Advertisement

Gödel’s Theorem and The Mind…Again

  • Graham Priest
Chapter
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 60)

Abstract

Attempts to establish, a priori, the nature and structure of the mind go back to the very origins of philosophy, and have continued apace ever since. The things on the basis of which, people have tried to establish this are many and varied: the phenomenology of consciousness, the nature of action, end even the nature of the state (to take but a few examples). Logic, as traditionally (though incorrectly) conceived, is precisely a compendium of the laws of thought. Hence it is unsurprising that some philosophers have tried to use logic as a basis in the inquiry. The high point of this enterprise was undoubtedly Kant and his successors. Kant thought that the structure of the mind could be read off from the categories of logic – which was, for him, the somewhat bowdlerised form of Aristotelian Logic of his day; and under Hegel, not only the number of categories blossomed, but so did the nature of the mind in question; until it came to encompass everything – literally.

Keywords

Turing Machine Recursive Function Peano Arithmetic Incompleteness Theorem Deductive Argument 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Boyer, D. (1983),‘Lucas Gödel and Astaire’, Philosophical Quarterly 33, pp. 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Craig, W. (1953),‘On Axiomatizability within a System’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 18, pp. 30–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lucas, J.R. (1961),‘Minds, Machines and Gödel’, Philosophy 36, pp. 112–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Penrose, R. (1989), The Emperor’s New Mind: conceming computers minds and the laws of physics (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  5. Priest, G. (1987), In Contradiction (Nijhoff).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham Priest

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations