Chaotic Size Dependence in Spin Glasses

  • Charles M. Newman
  • Daniel L. Stein
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (ASIC, volume 396)

Abstract

We argue that chaotic size dependence is an intrinsic feature of the infiniterange Sherrington-Kirkpatrick (SK) model and should occur in short-range spin glasses if their low temperature behavior is analogous to that of the SK model. Chaotic size dependence offers a new way to distinguish, both numerically and theoretically, between the multistate picture of short-range spin glasses based on the SK model and the two-state picture based on scaling theories.

Keywords

Pure State Spin Glass Gibbs State Gibbs Distribution Ising Spin Glass 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Binder, K. and Young, A.P.: 1986, Rev. Mod. Phys., 58, 801.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bray, A.J. and Moore, M.A.: 1987, Heidelberg Colloquium on Glassy Dynamics, J.L. Van Hemmen and I. Morgenstern (eds.) Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  3. Chung, K.L.: 1974, A Course in Probability Theory, Academic Press, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Derrida, B. and Toulouse, G.: 1985, J. Phys. (Paris) Lett., 46, L223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards, E. and Anderson, P.W.: 1975, J. Phys., F5, 965.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fisher, D.S. and Huse, D.A.: 1986, Phys. Rev. Lett., 56, 1601.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fisher, D.S. and Huse, D.A.: 1987, J. Phys., A20, L1005.MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Huse, D.A. and Fisher, D.S.: 1987, J. Phys., A20, L997.MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  9. McMillan, W.L.: 1984, J. Phys., C17, 3179.ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Mezard, M., Parisi, G., Sourlas, N., Toulouse, G. and Virasoro, M.: 1984a, Phys. Rev. Lett., 52, 1156.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mezard, M., Parisi, G., Sourlas, N., Toulouse, G. and Virasoro, M.: 1984b, J. Phys. (Paris), 45, 843.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Mezard, M., Parisi, G. and Virasoro, M.: 1985, J. Phys. (Paris) Lett., 46, L217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Newman, C.M. and Stein, D.L.: 1992, Phys. Rev., B46, 973.ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Parisi, G.: 1979, Phys. Rev. Lett., 43, 1754.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pastur, L.A. and Shcherbina, M.V.: 1991, J. Stat. Phys., 62, 1.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reger, J.D., Bhatt, R.N. and Young, A.P.: 1990, Phys. Rev. Lett, 64, 1859.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sherrington, D. and Kirkpatrick, S.: 1975, Phys. Rev. Lett., 35, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Young, A.P., Bray, A.J. and Moore, M.A.: 1984, J. Phys., C17, L149, L155.ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles M. Newman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Daniel L. Stein
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Courant Institute of Mathematical SciencesNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Dept. of PhysicsUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations