Viscous sublayer analysis of riblets and wire arrays

  • Paolo Luchini
Part of the Fluid Mechanics and its Applications book series (FMIA, volume 19)

Abstract

Ever since it was observed [1] that the experimentally effective spacing of riblets for turbulent drag reduction is of the same order of magnitude as the thickness of the viscous sublayer of the turbulent stream, it has been clear that the viscous sublayer plays a dominant role in the mechanics of this effect. Within the viscous sublayer we are allowed to neglect nonlinearities and thus to concentrate on the Stokes, low Reynolds number, flow of a viscous fluid along a corrugated surface. Bechert and Bartenwerfer [2] analysed longitudinal mean flow in this approximation and obtained a characterization of the surface in terms of the parameter “protrusion height”, namely the distance from the riblet tips to the virtual plane surface that the velocity profile appears to originate from. Bechert et al. [3] studied transverse flow across the riblets experimentally and by means of an analogical simulation, and measured a protrusion height for this flow as well.

Keywords

Drag Reduction Stoke Flow Streamwise Vortex Wire Array Viscous Sublayer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bechert D. W., Bartenwerfer, M. and Reif, W.-E., On the drag reduction of the shark skin. AIAA paper 85-0546 (1985).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bechert, D. W. and Bartenwerfer M., The viscous flow on surfaces with longitudinal ribs. J. Fluid Mech. 206 (1989) 105–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bechert D. W., Bartenwerfer, M. and Hoppe G., Turbulent drag reduction by nonplanar surfaces-a survey on the research at TU/DLR Berlin. In: Gyr, A. (ed.), Proc. IUTAM Symp. on Structure of Turbulence and Drag Reduction. [Zürich, 25-28 July 1989.] Berlin: Springer (1990) pp. 525–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Luchini P., Manzo, F. and Pozzi A., Resistance of a grooved surface to parallel flow and cross-flow. J. Fluid Mech. 228 (1991) 87–109.MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luchini P., Manzo, F. and Pozzi A., Resistance of a grooved surface to parallel and cross flow calculated by B.E.M. In: Marino, L. and Piva, R. (eds), Proc. IABEM (International Association for Boundary Element Methods) Symp. [Rome, 15-18 Oct. 1990.] Berlin: Springer (1991) pp. 328–338.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luchini P., Manzo, F. and Pozzi A., Viscous eddies in flow over a grooved surface computed by a Gaussian-integration Galerkin boundary-element method. AIAA J. 30 (1992) 2168–2170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bartenwerfer, M. and Bechert D. W., Die viskose Strömung über behaarten Oberflächen. Z. Flugwiss. Weltraumforsch. 15 (1991) 19–26.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kramer M. O., Einrichtung zur Verminderung des Reibungswiderstandes. Reichpatentamt, Patentschrift Nr. 669 897, Klasse 62b, Gruppe 408 (1939). Patented from 17 March 1937 on.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bechert D. W., Hoppe G., Hage, W. and Bruse M., Widerstandsvermindernde Oberfläschen der Natur im Experiment. 1. Bionik-Kongress, Wiesbaden, 1-13 June 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Luchini
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Gasdinamica, Facoltà di IngegneriaUniversità di NapoliItaly

Personalised recommendations