Advertisement

Nuclear Power: Is it Worth the Risk?

  • Ronald D. Milo
Part of the Technology, Risk, and Society book series (RISKGOSO, volume 6)

Abstract

In considering the ethical implications of the use of nuclear power, the chief question to be addressed is this: Can the use of nuclear power be justified, given that it involves serious risks of harm to human beings and their environment? Are the risks involved in the use of nuclear power morally acceptable?

Keywords

Risk Assessment Nuclear Accident Nuclear Waste Disposal Prudent Policy Social Policy Maker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cohen, B.L. 1974. “Perspectives on the Nuclear Debate.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 30(9): 35–39.Google Scholar
  2. De Marsily, C., et al. 1977. “Nuclear Waste Disposal: Can the Geologist Guarantee Isolation?” Science 196 (August 5): 519–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Goodin, R.E. 1978. “Uncertainty as an Excuse for Cheating Our Children: The Case of Nuclear Wastes.” Policy Sciences 10: 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gould, L.C. 1983. “The Radioactive Waste Management Problem.” In C.A. Walker, L.C. Gould and E.J. Woodhouse, eds., Too Hot to Handle. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hynes, M., and E. Vanmarcke. 1976. “Reliability of Embankment Performance Predictions.” Proceedings of the ASCE Engineering Mechanics Division Specialty Conference. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: University of Waterloo Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kates, R.W. 1978. Risk Assessment of Environmental Hazard. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Kuhlman, C.W. 1976. “ERDA Waste Management Program.” In Proceedings of Conference on Public and Policy Issues in Nuclear Waste Management. Chicago, October 27-29. Washington, D.C.: Harrison Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Lovins, A.B. 1977. Soft Energy Paths: Toward a Durable Peace. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  9. Lowrance, W.W. 1976. Of Acceptable Risk. Los Altos, CA: W. Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  10. Rowe, W.D. 1977. An Anatomy of Risk. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  11. Schumacher, E.F. 1973. Small is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  12. Schwing, R.C.and W.A. Albers. eds. 1980. Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough? New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  13. Slovic, P., and Fischhoff, B. 1983. “How Safe is Safe Enough? Determinants of Perceived and Acceptable Risk.” In CA. Walker, L.C. Gould and E.J. Woodhouse, eds., Too Hot to Handle. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 112–150.Google Scholar
  14. Woodhouse, E.J. 1972. “Revising the Future of the Third World: An Ecological Perspective on Development.” World Politics, October 1-33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald D. Milo

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations