How similar are the genomes of the cool season food legumes?

  • N. F. Weeden
  • T. H. N. Ellis
  • G. M. Timmerman-Vaughan
  • C. J. Simon
  • A. M. Torres
  • B. Wolko
Chapter
Part of the Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture book series (PSBA, volume 34)

Abstract

The genomes of pea, field-pea, lentil, faba bean, chickpea and lupin are compared in relation to size, level of polymorphism and arrangement of genes on the respective linkage maps. Lupin is quite distinct, as its distant phylogenetic relationship would indicate. Chickpea possesses a significantly smaller genome than the members of the Viceae and appears to display less polymorphism at the molecular level. However, examination of the linkage maps available for pea, lentil, faba bean and chickpea indicate that many loci linked in pea also exhibit linkage in the other pulse crops. The extent of conservation of linkage arrangements may be as much as 40% of the genome, suggesting that gene locations in one pulse crop are often easily transferable to the other crops and permitting a generalized linkage map to be constructed for these pulse crops.

Keywords

Linkage Group Faba Bean Pulse Crop Apply Genetic Isozyme Locus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahn, S., J.A. Anderson, M.E. Sorrells, and S.D. Tanksley. 1993. Molecular and General Genetics 241:483–490.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bisby, F.A. 1981. In: Advances in Legume Systematics. pp 409–425 (Eds. R.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven). Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
  3. Blixt, S. 1972. Agri Hort. Genetica 30:1–293.Google Scholar
  4. Bonierbale, M.W., R.L. Plaisted, and S.D. Tanksley. 1988. Genetics 120: 1095–1103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Boutin S.R., N.D. Young, T.C. Olson, Z.H. Yu, R.C. Shoemaker, and C.E. Vallejos. 1995. Genome 38: 928–937.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brien, S.J., P.A. O’Brien, W.A. Cowling, R. H. Potter, M. Shankar, R.A.C. Jones, and M.G.K. Jones. 1997. Plant & Animal Genome V. Abstr.Google Scholar
  7. Brummer, E.C., J.H. Bouton, and G. Kodiert. 1993. In: Genetics Maps (Ed. S.J. O’Brien). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. pp. 6:82–83.Google Scholar
  8. Cabrera, A. and A. Martin. 1989. FABIS Newsletter 24: 3–5.Google Scholar
  9. Cabrera, A., J.I. Cubero, and A. Martin. 1989. FABIS Newsletter 23: 5–7.Google Scholar
  10. Cheung, W.Y., G. Champagne, N. Hubert, B.S. Landry. 1997. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94:569–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corby, H.D.L. 1981. In: Advances in Legume Systematics. pp. 657–669 (Eds. R.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven). Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
  12. Cristofolini, G. 1989. Plant Systematics and Evolution 166:265–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cristofolini, G., and L. Feoli-Chiapella. 1984. Webbia 38:105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Devos, K.M., S. Chao, Y. Li Q, M.C. Simonetti, and M.D. Gale M.D. 1994. Genetics 138:1287–1292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dirlewanger, E., P.G. Isaac, S. Ranade, M. Belajouza, R. Cousin, H. deVienne. 1994. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 88:17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellis, T.H.N., L. Turner, R.P. Hellens, D. Lee, C.L. Harker, C. Enard, C. Domoney, and D.R. Davies. 1992. Genetics 130:649–663.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellis, T.H.N., R.P. Hellens, L. Turner, D. Lee, C. Domoney, and T. Welham. 1993. Pisum Genetics, 25:5–12.Google Scholar
  18. Folkeson, D. 1985. Pisum Newsletter 17:15–16.Google Scholar
  19. Folkeson, D. 1990. Ph.D. Dissertation., University of Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
  20. Galasso, I., M. Frediani, M. Maggiani, R. Cremonini, and D. Pignone. 1996. Genome 39:258–265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garvin, D.F., M.L. Roose, and J.G. Waines. 1989. Journal of Heredity 80:373–376.Google Scholar
  22. Garvin, D.F. and Weeden, N.F. 1994. Journal of Heredity 85:273–278.Google Scholar
  23. Gaur, P.M. and A.E. Slinkard. 1990. Journal of Heredity 81: 455–461.Google Scholar
  24. Gilpin, B.J., J.A. McCallum, T.J. Frew, and G.M. Timmerman-Vaughan. Theoretical and Applied Genetics (in press).Google Scholar
  25. Goldblatt, P. 1981 In Advances in Legume Systematics, pp 427–463 (Eds. R.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven). Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
  26. Gopinath, D.M. and C.R. Burnham. 1956. Genetics 41:382–395.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Halward, T., H.T. Stalker, and G. Kochert. 1993. In: Genetics Maps (S.J. O’Brien, Ed.). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. pp. 6:86–87.Google Scholar
  28. Kass, E. and M. Wink. 1993. Proceedings of the 7th International Lupin Conference. Evora, Portugal. pp. 267–270.Google Scholar
  29. Kass, E. and M. Wink. 1995. Botanica Acta 108:149–162.Google Scholar
  30. Kazan, K., Muehlbauer, F.J., Weeden, N.F., and Ladizinsky, G. 1993. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86:417–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kidwell, K.K., C.S. Echt, T.C. Osborn, and T.J. McCoy. 1993. In: Genetics Maps (S.J. O’Brien, Ed.). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. pp. 6:84–85.Google Scholar
  32. Kiss, G.B., G. Csanadi, K. Kaiman, P. Kalo, and L. Okresz. 1993. Molecular and General Genetics 238:129–137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kozik, A., M. Matvienko, B. Sheres, V.G. Paruvangada, T. Bisseling, A. Van Kammen, T.H.N. Ellis, T.A. LaRue, and N.F. Weeden. 1996. Plant Molecular Biology 31:149–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kupicha, F.K. 1977. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 74:131–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lamm, R. 1951. Hereditas 37:356–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lamm, R. and J.R. Miravalle. 1959. Hereditas 45:417–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lamprecht, H. 1945. Hereditas 31:347–382.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lamprecht, H. 1948. Agri Hort. Genet. 6:10–48.Google Scholar
  39. Macas, J., W. Weschke, H. Bäumlein, U. Pich, A. Houben, U. Wobus, and I. Schubert. 1993. The Plant Journal 3:883–886.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marshall, D.R., P. Broue, and R.N. Oram. 1974. Journal of Heredity 65:198–203.Google Scholar
  41. Martín, A. and P. Barceló, P. 1984. In: Systems for cytogenetic analysis in Vicia faba L. pp. 63–76 (Eds. G.P. Chapman and S.A. Tarawai). Martinus Nijhoff / Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marx, G.A. 1969. Pisum Newsletter 1:20–21.Google Scholar
  43. Marx, G.A. 1987. Pisum Newsletter 19:38–39.Google Scholar
  44. McGrath J.M. and C.F. Quiros. 1991. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 82:668–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Muehlbauer, F.J., N.F. Weeden, and D.L. Hoffman. 1989. Journal of Heredity 80: 298–303.Google Scholar
  46. Palmer, J.D., B. Osorio, J. Aldrich, and W.F. Thompson. 1987. Current Genetics 11:275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Palmer, J.D., B. Osorio, and W.F. Thompson. 1988. Current Genetics 14:65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Paruvangada, V.G., Weeden, N.F., Cargnoni, T., Yu, J. Gorel, F., Frew, T., Timmerman-Vaughan, G.M., and McCallum, J. 1995. Pisum Genetics 27:12–13.Google Scholar
  49. Polans, N.O. 1993. Pisum Genetics 25:36–38.Google Scholar
  50. Polans, N.O., N.F. Weeden, and W.F. Thompson. 1986. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 72:289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Polhill, R.M. 1976. Botanical Systematics 1:143–380.Google Scholar
  52. Satovic, Z., A.M. Torres, and J.I. Cubero. 1996. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 93:1130–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schubert, I. and R. Rieger. 1991. FABIS Newsletter 28/29:14–22.Google Scholar
  54. Schubert, I., R. Rieger, and A. Michaelis. 1988. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 76:64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Simon, C.J. and F.J. Muehlbauer. 1997. Journal of Heredity 88:115–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Simon, C.J., M. Tahir, and F.J. Muehlbauer. 1993. In: Genetics Maps (S.J. O’Brien, Ed.). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. pp. 6:96–100.Google Scholar
  57. Sjödin, J. 1971. Hereditas. 68: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tahir, M., and F. J. Muehlbauer. 1994. Journal of Heredity 85:306–310.Google Scholar
  59. Tanksley, S.D., M.W. Ganal, J.P. Prince, M.C. De Vicente, and M. W. Bonierbale. 1992. Genetics. 132: 1141–1160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Temnykh, S.V., F.L. Gorel’, V.A. Berdnikov, and N.F. Weeden. 1995. Pisum Genetics 27:23–25.Google Scholar
  61. Timmerman-Vaughan, G.M., J.A. McCallum, T.J. Frew, N.F. Weeden, and A.C. Russell. 1996. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 93:431–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Torres, A.M., N.F. Weeden, and A. Martin. 1993 a. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 85: 937–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Torres, A.M., T. Millán, S. Cobos, and J.I. Cubero. 1993b.. XXVIII Jornadas Luso-Espanholas de Genética, Faro, Portugal.Google Scholar
  64. Torres, A. M., Z. Satovic, J. Canovas, S. Cobos, and J.I. Cubero. 1995. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91:783–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Torres A.M., M.C. Vaz Patto, Z. Satovic, and J.I. Cubero. (in press). Journal of Heredity.Google Scholar
  66. Vaillancourt, R.E. and A.E. Slinkard. 1993. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 73:917–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weeden, N.F., J.J. Doyle and M. Lavin. 1989. Evolution. 43:1637–1651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Weeden, N.F., and T. Cargnoni. 1994. Plant Genome II, San Diego. Abst.Google Scholar
  69. Weeden, N.F. and G.A. Marx. 1987. Journal of Heredity 78:153–159.Google Scholar
  70. Weeden, N.F., Muehlbauer, F.J., and Ladizinsky, G. 1992. Journal of Heredity 83:123–129.Google Scholar
  71. Weeden, N.F., Swiecicki, W.K., Timmerman, G.M., and Ambrose, M. 1993a. Pisum Genetics 23:13–14.Google Scholar
  72. Weeden, N.F., Swiecicki, W.K., Timmerman, G.M., and Ambrose, M. 1993b. Pisum Genetics, cover.Google Scholar
  73. Weeden, N.F. and B. Wolko. 1990. In: Genetic Maps, 5th edition, S.J. O’Brien (ed.) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY pp.6.106-6.112.Google Scholar
  74. Whitkus, R., J. Doebley, and M. Lee. 1992. Genetics, 132:1119–1130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Wink, M. 1993. In: Methods in Plant Biochemistry. Pp 197–239 (Ed. P. Waterman) vol 8. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  76. Wolko, B. and N.F. Weeden. 1990. Genetica Polonica 31:179–187.Google Scholar
  77. Wolko, B. and N.F. Weeden. 1995. Proceedings of the 7th International Lupin Conference. Evora, Portugal. pp. 42–49.Google Scholar
  78. Yu, G.X., A.L. Bush, and R.P. Wise. 1995. Genome 39:155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. F. Weeden
    • 1
  • T. H. N. Ellis
    • 2
  • G. M. Timmerman-Vaughan
    • 3
  • C. J. Simon
    • 4
  • A. M. Torres
    • 5
  • B. Wolko
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Horticultural SciencesCornell UniversityGenevaUSA
  2. 2.John Innes InstituteNorwichEngland
  3. 3.Crop and Foods CRILincolnNew Zealand
  4. 4.USDAWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  5. 5.Departamento de Mejoray AgronomiaC.I.D.A.CordobaSpain
  6. 6.Instytut Genetyki RoslinPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations