Skip to main content

Current and future developments in QCA and image fusion with IVUS

  • Chapter
What’s New in Cardiovascular Imaging?

Summary

Although quantitative coronary arteriography (QCA) has been around now for quite some time, research and development continue to take place along several directions. First of all, the imaging medium has changed from the traditional 35 mm analog cinefilm to the digital world with the CD-R as the preferred carrier. This required adaptations of the basic contour detection algorithms. Stimulated by these same changes, digital review stations or DICOM-Viewers have been developed. In addition, third-generation QCA algorithms have been designed and implemented, and applied to quantitate complex morphology and radiopaque stents.

Intravascular ultrasound has also found its place in interventional cardiology. Major developments include automated contour detection techniques in the individual cross-sections and in the 3D reconstructions obtained from (ECG-triggered) pullback approaches (quantitative coronary ultrasound or QCU). A great deal of attention is also given to improved 3D visualization of the vessel of interest. This will certainly be facilitated by the image fusion of biplane coronary arteriography and intravascular ultrasound, and the associated quantitative techniques QCA and QCU, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown BG, Bolson E, Frimer M, Dodge HT. Quantitative coronary arteriography: estimation of dimensions, hemodynamic resistance, and atheroma mass of coronary artery lesions using the arteriogram and digital computation. Circulation 1977;55:329–337.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Reiber JHC, Serruys PW, Kooijman CJ et al. Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. Circulation 1985;71:280–288.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Reiber JHC. An overview of coronary quantitation techniques as of 1989. In: Reiber JHC, Serruys PW, editors. Quantitative coronary arteriography. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991. p. 55–132.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruschke AVG, Reiber JHC, Lie KI, Wellens HJJ, editors. Lipid-lowering therapy and progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reiber JHC, Van der Zwet PMJ, Koning G et al. Accuracy and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography: observer-, short-, and medium-term variabilities. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993;28:187–198.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Di Mario C, Fitzgerald PJ, Colombo A. New developments in intracoronary ultrasound. In: Reiber JHC, Van der Wall EE, editors. Cardiovascular Imaging. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996. p. 257–275.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Goedhart B, Reiber JHC. The Dicom viewing stations: are they truly different. Int J Card Imaging. In press 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kennedy TE, Nissen SE, Simon R, Thomas JD, Tilkemeier PL, editors. Digital cardiac imaging in the 21st century: a primer. Bethesda, Maryland: The Cardiac and Vascular Information Working Group, American College of Cardiology; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koning G, Van der Zwet PMJ, Von Land CD, Reiber JHC. Angiographic assessment of dimensions of 6F and 7F Mallinckrodt SoftouchR coronary contrast catheters from digital and cine arteriograms. Int J Card Imaging 1992;8:153–161.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Van der Zwet PMJ, Meijer DJH, Reiber JHC. Automated and accurate assessment of the distribution, magnitude, and direction of pincushion distortion in angiographic images. Invest Radiol 1995;30:204–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Van der Zwet PMJ, Reiber JHC. A new approach for the quantification of complex lesion morphology: the gradient field transform: basic principles and validation results. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:216–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reiber JHC, Von Land CD, Koning G et al. Comparison of accuracy and precision of quantitative coronary arterial analysis between cinefilm and digital systems. In: Reiber JHC, Serruys PW, editors. Progress in quantitative coronary arteriography. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1994. p. 67–85.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Van der Zwet PMJ, Reiber JHC. The influence of image enhancement and reconstruction on quantitative coronary arteriography. Int J Card Imaging 1995;11:211–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Koning G, Baretta P, Zwart P, Reiber JHC. Effect of lossy image compression on QCA results [abstract]. Circulation 1995;92(8 suppl):I–22.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cusma JT, Bashore TM. The digital catheterization laboratory — is it practical today? In: Reiber JHC, Van der Wall EE, editors. Cardiovascular Imaging. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996. p. 157–170.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Dumay ACM. Image reconstruction from biplane angiographic projections [dissertation]. Delft: Delft University of Technology; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seiler C, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Basic structure-function relations of the epicardial coronary vascular tree. Basis of quantitative coronary arteriography for diffuse coronary artery disease. Circulation 1992;85:1987–2003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. De Scheerder I, De Man F, Herregods MC et al. Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography for measurement of luminal diameters in normal and diseased coronary arteries. Am Heart J 1994;127:243–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nishimura RA, Edwards WD, Warnes CA et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging: in vitro validation and pathologic correlation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16:145–154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Görge G, Ge J, Haude M et al. Intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of coronary arteries. Herz 1996;21:78–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maurincomme E, Finet G, Reiber JHC, Savalle L, Magnin I. Quantitative intravascular ultrasound imaging: evaluation of an automatic approach [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25special issue:354A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maurincomme E, Finet G. What are the advantages and limitations of three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound imaging? In: Reiber JHC, Van der Wall EE, eidtors. Cardiovascular Imaging. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996. p. 243–255.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Roelandt JRTC, Di Mario C, Pandian NG et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of intracoronary ultrasound images. Rationale, approaches, problems, and directions. Circulation 1994;90:1044–1055.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Li W, Bom N, Von Birgelen C et al. State of the art in ICUS quantitation. In: Reiber JHC, Van der Wall EE, editors. Cardiovascular Imaging. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996. p. 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Prause GPM, Dejong SC, McKay CR, Sonka M. Towards a geometrically correct 3-D reconstruction of turtuous coronary arteries based on biplane angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Int J Card Imaging 1997;13:451–462.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sonka M, Zhang X. Assessment of plaque composition using intravascular ultrasound. This book

    Google Scholar 

  27. Evans JL, Ng KH, Wiet SG et al. Accurate three-dimensional reconstruction of intravascular data. Spatially correct three-dimensional reconstructions. Circulation 1996;93:567–576.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reiber, J.H.C., Dijkstra, J., Koning, G., Oemrawsingh, P.V., Schalij, M.J., Goedhart, B. (1998). Current and future developments in QCA and image fusion with IVUS. In: Reiber, J.H.C., Van Der Wall, E.E. (eds) What’s New in Cardiovascular Imaging?. Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol 204. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5123-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5123-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6154-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5123-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics