Measurement of plant biomass and net primary production of herbaceous vegetation

  • M. J. Roberts
  • S. P. Long
  • L. L. Tieszen
  • C. L. Beadle
Chapter

Abstract

The process of photosynthesis results in the conversion of light energy to chemical energy. This energy input by primary producers is used either to do work or else it is stored. The stored chemical energy is our prime concern here, since it is this biomass which can be harvested for food, fuel, fibre or other uses. Biomass is obviously of equal importance in natural ecosystems since it provides the organic molecules and energy source for all other trophic levels. This chapter is confined to the measurement of biomass and net primary production in herbaceous species. Although the theory behind the measurement of these parameters in trees and shrubs is the same, the techniques often require dimensional analysis and sampling of reference units, which are outside the scope of this discussion.

Keywords

Salt Marsh Plant Biomass Ground Biomass Dead Root Ingrowth Core 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wiegert, R.G. (1962) The selection of an optimal quadrat size for sampling the standing crop of grasses and forbs. Ecology 43, 125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chapman, S.B. (1976) Production ecology and nutrient budgets. In: Methods in Plant Ecology (ed. S.B. Chapman) рp.157–228. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Golley, F.B. (1961) Energy values of ecological materials. Ecology 42, 581–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chiariello, N.R., H.A. Mooney and K. Williams (1989) Growth, carbon allocation and cost of plant tissues. In: Plant Physiological Ecology: field methods and instrumentation (Pearcy, R.W., Ehleringer, R.W., Mooney, H.A. and Rundel, P.W., eds.) pp.,327–366. Chapman and Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rodin, L.E. and N.I. Basilovic (1965) Production and Mineral Cycling in Terrestrial Vegetation (English translation, ed. G.E. Fogg). 253 pp. Scripta Technica Ltd., Oliver and Boyd, London.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hussey, A. and S.P. Long (1982) Seasonal changes in weight of above-and below-ground vegetation and dead plant material in a salt marsh at Colne Point, Essex. J. Ecol. 70, 757–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hansson, A.-C. and O. Andren (1986) Below-ground plant production in a perennial grass ley (Festuca pratensis Huds.) assessed with different methods. J.Appl. Ecol. 23, 657–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hussey, A. (1980) The Net Primary Production of an Essex Salt Marsh, with Particular Reference to Puccinellia maritima. Ph.D. thesis, University of Essex, U.K.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Long, S.P. and C.F. Mason (1983) Saltmarsh Ecology 1st edn. Blackie, Glasgow, London.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wiegert, R.G. and F.G. Evans (1964) Primary production and the disappearance of dead vegetation in an old field in South-eastern Michigan. Ecology 45, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lomnicki, A., E. Bundola and K. Jankowska (1968) Modification of the Wiegert-Evans method for estimation of net primary production. Ecology 49, 147–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Odum, E.P. and A.E. Smalley (1959) Comparison of population energy flow of a herbivorous and a deposit-feeding invertebrate in a salt marsh ecosystem. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. Washington. 45, 617–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bowen, G.D. (1980) Misconceptions, concepts and approaches to rhizosphere biology. In: Contemporary Microbial Ecology (eds. D.C. Ellwood, J.H. Hedger, M.J. Latham, J.M. Lynch and J.H. Slater) pp. 283–304. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fogel, R. and G. Hunt (1983) Contribution of mycorrhizae and soil fungi to nutrient cycling in a Douglas Fir ecosystem. Can. J. Forestry Research 13, 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Long, S.P. and M.B. Jones (1992) Introduction, aims, goals and general methods. In: Primary Productivity of Grass Ecosystems of the Tropics and.Sub-tropics (S.P. Long, M.B. Jones and M.J. Roberts, eds.) pp. 1–24. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kamnalrut, A. and J.P. Evenson (1992) Monsoon grasslands in Thailand. In: Primary Productivity of Grass Ecosystems of the Tropics and Sub-tropics (S.P. Long, M.B. Jones and M.J. Roberts, eds.) pp. 100–126. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jones, M.B., S.P. Long and M.J. Roberts (1992) Synthesis and conclusions. In: Primary Productivity of Grass Ecosystems of the Tropics and Sub-tropics (S.P. Long, M.B. Jones and M.J. Roberts, eds.) pp. 212–255. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Piedade, M.T.F., W.J. Junk and S.P. Long (1991) The productivity of the C4 grass Echinochloa polystachya on the Amazon Flood-plain. Ecology 72, 1456–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. J. Roberts
  • S. P. Long
  • L. L. Tieszen
  • C. L. Beadle

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations