Investment in Clean Technology and Transboundary Pollution Control

  • Frederick van der Ploeg
  • Aart J. de Zeeuw
Chapter
Part of the Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Series on Economics, Energy and Environment book series (ECGY, volume 2)

Abstract

The transboundary pollution control model describes how a government can effectively deal with the pollution externality within a country by means of emission charges, and how governments can jointly deal with the pollution externality between countries by means of coordinating emission charges. In such models the emission-output ratio is generally fixed. In this note the option of stimulating investment in clean technology in order to lower the emission-output ratio is introduced. Such a framework allows the analysis of elements of the environmental debate between optimists who favour growth in order to have resources to invest in clean technology, and pessimists who favour bringing down production and the by-product pollution. The answer, of course, depends on the elasticity of the emission-output ratio against the stock of clean technology.

Keywords

Clean Technology Marginal Damage International Coordination Transboundary Pollution Pollution Externality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Başar, Tamer and Geert Jan Olsder (1982). Dynamic Nuncooperative Game Theory, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Dasgupta, Partha (1982). The Control of Resources, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Fershtman, Chaim (1989). Fixed rules and decision rules: Time consistency and subgame perfection, Economics Letters, 30, 3, pp. 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hoel, Michael (1992). Emission taxes in adynamic international game of CO2 emissions, in: Pethig, Rüdiger (ed.), Conflicts and Cooperation in Managing Environmental Resources, Springer, Berlin, pp. 39–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kaitala, Veijo, Pohjola, Matti and Olli Tahvonen (1992). Transboundary air pollution and soil acidification: a dynamic analysis of an acid rain game between Finland and the USSR, Environmental & Resource Economics, 2, pp. 161–181.Google Scholar
  6. Mäler, Karl-Göran (1989). The acid rain game, in Folmer, Henk and Ekko C. van Ierland (eds.), Valuation Methods and Policy-Making in Environmental Economics, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, pp. 231–252.Google Scholar
  7. Ploeg, Frederick van der (1987). Coordination of optimal taxation in a two-country equilibrium model, Economics Letters, 24, pp. 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ploeg, Frederick van der and Aart J. de Zeeuw (1992). International aspects of pollution control, Environmental & Resource Economics, 2, pp. 117–139.Google Scholar
  9. Ulph, Alistair (1992). The choice of environmental policy instruments and strategic international trade, in: Pethig, Rüdiger (ed.), Conflicts and Cooperation in Managing Environmental Resources, Springer, Berlin, pp. 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frederick van der Ploeg
    • 1
  • Aart J. de Zeeuw
    • 2
  1. 1.University of AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Tilburg UniversityThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations