Artificial Reef Programme in the Balearic Islands: Western Mediterranean Sea

  • Isabel Moreno
Chapter

Abstract

Analysing the Balearic artificial reef programme so far, it is interesting that biological success seems to be related to the state of conservation of the seabed and the water column, rather than to fisheries production. It may be more interesting to focus on a different solution to the problem. Perhaps instead of deploying artificial structures it would be a better long-term investment to restore the natural environment and its balance directly by taking steps to stop environmental damage and avoid future problems. As the Balearic Islands are small in area and human impact is recent and not of an industrial nature this may be more feasible here than in other European coastal areas. The strengthening of fishing regulations (both commercial and recreational) and their thorough implementation may be more effective and naturally balanced than deploying artificial reefs to damage illegal fishing gear, something which has not proved to be totally effective. Regardless of the effectiveness of reefs, measures for the correct management of the coastal zone (Bohnsack, 1989) are necessary in the Balearics. The recent interest in using artificial reefs in many coastal areas and the problems and scepticism aroused (Cognetti, 1989; Ody, 1990) stress the need to have an accurate overview of the role of these devices on different seabeds. Experiments deploying reef units that have different aims, size, shape, composition and surface textures, on various types of seabed would provide this. Such information would provide a scientific database describing the impact of reef deployment and the relationship of these structures within various marine ecosystems as a whole, which could be used to model ideas for reef placement prior to executing extensive plans. Data relating to the use and catch on fishing grounds and related areas before and after reef deployment are also required. This information should include the amount and composition of the catches with the different gear used, as well as the size frequency distribution of the species caught. The knowledge gained from these experiments could be of great help to the developers or authorities involved in reef programmes.

Keywords

Seagrass Meadow Balearic Island Fishery Production Artificial Reef Remotely Operate Vehicle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ambrose, R.F. and S.L. Swarbrick. 1989. Comparison ofish assemblages on artificial and natural reefs off the coast of southern California. Bulletin of Marine Science. 44(2): 718–733.Google Scholar
  2. Ardizone, G.D., C. Chimenz and A. Belluscio. 1982. Benthic communities on the artificial reef of Fregene. CIESM. 55–57.Google Scholar
  3. Asada, Y., Y. Hirasawa and F. Nagasaki. 1983. Eaménagement des pêches au Japon. FAO Doc. Tech. Pêches. 258: 1–25.Google Scholar
  4. Aska, D.Y. (éd.) 1978. Artificial reefs in Florida: proceedings of a Conference held in June 10 and 11 at the Bayboro Campus. University of Florida. Florida Sea Grant College Reports. 24: 1–69.Google Scholar
  5. Aska, D.Y. (ed.) 1981. Artificial Reefs Conference Proceedings. Florida Sea Grant Reports. 41: 1–227.Google Scholar
  6. Augris, C., P. Cochonat and S. Gullaume. 1984. Récifs artificiels à Languedoc-Roussillon. Reports IFREMER DERO/GM1, 1–35.Google Scholar
  7. Badalamenti, F., G. Giaccone, M. Gristina and S. Riggio. 1985. An eighteen month survey of the artificial reef off Terrasini (NW Sicily): the algal settlement. Oebalia. XI: 417–425.Google Scholar
  8. Balduzzi, A., F Boero, R. Cattaneo, M. Pansini and R. Pronzato. 1986. The colonization of the artificial reef of the Monaco Natural Reserve. Association Monégasque par la Protection de la Nature: 25–28.Google Scholar
  9. Bockstael, M.E. and L. Caldwell. 1986. Economic analysis of artificial reefs: a pilot study of selected methodologies. Artificial Reef Development Center Report. 6: 1–90.Google Scholar
  10. Bockstael, M.E., A. Graeffe and I. Strand. 1985. Economic analysis of artificial reefs: an assessment of issue and methods. Artificial Reef Development Center Report. 5: 1–94.Google Scholar
  11. Bohnsack, J.A. 1983. Species turnover and the order versus chaos controversy concerning reef fish community structure. Coral Reefs. 1: 223–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bohnsack, J.A. 1989. Are high densities of fishes at artificial reefs the result of habitat limitation or behavioral preference? Bulletin of Marine Science. 44(2): 631–645.Google Scholar
  13. Bohnsack, J.A. and D.L. Sutherland. 1985. Artificial Reef Research: a review with recommendation for future priorities. Bulletin of Marine Science. 37(1): 11–39.Google Scholar
  14. Bombace, G. 1981. Notes on experiments in artificial reefs in Italy in management of living resources in the Mediterranean coastal areas. Stud. Rev. Gen. Fish. Council. 58: 309–324.Google Scholar
  15. Bombace, G. 1982. Il punto sulle barrière artificiali: Problemi e prospetive. Naturalista Siciliano. IV Suppl: 573–591.Google Scholar
  16. Bombace, G. 1989. Artificial Reefs in the Mediterranean Sea. Bulletin of Marine Science. 44: 1023–1032.Google Scholar
  17. Bregliano, P. and D. Ody. 1985. Structure du peuplement ichtyologique de substrat dur à travers le suivi des récifs artificiels et d’une zone témoin. Colloques françaises-japonaises. Océanographie Marseille. 6: 101–112.Google Scholar
  18. CIESM 1982. Journée d’études sur les aspects scientifiques concernant les récifs artificiels et la mariculture suspendue Mónaco. 1–128.Google Scholar
  19. Cognett, G. 1989. Artificial Reefs. Why? Manne Pollution Bulletin. 20: 20–21.Google Scholar
  20. Colunga, L. and R. Stone, (eds.) 1974. Proceedings of the first International conference on Artificial Reefs. College Station Center for Marine Resources, Texas A and M University 1–151.Google Scholar
  21. Debernardi, E. 1980. Underwater marine reserve of Monaco. Notes on Artificial Reefs. Stud. Rev. G.F.M.FAO. 58: 339–341.Google Scholar
  22. Debernardi, E. 1984. Contribution d’une revenue dans l’aménagement des pêches cotières. XVII éme Session de C.G.P.M.Google Scholar
  23. FAO 1986. Consultation Technique sur la conchyliculture en mer et les récifs artificiels. Fish Reports. 357: 1–175.Google Scholar
  24. Fowler, AJ. 1987. The development of sampling strategies for population studies of coral reef fishes. A case study. Coral Reefs. 6: 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harmelin, J.G. 1987. Structure et variabilité de l’ichtyofaune d’une zone protégée en Méditerranée (parc National de Port-Cros, France) Pub. délia Stazione Zoologia di Napoli 1: Manne Ecology. 8(3): 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harmelin-Vivien, M.L., J.G. Harmelin, C. Chauvet, C. Duval, R. Galzin, P. Lejeune, G. Barnabé, R. Blanc, R. Chevalier, J. Duclerc and G. Lasserre. 1985. Evaluation des peuplements et populations de poissons. Méthodes et problèmes. Revue Ecologie (Terre Vie). 40: 467–539.Google Scholar
  27. IFREMER. 1987. Les récifs artificiels en Méditerranée française Doc DRY-RH Sète 1–16.Google Scholar
  28. Lefevre, J.R., J. Duclerc, A. Meinsz and M. Ragazzi. 1983. Les récifs artificiels des établissementes de pêches du Golfe Juan et de Beaulieu-sur-mer, Alpes Maritims. CIESEM 1982.Google Scholar
  29. Moreno, L, I. Roca, I. Barceló, I. Massutó, S. Puigserver and M. Salamanca. 1989. Estudio ecológico de la plataforma costera Balear y valoración de las zonas potencialmente aptas para la instalación de arrecifes artificiales. Directión General de Pesca y Cultivos Marinos, Govern Balear, pp. 1–60.Google Scholar
  30. Ody, D. 1990. Les récifs artificiels en France: bilan, analyse, perspectives. Bulletin Société Zoologique Française. 114(4): 49–55.Google Scholar
  31. Polovina, J.J. 1989. Artificial reefs: nothing more than benthic fish aggregations. CalCOFI Report. 30: 37–39.Google Scholar
  32. Relini, J. 1979. Richerche in corso in Liguria sulle barrière artificiali Atti 8° Simposio Nazionale sulla conservazione della Natura, Bari. pp. 79–87.Google Scholar
  33. Relini, G. and P. Cormaggio. 1989. Colonization patterns of hard substrate in the Loano artificial reef. FAO Fisheries Report. 429: 108–113.Google Scholar
  34. Relini, G. and E. Moretti. 1986. Artificial reef and Posidonia bed protection off Loano (Western Ligurian Riviera). FAO Fisheries Report. 357: 104–108.Google Scholar
  35. Relini, G., C.N. Bianchi, G. Matricardi and E. Pisano. 1983. Research in Progress on colonization of hard substrata in the Ligurian Sea. CIESM. 1982. pp. 77–78.Google Scholar
  36. Relini, G., A. Peirano, L. Tunesi and L. Orsi-Relini. 1986. The artificial reef in the Marconi Gulf (Eastern Ligurian Riviera). FAO Fisheries Report. 357: 95–103.Google Scholar
  37. Riggio, S., G. Giaccone, F Badalamenti and M. Gristina. 1985. Further notes on the development of benthic communities on the artificial reef off Terrasini (NW Sicily). CIESM. 29: 321–323.Google Scholar
  38. Riggio, S., F. Badalamenti, R. Chemello and M. Gristina. 1986. Zoobenthic colonization of a small artificial reef in southern Tyrrhenian: Results of a three year survey. FAO Fisheries Report. 357: 109–119.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isabel Moreno
    • 1
  1. 1.Marine Biology LaboratoryUniversitat de les Illes BalearsPalmaSpain

Personalised recommendations