Educational reforms — Women’s life patterns: A Swedish case study

  • Inga Elgqvist-Saltzman

Abstract

This article focuses on reforms in Swedish higher education since the 1970s. It asks whether and, if so, how, these reforms affected women. Though the reform movement succeeded in bringing more of them into the university, women are still segregated into predominantly female fields. This segregation in higher education translates into occupational segregation in the workforce. The second half of the study asks why the reforms have failed to equalize men’s and women’s education and life-chances. Through the life history approach, the author finds that Swedish reforms proceeded on the basis of “rational efficiency” models which have little to do with how women make educational and work decisions. The author argues that in order for equalization to occur, the task will be to reform higher education in a way that matches rational efficiency with human sensibility.

Keywords

High Education Labour Market Educational Reform Rational Efficiency Swedish Woman 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrae-Thelin, A. and Elgqvist-Saltzman, I. (1987). “Side by side in classrooms and at work”. MS submitted for inclusion in Kelly, G. P. (ed.), Handbook of Women’s Education.Google Scholar
  2. Connell, W. F. (1980). A History of Education in the Twentieth Century World. Canberra, Curriculum Development Centre.Google Scholar
  3. Dahlström, E. (ed.) (1971). The Changing Romes of Men and Women. Boston. Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Report (1968) on the status of women in Sweden.Google Scholar
  5. Elgqvist-Saltzman, I. (1985). “Rational efficiency and human sensibility in educational reform”. Scandinavian J. of Educational Research 29: 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ministry of Labour (1985). Side by side: Report on equality between women and men in Sweden. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  7. Premfors, R. (1981). “National policy styles and higher education in France, Sweden and the UK”. European Journal of Higher Education 16 (2): 143–262.Google Scholar
  8. Pusey, M. (1976). Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Case Analysis in Education. Sydney, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  9. Ranour, M. L., Strasburg, B. L. and Lipman-Blumen (1982) “Women in higher education”. Harvard Educational Review 52(2).Google Scholar
  10. SOU (1983) 4. Om hälften vor kvinnor (If half of them were women). Stockholm. Jämstalldhets-kommitten.Google Scholar
  11. Statistics, Sweden (1989) Women and Men. A key to Equality. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  12. Ve, H. (1982). Ideals of equality in schoolsystem of the welfare state. Paper presented at the Xth World Congress Research Group 32: Women in Society, Mexico City, 16–21 Aug. 1982. Stencil.Google Scholar
  13. Wemersson, I. (1988). “Gender equality-ideology and reality” in S. Ball and S. Larsson (eds.) (1988). The Struggle for Democratic Education: Equality and Participation in Sweden. Brighton. The Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inga Elgqvist-Saltzman
    • 1
  1. 1.University of UmeaUmeaSweden

Personalised recommendations