Geometry and continuity of deep-water sandstones and siltstones, Brushy Canyon Formation (Permian) Delaware Mountains, Texas

  • F. B. Zelt
  • C. Rossen

Abstract

Sandstones and siltstones of the Permian (Guadalupian) Brushy Canyon Formation were deposited in 50 to more than 300 m of water in the Delaware Basin of west Texas. The transition from slope to basin-floor palaeoenvironments is exposed in a 24 km long transect of extensive outcrops that occur along the western flanks of the Guadalupe and Delaware mountains.

Several types of deep-water channels occur in the study area. Individual channels were filled with thick-bedded sandstones that were deposited by high-density sediment gravity flows, thin-bedded classical turbidites that were deposited by low-density turbidity currents, or siltstones that were deposited from suspension. Many channel-fills change facies laterally from amalgamated turbidite sandstones in channel axes to thin-bedded turbidites and siltstones along channel margins. Cross-bedded sandstones that occur as lag deposits at the bases of some channels are interpreted to have been deposited tractively by high-density sediment gravity flows that carried most of their sediment loads further basinward. Siltstone drapes occur along the bases and margins of some channels, are common in slope and proximal basin-floor palaeoenvironments and are interpreted to reflect channel abandonment.

Levee deposits are common in the Brushy Canyon Formation. Stratal geometries along many channel margins indicate aggradation of adjacent levee deposits during channel filling. Levee deposits commonly include laterally continuous, thin-bedded classical turbidites that were deposited by low-density flows. However, near channel margins, levees can include thick-bedded, amalgamated turbidites that were deposited by high- and low-density flows and cross-bedded sandstones that were deposited tractively by high-density flows. Along channel margins, palaeocurrents were commonly oriented parallel to slightly oblique to the channel trend and lenticular sandstone beds are common. In levee deposits, palaeocurrents generally were oriented 20–60° away from the adjacent channel margin.

Keywords

Ripple Mark Overbank Deposit Channel Margin Sediment Gravity Flow Buena Vista 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fischer, A.G. and Sarnthein, M. 1988. Airborne silts and dune-derived sands in the Permian of the Delaware Basin. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 58, 637–643.Google Scholar
  2. Harms, J.C. 1974. Brushy Canyon Formation, Texas: A deep-water density current deposit. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 85, 1763–1784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Harms, J.C. and Pray, L.C. 1974. Erosion and deposition along the Mid-Permian intracratonic basin margin, Guadalupe Mountains, Texas (Abs.). In: Dott, Jr, R.H. and Shaver, R.H. (eds) Modern and Ancient Geosynclinal Sedimentation. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication, 19, 37.Google Scholar
  4. Harris, M.T. 1982. Sedimentology of the Cutoff Formation (Permian), western Guadalupe Mountains, west Texas and New Mexico. MSc thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 186 pp.Google Scholar
  5. King, P.B. 1942. Permian of west Texas and southeast New Mexico. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 26, 535–763.Google Scholar
  6. King, P.B. 1948. Geology of the Southern Guadalupe Mountains, Texas. U.S Geological Survey Professional Paper 215, 183 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Lowe, D.R. 1982. Sediment gravity flows: II. Depositional models with special reference to the deposits of high-density turbidity currents. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 52, 279–297.Google Scholar
  8. Mutti, E. 1992. Turbidite Sandstones. Agip S.p.A., S. Donato Milanese, 275 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Rossen, C. 1985. Sedimentology of the Brushy Canyon Formation (Permian, Early Guadalupian) in the onlap area, Guadalupe Mountains, west Texas. MSc thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 314 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Sarg, J.F. and Lehmann, P.J. 1986. Lower Middle Guadalupian facies and stratigraphy, San Andres/Grayburg formations, Permian Basin, Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexico. In: Moore, G.E. and Wilde, G.L. (eds) Lower and Middle Guadalupian Facies, Stratigraphy, and Reservoir Geometries, San Andres/Grayburg Formations, Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexico and Texas. Permian Basin Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Publication, 86-25, 1–5.Google Scholar
  11. Sarg, J.F., Rossen, C., Lehmann, P.J. and Pray, L.C. (eds) 1988. Geologic Guide to the Western Escarpment, Guadalupe Mountains, Texas. Permian Basin Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Publication, 88-30, 60 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Silver, B.A. and Todd, R.G. 1969. Permian cyclic strata, northern Midland and Delaware basins, west Texas and southeastern New Mexico. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 53, 2223–2251.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. B. Zelt
    • 1
  • C. Rossen
    • 2
  1. 1.Exxon Exploration CompanyHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Exxon Production Research CompanyHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations