholien, “Des crimes et délits commis à bord d’aéronefs en vol”, R.D.A. 1929, page 289. Meyer, “Crimes et délits à bord des aéronefs”, R.G.D.A. 1946, page 544. de Visscher, “Le Règlement des compétences pénales en Droit Aérien”, R.G.D.A. 1937, page 329. Idem, “Les conflits de lois en matière de droit aérien”. Recueil des Cours de l’Academie de droit international à la Haye 1934, T. II, page 279. Volkman, “Crimes et délits à bord des aéronefs en droit international”, Droit Aérien 1931, page 26. Danilovicz-Szondy, “Les infractions à la loi pénale commises à bord des aéronefs”, Droit Aérien 1930, page 402. Cooper, “The legal status of aircraft”. Lemoine, “Traité de droit aérien” pages 201 and 792.Google Scholar

Lemoine, op. cit. page 202; Meyer, loc. cit. page 614; Danilovicz, loc. cit. also mentions 5 systems but based on different criteria.Google Scholar

See Cooper, op. cit. Appendix A; I.L.A. Air Law Committee, Lucerne Conference 1952, page 2.Google Scholar

To this effect: de Visscher, R.G.D.A. 1937 page 342 and Receuil des Cours 1934 page 378; Meyer, loc. cit. page 625; proposal of the „Instituutde Droit International” quoted by Cooper, op. cit. page 68.Google Scholar