Nieuwentyt’s Significance for the Philosophy of Science
Though Nieuwentyt’s scientific work is not extensive, it may be useful to give a brief characterization of his writings on purely scientific subjects. A few contributions to mathematics are known; the most important are those, presumably, in which Leibniz’ foundation of the calculus was attacked.
KeywordsPure Mathematic Ontological Argument Fundamental Experience False Idea Mere Idea
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.In the theses A to G on pp. 132-3 this point is explained once again, though in a more succinct manner.Google Scholar
- 2.Namely: Alhazen, Apollonius, Archimedes, Barrow, J. Bernoulli, Tycho Brahe, Cassini, Clavius, Copernicus, Euclides, Flamsteed, Galilei, Gemma, Gregory,’ s Gravesande, Halley, Hipparchus, la Hire, Huygens, Kepler, Leibniz, Mariotte, Newton, Proclus, Ptolemaeus, Fr. van Schoten, Stevin, Varignon, Wallis, and Johan de Witt.Google Scholar
- 3.Keill, Raphson, Spinoza, Whiston, and Wolff.Google Scholar
- 4.Cf. Beth (1959), pp. 39-41.Google Scholar