Unit Quaternion and CRV: Complementary Non-Singular Representations of Rigid-Body Orientation

  • V. Milenkovic
  • P. H. Milenkovic
Chapter

Abstract

Euler’s angles, commonly used to represent orientation or rotation of a rigid body, suffer from “representational singularities,” creating difficulties in the numerical computation of smooth paths in the vicinity of the singular points in the parameter space. The unit quaternion is a 4-parameter 3-degree-of-freedom singularity-free representation of orientation; multiplying unit quaternions is useful operationally for combining changes in orientation. The conformal rotation vector (CRV) is the unique conformal mapping from the manifold occupied by the unit quaternions to a 3-space; the CRV is useful for interpolating between orientations. Rotations about fixed axes, the minimum angular displacement transformations between body orientations shown by Juttler (1998) to be great circles in quaternion space, are shown here to be a family of planar circles in CRV space.

Keywords

Unit Sphere Great Circle Unit Quaternion Fixed Axis Quaternion Multiplication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cayley, A. (1843), On the Motion of Rotation of a Solid Body, Cambridge Math. J., vol. III, 1843, pp. 224–232.Google Scholar
  2. Denavit, J., and Hartenberg, R.S. (1955), A Kinematic Notation for Lower-Pair Mechanisms Based on Matrices, ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 77, pp. 215–221.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Desai, J.P., Zefran, M., Kumar, V. (1998), A Geometric Approach to Second and Higher Order Kinematic Analysis, Recent Advances in Robot Kinematics: Analysis and Control, Lenarcic, J. and Husty, M. L. (eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 365–374.Google Scholar
  4. Gervasi, P., Karakusevic, V., and Zsombor-Murray, P. J. (1998), An Algoriithm for Solving the Inverse Kinematics of a 6R Serial Manipulator Using Dual Quaternions and Grassmannians, Recent Advances in Robot Kinematics: Analysis and Control, Lenarcic, J. and Husty, M. L. (eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 383–392.Google Scholar
  5. Goldstein, H. (1959), Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley Publ. Co., Reading MA, p. 107.Google Scholar
  6. Hamilton, Sir W. R. (1969), Elements of Quaternions, Chelsea Publ. Co., New York.Google Scholar
  7. Juttler, B. (1998), Rotation Minimizing Spherical Motions, Recent Advances in Robot Kinematics: Analysis and Control, Lenarcic, J. and Husty, M. L. (eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 413–422.Google Scholar
  8. Kuipers, J. B. (1999), Quaternions and Rotation Sequences: A Primer with Applications to Orbits, Aerospace, and Virtual Reality, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Loo, M., Hamidieh, Y. A., and Milenkovic, V. (1990), Generic Path Control for Robot Applications, Proceedings of Robots 14 Conference, RI of SME, Detroit MI, pp. 10–49 to 10–64.Google Scholar
  10. Milenkovic, V. (1982), Coordinates Suitable for Angular Motion Synthesis in Robots, Robots VI Conference Proc., RI of SME Tech. Paper MS82–217, Detroit MI, pp. 407–420.Google Scholar
  11. Milenkovic, V. (1992), Framework to Facilitate Orientational Motion Planning in Robots, Proc. of 3rd Int Workshop on Adv. in Robot Kinematics, Ferrara, Italy, pp. 47–53.Google Scholar
  12. Milenkovic, V., and Milenkovic, P. H. (1994), Limited Existence of Three-Dimensional Conformal Mapping in Robots, Proceedings of.4th Int. Workshop on Adv. in Robot Kinematics, Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp. 59–68.Google Scholar
  13. Paul, R. P. (1981), Robot Manipulators: Mathematics, Programming, and Control, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  14. Pervin, E., and Webb, J. A. (1982), Quaternions in Computer Vision and Robotics, Tech. Report, Dept. of Computer Science, Carnegie-Mellon U., Report CMU-CS-82–150.Google Scholar
  15. Rooney, J. (1977), A Survey of Representations of Spatial Rotations About a Fixed Point, Environment and Planning B, vol. 4, pp. 185–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shepperd, S. W. (1978), Quaternion from Rotation Matrix, Journal of Guidance and Control, vol. 1, pp. 223–224.MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Wroblewski, W., and Caccavale, F. (1998), A Spatial Algebra Approach to Kinematic Control of Dual-Arm Systems, Recent Advances in Robot Kinematics: Analysis and Control, Lenarcic, J. and Husty, M. L. (eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 197–206.Google Scholar
  18. Yang, A. T., and Freudenstein, F. (1964), Application of Dual Number Quaternion to the Analysis of Spatial Mechanisms, J. of Applied Mechanics, Trans. ASME, pp. 300–308.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Milenkovic
    • 1
  • P. H. Milenkovic
    • 2
  1. 1.Sturgeon BayUSA
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations