Synthesis of Batch Processes with Integrated Solvent Recovery

  • Paul Barton
  • Berit Ahmad
  • W. Cheong
  • John Tolsma
Chapter
Part of the NATO Science Series book series (ASEN2, volume 62)

Abstract

An integrated approach to the reduction of toxic waste in pharmaceutical and specialty chemical manufacturing is presented. The approach focuses on fundamental understanding and redesign of the relevant production processes.

Organic solvents are ubiquitous in the reaction and separation steps of pharmaceutical and specialty chemical processes. This typically leads to the formation of nonideal mixtures of solvents, and the resultant difficulties in separating solvent in pure form for recycle due to the presence of azeotropes. Solvent that is not recovered typically becomes toxic waste. This problem is exacerbated by the nature of manufacturing in these industries: large numbers of small volume products, short process development and product life cycles, and the use of multipurpose batch equipment.

Our approach exploits an understanding of the thermodynamic obstacles to solvent recovery created by the existence of azeotropes in a mixture to modify (or design) the mixtures formed in a process so that solvent recovery and recycling becomes feasible or is improved. We develop the notion of solvent recovery targeting:, given a stream composition, what is the sequence of pure component and azeotrope cuts that can be separated from this mixture using batch distillation, and what is the maximum feasible recovery in each cut? For an azeotropic mixture, this sequence and even the feasibility of recovering a particular pure component, is a strong function of the stream composition. An algorithm that predicts this limiting behaviour in a rapid automated manner based only on knowledge of the properties of the fixed points of the underlying nonlinear dynamic system is presented.

The synthetic component of our work observes that the presence of azeotropes imposes a structure on the overall composition space. This space is divided into a series of batch distillation regions, each of which is characterized by a different sequence of cuts achievable. Hence, we can design a stream composition by moving it from one region to another, hopefully identifying more environmentally favourable alternatives. We present a process wide geometric approach that will, given a set of candidate solvents and entrainers, choose solvents and design the mixtures formed in the process to maximize the potential for solvent recovery and recycling, subject to typical constraints such as reaction stoichiometry, solvation of reactions, etc.

Industrial examples illustrating solvent integration internal to a process, and integration across parallel processes in a multi-product facility are presented. In conclusion, outstanding issues and future directions for solvent recovery targeting are discussed.

Keywords

Pure Component Batch Process Solvent Recovery Separation Boundary Azeotropic Mixture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    B. S. Ahmad and P. I. Barton. Design of multipurpose batch manufacturing facilities with integrated solvent recovery. In Proceedings Fifth World Congress of Chemical Engineering, San Diego, California, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. S. Ahmad and P. I. Barton. Homogeneous multicomponent azeotropic batch distillation. AICh EJournal, 42(12):3419–3433, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. S. Ahmad and P. I. Barton. Process wide design of solvent mixtures. Computers chem. Engng, 1998. submitted.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. S. Ahmad and P. I. Barton. Solvent recovery targeting. AIChE Journal, 1998. in press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. S. Ahmad, Y. Zhang, and P. I. Barton. Product sequences in azeotropic batch distillation. AIChE Journal, 44(5):1051–1070, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. A. Ali. Synthesis of Batch Processing Schemes for the Production of Pharmaceuticals and Specialty Chemicals., PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. J. Allgor, M. D. Barrera, P. I. Barton, and L. B. Evans. Optimal batch process development. Computers chem. Engng, 20(6/7):885–896, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. J. Allgor and P. I. Barton. Screening models for batch process development: II. Case studies. Chemical Engineering Science, 1998. in press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. J. Allgor, L. B. Evans, and P. I. Barton. Screening models for batch process development: I. Design targets for reaction/distillation networks. Chemical Engineering Science, 1998. in press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. E. Baker, A. C. Pierce, and K. D. Luks. Gibbs energy analysis of phase equilibria. Soc. Petrol. Engrs. J., 22:731–742, 1982.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Barolo, G. B. Guarise, S. A. Rienzi, A. Trotta, and S. Macchietto. Running batch distillation in a column with a middle vessel. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 35:4612–4618, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. D. Barrera. Optimal Design and Operation of Batch Processes., PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June 1990.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Bernot, M.F. Doherty, and M.F. Malone. Patterns of composition change in multicomponent batch distillation. Chem. Eng. Science, 45(5):1207–1221, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Bhatia and L. T. Biegler. Dynamic optimization in the planning and scheduling of multiproduct batch plants. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 35:2234–2246, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Brooke, D. Kendrick, and A. Meeraus. GAMS A User’s Guide Release 2.25., The Scientific Press, San Francisco, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. S. Charalambides. Optimal Design of Integrated Batch Processes., PhD thesis, University of London, 1996.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    W. Cheong and P. I. Barton. Azeotropic distillation in a middle vessel batch column: I. Model formulation and linear separation boundaries. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1998. in press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    W. Cheong and P. I. Barton. Azeotropic distillation in a middle vessel batch column: II. Nonlinear separation boundaries. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1998. in press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. G. Davidyan, V. N. Kiva, G. A. Meski, and M. Moran. Batch distillation in a column with a middle vessel. Chem. Eng. Science, 49(18):3033–3051, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.F. Doherty and J.D. Perkins. On the dynamics of distillation processes - I: The simple distillation of multicomponent non-reacting, homogeneous liquid mixtures. Chem. Eng. Science, 33:281–301, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Z. T. Fidkowski, M. F. Malone, and M. F. Doherty. Computing azeotropes in multicomponent mixtures. Computers chem. Engng, 17:1141, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. Hasebe, T. Kurooka, B. B. A. Aziz, I. Hashimoto, and T. Watanabe. Simultaneous separation of light and heavy impurities by a complex batch distillation column. Journal of Chemical Engineering Japan, 29:1000–1006, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. A. Heckman. Alternatives for hazardous industrial solvents and cleaning agents. Pollution Prevention Review, Summer 1991.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    IBM. IBM OSL user reference manual. Kingston NY.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    E. M. Kirschner. Environment, health concerns force shift in use of organic solvents. Chemical & Engineering News, pages 13–20, June 20th 1994.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Z. Lelkes, P. Lang, B. Benadda, and P. Moszkowicz. Feasibility of extractive distillation in a batch rectifier. AIChE Journal, 44:810–822, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. A. Linninger, S. A. Ali, E. Stephanopoulos, C. Han, and G. Stephanopoulos. Synthesis and assessment of batch processes for pollution prevention. AIChE Symposium Series, 90(303):46–58, 1994.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. Modi, J. P. Aumond, M. Mavrovouniotis, and G. Stephanopoulos. Rapid plant-wide screening of solvents for batch processes. Computers chem. Engng, 20(S):S375–5380, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    H. N. Pham and M. F. Doherty. Design and synthesis of heterogeneous azeotropic distillations-I. hetergeneous phase diagrams. Chem. Eng. Sci., 45:1823–1836, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    H. N. Pham and M. F. Doherty. Design and synthesis of heterogeneous azeotropic distillations-II. residue curve maps. Chem. Eng. Sci., 45:1837–1843, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    D. W. T. Rippin. Batch process systems engineering: A retrospective and prospective view. Computers chem. Engng, 17(S):S1–S13, 1993.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    C. S. Robinson and E. R. Gilliland. Elements of Fractional Distillation., McGraw-Hill, New York, fourth edition, 1950.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    B. T. Safrit, A. W. Westerberg, U. Diwekar, and O. M. Wahnschafft. Extending continuous conventional and extractive distillation feasibility insights to batch distillation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 34:3257–3264, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    H. E. Salomone, J. M. Montagna, and O. A. Iribarren. Dynamic simulations in the design of batch processes. Computers chem. Engng, 3(18):191–204, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    H. E. Salomone, J. M. Montagna, and O. A. Iribarren. A simulation approach to the design and operation of multiproduct plants. Chem. Eng. Res. and Design, 75(A4):427–437, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    R. A. Sheldon. Consider the environmental quotient. CHEMTECH, pages 38–47, March 1994.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    J. E. Tolsma and P. I. Barton. Batch heteroazeotropic distillation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1998. in preparation.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    J. E. Tolsma and P. I. Barton. Computation of heteroazeotropes. Computers chem. Engng, 22(S):S61—S68, 1998.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    D. B. Van Dongen and M. F. Doherty. On the dynamics of distillation processes — VI: Batch distillation. Chem. Eng. Science, 40:2087–2093, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Barton
    • 1
  • Berit Ahmad
    • 1
  • W. Cheong
    • 1
  • John Tolsma
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering and Energy LaboratoryMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations