Experimental Approaches to Interaction Energies and Structures in Supramolecular Complexes
Chapter
Abstract
Empirical approaches to interaction energies and structures in host-guest complexes are explored based on experimental association free energies ΔGcplx and NMR investigations. It is shown how additive increments can be used to describe within limits of sufficient matching between binding sites and of negligible strain variations total ΔGcplx values for organic ion pairs, inluding DNA groove binders, for crown ether and cryptand complexes with alkali metals, and for porphyrin associations. The important role as well as deficiencies of force field methods within this LFER-type of analysis of non-covalent interactions is discussed, also with respect to semiempirical NMR shielding calculations.
Keywords
Crown Ether Salt Bridge Mobile Host Supramolecular Chemistry Supramolecular Complex
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Supramolecular Chemistry, Part 44; Part 43: Schneider, H.-J.; Blatter, T.; Eliseev, A.; Rüdiger, V.; Raevsky, O.A.; Pure Appl.Chem., in print.Google Scholar
- 2.See e.g. Fersht, A.R.; Shi, J.-P.; Knill-Jones, J.; Lowe, D.M.; Wilkinson, A.J.; Blow, D.M.; Brick, P.; Carter, P.; Waye, M.M.Y.; Winter, G. Nature 1985, 314, 235, and references cited therein.Google Scholar
- 3.Williams, D.H.; Waltho, J.P. Pure Appl.Chem. 1989, 61, 585; Biochem. Pharmacol. 1988, 37, 133, and references cited therein.Google Scholar
- 4.See e.g. a) Benner, S., Ed.; Redesigning the Molecules of Life. Springer, Berlin 1988; b) Burnett, R.M.; Vogel, H.-J. Biological Organizations/Macromolecular Interactions at High Resolution. Academic Press, New York 1987; c) Roberts, S.M., Ed.; Molecular Recognition: Chemical and Biochemical Problems. Royal Soc.Chem., Cambridge 1989.Google Scholar
- 3.See e.g. Straatsma, T.P.; Mc Cammon, J.A. Mol.Design and Modeling 1991, 202, 497.Google Scholar
- 6.a) Wuethrich, K. Science 1989, 243, 45. b) Wuethrich, K. Acc. Chem. Res. 1989, 22, 36. c) Kessler, H.; Steuernagel, S. in Pept. Pharm. Ward, D. J., Ed.; Elsevier: New York 1991 p18.Google Scholar
- 7.Schneider, H.-J. Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 1993, 112, 412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Schneider, H.-J.; Buchheit, U.; Becker, N.; Schmidt, G.; Siehl, U. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1985, 107, 7827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Schneider, H.-J.; Blatter, T.; Simova. S. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1991, 113, 1996, and unpublished results with α-cylodextrin.Google Scholar
- 10.For reviews see e.g.: Komiyama, M.; Bender, M.L. in: The Chemistry of Enzyme Action. Page, M.I., Ed.; Elsevier, Amsterdam 1984; p. 505; Bender, M.L.; Komiyama, M. Cyclodextrin Chemistry, Springer, Berlin, 1977.Google Scholar
- 11.Schneider, H.-J.; Gschwendtner, W.; Weigand, E.F. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1979, 101, 7195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Schneider, H.-J.; Schiestel, T.; Zimmermann, P. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1992, 114, 7698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Schneider, H.-J.; Blatter, T. Angew. Chem. 1992, 104, 1244; Angew.Chem., Int.Ed.Engl. 1992, 31, 1207.Google Scholar
- 14.See e.g. Tarn, S.-C.; Williams, R.J.P. Struct.Bonding (Berlin) 1985, 63, 103.Google Scholar
- 15.Schneider, H.-J.; Kramer, R.; Simova, S; Schneider, U. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1988, 110, 6442; Schneider, H.-J.; Theis, I. J.Org.Chem. 1992, 57, 3066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Stauffer, D.A.; Barrans, R.E.; Dougherty, D.A. J.Org.Chem. 1990, 55, 2762; Dougherty, D.A.; Stauffer, D.A. Science 1990, 250, 1558; and references cited therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Schneider, H.-J. Angew.Chem. 1991, 103, 1419; Angew.Chem., Int.Ed.Engl. 1991, 30, 1417; Schneider, H.-J.; Blatter, T.; Zimmermann, P.; Angew.Chem 1990., 102, 1194; An gew.Chem., Int.Ed.Eng 1990., 92, 1161; Schneider, H.-J.; Werner, F.; Blatter, T.; J.Phys.Org.Chem. 1993, in print; and references cited therein.Google Scholar
- 18.Burley, S.K.; Petsko, G.A. Adv. Protein Chem. 1988, 39, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Sussman, S. Science 1991, 253, 872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.See e.g. Cation Binding by Macrocycles. Inoue, Y.; Gokel, G.W., Eds., M. Dekker Inc., New York, Basel, 1990.Google Scholar
- 21.Raevsky, O.A. Russ. Chem. Rev. Engl. 1990, 59, 219 and references cited therein; see also Abraham, M.H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1993, 22, 73.Google Scholar
- 22.Schneider, H.-J.; Rüdiger,V.; Raevsky, O.A. J.Org.Chem., 1993, 58, 3648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Further cases for explicit treatment of lone pairs: a) Taylor, R.; Kennard, O. Acc.Chem.Res. 1984, 17, 320; b) Vedani, A.; Dunitz, J.D. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1985, 107, 7653; c) Vedani, A.; Huhta, D.W. ibid 1990, 112, 4759.Google Scholar
- 24.Kano, K.; Hayakawa, T.; Hashimoto, S. Bull.Chem.Soc.Jpn., 1991, 64, 778, and erlier references.Google Scholar
- 25.Alden, R.G.; Ondrias, M.R.; and Shelnutt, J.A. J.Am.Chem.Soc, 1990, 112, 691 and references cited therein.Google Scholar
- 26.Pasternack, R.F.; Bustamante, C.; Collings, J.; Giannette, A and Gibbs, E.J. J.Am.Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 5393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Schneider, H.-J.; Wang, M., submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- 28.See e.g. Sinanoglu, O. in: Molecular Associations in Biology. Academic Press, New York, 1968, p.427; Connors, K.A.; Sun, S. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1971, 93, 7293; Diederich, F.; Pure Appl.Chem, 1989, 61, 1523,; Smithrud, D.B.; Diederich, F. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1990, 112, 339, and references cited therein.Google Scholar
- 29.See e.g. Böhm, H.-J. J.Comp.Aided Molec.Design 1992, 6, 61.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994