Geostatistics Tróia ’92 pp 555-566 | Cite as
Including a Regional Trend in Reservoir Modelling Using the Truncated Gaussian Method
Abstract
When studying the geometry of petroleum reservoirs, we have to integrate different kinds of data (wells and seismic) as well as geological knowledge. Usually, wells show the fine vertical variation of lithofacies, but are less precise about horizontal variations. On the another hand, seismic data give a good idea of the horizontal evolution but we lose information on the vertical variability. A realistic reservoir model has to take this into account.
Until now, we have been able to model vertical variability with HERESIM. Here we show that the truncated gaussian model can be used to model horizontal variability or both horizontal and vertical variability. This can be achieved by using both horizontal and vertical non stationary proportions with a stationary gaussian random function. We present the extension of the method in detail, focusing on how to perform structural analysis, which is possible because the gaussian is still stationary, even if the lithofacies show strong non stationarities. Thus we work with coherent non stationary models for the simple and cross variograms of lithofacies. This methodology is illustrated on examples.
Keywords
Reservoir Modelling Regional Trend Conditional Simulation Gaussian Method Geological KnowledgePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]Matheron G., Beucher H., de Fouquet Ch., Galli A., Conditional simulation of the geometry of fluvio-deltaic reservoirs. SPE paper no 16753, SPE 1987 Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, 27–30 September 1987. Vol. X: Formation, Evaluation and Reservoir Geology.Google Scholar
- [2]de Fouquet Ch., Beucher H., Galli A., Ravenne Ch., Conditional simulation of random sets: application to an argilaceous sandstone reservoir. In: Geostatistics ed. by M. Armstrong, Proc. 3rd International Geostatistics Congress, Avignon, 5–9 Sept. 1988, Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publ, 1989, Vol. 2, pp. 517–530.Google Scholar
- [3]Matheron G., A simple substitute for conditional expectation: the disjonctive kriging, 1976, Proceedings, NATO ASI: “advanced geostatistics in the mining Industry” Rome.Google Scholar
- [4]Rivoirard J., Introduction to disjunctive kriging and nonlinear geostatistics, 1990, Centre de Géostatistique ENSMP FontainebleauGoogle Scholar