Practical Design of Dispersion Managed Soliton System

  • G. C. Gupta
  • Y. Yano
  • T. Ono
  • K. Emura
Conference paper
Part of the Solid-State Science and Technology Library book series (SSST, volume 5)

Abstract

Here we present a model and simulation results for a dispersion-managed soliton system. In this system, both the dispersion map and launched power are optimized to maintain the soliton initial phase at each span length to reduce soliton interaction and soliton break-up. A practical design of the system using a dispersion compensation fiber is investigated for 10 ps-pulsewidth, 20 Gbit/s soliton signals transmitted over 18,000 km with 60 kin amplifier spacing. To demonstrate the suppression of soliton interaction by this technique, we kept the pulsewidth at 10 ps and increase the bit rate. We found that for a higher bit rate, a dispersion compensation fiber should be placed in each amplifier span to suppress soliton interaction. Simulation results suggest that by optimizing technical parameters, 40 Gbit/s soliton signals can be stably transmitted over 15,000 km and 50 Gbit/s soliton signals over the trans-oceanic distance of 9,000 km.

Keywords

Span Length Soliton Pulse Soliton Interaction Dispersion Management Dispersion Compensation Fiber 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hasegawa, A. and Kodama, Y.: Soliton and optical communication, Oxford press, (1995).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agrawal, G. P.: Nonlinear fiber optics, Academic press, (1995).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taylor, J. R.: Optical soliton-theory and experiment, chapter-5, soliton-soliton interaction, (1992), Cambridge University press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Suzuki, M., et al.: Electron. Letter, 31, (1995), p. 2027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haus, H. A., et al.: J. Quantum Electronic, 31, (1995), p. 591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gabitov, I., et al.: Opt. Letter, 21, (1996), p. 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smith, N. J., et al.: Electron. Letter, 32, (1996), p. 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nakazawa, M., et al.: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 34, (1995), L681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakazawa, M., et al.: Electron. Letter, 31 (5), (1995), p. 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar, S. and Hasegawa, A.: Optics Letter, 22 (6), (1997), p. 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wabnitz, S., et al.: Photonics Tech. Letters, 8 (8), (1996), p. 1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wald, M., et al.: Photonics Tech. Letters, 9 (12), (1997), p. 1670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. C. Gupta
    • 1
  • Y. Yano
    • 1
  • T. Ono
    • 1
  • K. Emura
    • 1
  1. 1.C&C Media Research LaboratoriesNEC CorporationMiyamae-ku, KawasakiJapan

Personalised recommendations