Biosynthesis of the Iron-Molybdenum and Iron-Vanadium Cofactors
Abstract
The iron-molybdenum cofactor (FeMo-co) (Shah, Brill, 1977) is the prototype of a small family of cofactors that constitute the active sites of the known nitrogenases. No other Mo, V or Fe-containing enzyme is known to employ FeMo-co or its analogs and all known nitrogenases contain one of these cofactors. FeMo-co (MoFe7S9homocitrate) is found at the active site of the nif-encoded, molybdenum nitrogenase, and its structure (Fig 1) was determined as a component of the dinitrogenase protein (NifDK) of Azotobacter vinelandii (Kim, Rees, 1992; Chan et al, 1993). The vnf-encoded nitrogenase-2 contains FeV-co (Smith et al, 1988) and the anf-encoded nitrogenase-3 contains FeFe-co (Davis et al, 1996) as dissociable cofactors that are thought to have structures that differ from FeMo-co only at the position of the heteroatom (Mo, V or Fe) as shown in Fig 1. The structures of FeV-co and FeFe-co have not been determined and the argument that their structures are similar to that of FeMo-co is based on the ability of isolated FeV-co and FeFe-co to replace FeMo-co in the nif-encoded dinitrogenase proteins When apodinitrogenase protein (NifDK, lacking FeMo-co but containing the P clusters) is reconstituted with FeV-co or FeFe-co in vitro, it functions to reduce acetylene and protons effectively, but not N2. Furthermore, FeMo-co is found associated with the anf-encoded dinitrogenase protein (AnfDGK) when cells are supplied with Mo (Gollan et al, 1993; Pau et al, 1993).
Keywords
Dinitrogenase Reductase Gamma Protein Azotobacter Strain Structural Gene Product Strain DJ42Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Allen RM et al. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26890–26896.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Allen RM et al. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 23670–23674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chan MK et al. (1993) Science 260, 792–794.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Davis R et al. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 1445–1450.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Filler WA et al. (1986) Eur. J. Biochem. 160, 371–377.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gollan U et al. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 215, 25–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gosink MM et al. (1990) J. Bacteriol. 172, 1441–1447.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Homer MJ et al. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 24745–24752.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Homer MJ et al. (1993) J. Bacteriol. 175, 4907–4910.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Imperial J et al. (1984) J. Bacteriol. 158, 187–194.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Joerger RD, Bishop PE (1988) J. Bacteriol. 170, 1475–1487.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Joerger RD et al. (1989) J. Bacteriol. 171, 1075–1086.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Joerger RD et al. (1990) J. Bacteriol. 172, 3400–3408.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kennedy C, Dean D (1992) Mol. Gen.Genet. 231, 494–498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kim J, Rees DC (1992) Nature 360, 553–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liang J et al. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 8577–8581.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moreno-Vivian C et al. (1989) Mol. Gen. Gent. 216, 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mouncey NJ et al. (1995) J. Bacteriol. 177, 5294–5302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pau RN et al. (1993) Biochem. J. 293, 101–107.Google Scholar
- Roberts GP, Brill WJ (1980) J. Bacteriol. 144, 210–221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robinson AC et al. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 14327–14332.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roll JT et al. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 4432–4437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schüddekopf K et al. (1993) Mol. Microbiol. 8, 673–684.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shah VK, Brill WJ (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 3249–3253.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shah VK et al. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 1636–1640.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith BE et al. (1988) Biochem. J. 250, 299–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang G et al. (1993) J. Bacteriol. 175, 3031–3042.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng L, Dean DR (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 18723–18726.PubMedGoogle Scholar