Growing different field crops under high salinity levels and utilization of genetically engineered Rhizobia and Azotobacter salt drought tolerant strains

  • M. Talaat El-Saidi
  • A. M. M. Ali
Part of the Tasks for vegetation science book series (TAVS, volume 28)


The purpose of this work is to test different cultivars from fodder beet, oil rape seeds and barley if they can resist successfully severe conditions of high salinity with the production of economic yield. In spite of the high saline water used in irrigation for different fodder beet cultivars, Rota cultivar gave a yield for the roots and leaves of about 140 tons acre-’ with the weight of some roots about 45-50kg plant-’. In addition, the fresh leaves can be used for feeding cattle, sheep, and goats during spring months.

On the other hand, the winter growing Brassica napus oil seed rape requires less water than summer oil crops. Rape seed oil is used for in cooking and margarine production. Var. AD 201 gave the highest yield about 1.34 tons acre-’, Wester cv. only gave 0.715 tons from seeds. Barley: some cultivars can resist salinity and give higher yield from kernels and hay, about 1.4 tons of kernels and 2.9 hay acre-’ or 1.6 tons of kernels and 3.05 of hay acre-’ under high nitrogen and phosphorus applications.

The introduction of new genetically engineered Rhizobia and Azotobacter, salt, high temperature and drought tolerant strains suits the new cultivated crops at Sinai Governorate. These strains are suitable to the environment in Sinai where conditions are severe. They are also highly efficient in nitrogen fixation as they reduce fertilization costs, soil pollutants and improve the soil physical properties. The above mentioned strains (tolerating 10-20% NaC1) are originally produced by isolation of the responsible genes from Bacillus sp. strain (tolerating 30% NaCI and 55°C) which is in turn being isolated from the soil of Aswan Governorate. The genes were introduced to the most efficient nitrogen fixing strains of Rhizobia and Azotobacter. The most suitable strains were isolated and introduced in the cultivated areas in Sinai with the new introduced crops. The results of the yield and the nitrogen contents in plants and the soil are significantly higher than those of the control areas where these strains are not applied and are fertilized with other kinds of fertilizers.


Rhizobia Azotobacter salinity drought tolerant strains fodderbeet oil rape seeds barley 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ali, A.M.M., Ahmed, K.A., Hamoda, M.H. & Sharaf, A.N. 1984. Mutagenicity carcinogenicity of organically and chemically fertilized Zea mays shoots and roots extracts in different biological systems. Bull. Fac. Agric., Cairo Univ. 35: 401–409.Google Scholar
  2. Ali, A.M.M. & Abd El-Halim, M.M. 1988. The location of osmoregulatory genes in barley and Bacillus as donors and their insertion in Azotobacter chrococcum genome. Egyptian Society of Genetic Engineering Second Annual Meeting. 27–28 January, 1988.Google Scholar
  3. Ali, A.M.M., Abd El-Halim, M.M., Sayed, A.I.H. & Abd El-Aal, S.Kh. 1988a. Unique and repeated DNA sequences in two Phaseolus vulgaris inbreds and in the F6 of their hybrid. Bull. Fac. Agric., Cairo Univ. 39: 169–177.Google Scholar
  4. Ali, A.M.M.. Abd El-Halim, M.M., Sayed, A.I.H. & Abd El-Aal, S.Kh. 1988b. The role of eukaryotic repetitive DNA sequences in frame shift mutants repair. Bull. Fac. Agric., Cairo Univ. 39: 639–646.Google Scholar
  5. Allen, O.N. 1959. Experimentation in soil bacteriology. Burgess Publishing Co., Mameopolis, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  6. Ames, B.N., McCann, J. & Yamasaki. E. 1975. Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella, mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test. Mutation Res 31 (6): 347–364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bendicle, A.J. & Bolton, E.T. 1967. Relatedness among plants as measured by the DNA agar technique. Plant Physiol. 42: 939–967.Google Scholar
  8. Bergersen, F.J. 1977. Physiological chemistry of dinitrogen fixation by legumes. In: R.W.F. Hardy & W.S. Silver (eds) A Treatise in Dinitrogen Fixation, pp.519–555. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Britten, R.J. & Kohne, D.E. 1968. Repeated sequences in DNA. Science 161: 529–540.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, S.A., Chang, A.C.Y. & Hus, L. 1972. Non-chromosomal antibiotic resistance in bacteria: genetic transformation of E. coli by R. factor DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69: 2110–2114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dart, P.J. 1977. Infection and development of leguminous nodules. In: R.W.F. Hardy & W.S. Silver (eds) A Treatise in Dinitrogen Fixation. Section III. Biology, pp.367–472. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  12. O’Leary, J.W. 1985. Salt water crops. Chemtech. 15 (9): 562–566. Shay, G. 1990. Saline agriculture, salt tolerance plants for developing countries. National Academic Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  13. Smith, D.B. Si. Flavell, R.B. 1974. The relatedness and evaluation of repeated nucleatide sequences in the genomes of some Gramineae species. Biochem. Genet. 12: 243–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Talaat El-Saidi
    • 1
  • A. M. M. Ali
    • 2
  1. 1.Agric. Botany DepartmentNational Research Center, Tahrir St. DokkiCairoEgypt
  2. 2.Microbial Genetics DeptNational Research Center, Tahrir St. DokkiCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations