Assessing Students’ Motivation and Learning Strategies in the Classroom Context: The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire

  • Teresa Garcia
  • Paul R. Pintrich


Current research on student classroom learning stresses the importance of considering both motivational and cognitive components of academic performance (Garcia & Pintrich, 1994; Pintrich & De Groot, 1990). Motivational components include students’ perceptions of the classroom environment as well as their selfrelated beliefs such as personal goals, self-efficacy, interest, and value beliefs. Cognitive components include students’ content knowledge as well as various cognitive learning strategies such as rehearsal, elaboration, and organization, and metacognitive strategies such as planning, monitoring, and regulating learning (Garcia & Pintrich, 1994). Research in both experimental and field settings has consistently shown that positive motivational beliefs such as perceptions of high selfefficacy,a focus on mastery goals, high value and interest in the task or content, and low levels of test anxiety are positively related to greater cognitive engagement in terms of the use of cognitive and metacognitive strategies as well as actual academic performance (see Pintrich & Schrauben, 1992 for a review).


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ames, C. (1992). Classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assor, A., & Connell, J. (1992). The validity of students’ self-reports as measures of performance affecting self-appraisals. In D.H. Schunk & J. Meece, (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 25–47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Bradburn, N. (1983). Response effects. In P. H. Rossi, J. D. Wright, & A. B. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (pp. 289–328). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, W., & Holtzman, W. (1967). Survey of study habits and attitudes. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  5. Carter, K. (1993). The place of story in the study of teaching and teacher education. Educational Researcher, 22 (1), 5–12.Google Scholar
  6. Christensen, F. A. (1968). College adjustment and study skills inventory. Berea, OH: Personal Growth Press.Google Scholar
  7. Converse, J. M., & Presser, S. (1986). Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Corno, L. (1989). Self-regulated learning: A volitional analysis. In B.J. Zimmerman & D.H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 111–141). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (revised edition). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1991, April). Student motivation and self-regulated learning: A LISREL model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  11. Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. In D.H. Schunk & B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 127–153). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Goldman, R., & Warren, R. (1973). Discriminant analysis of study strategies connected with college grade success in different major fields. Journal of Educational Measurement, 10, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Graham, S., & Golan, S. (1991). Motivational influences on cognition: Task involvement, ego involvement, and depth of information processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Howard-Rose, D., & Winne, P. (1993). Measuring component and sets of cognitive processes in self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 591–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1986). LISREL: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood: User’s guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
  17. Lockhart, D, & Schmeck, R. (1984). Learning styles and classroom evaluation methods: Different strokes for different folks. College Student Journal, 17, 94–100.Google Scholar
  18. McKeachie, W. J., Pintrich, P. R., & Lin, Y. G. (1985). Teaching learning strategies. Educational Psychologist, 20, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pintrich, P. R. (1988a). A process-oriented view of student motivation and cognition. In J. Stark & L. Mets (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning through research: New directions for institutional research (Vol. 57, pp. 65–79). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Pintrich, P. R. (1988b). Student learning and college teaching. In R. E. Young & K. E. Eble (Eds.), College teaching and learning: Preparing for new commitments. New directions for teaching and learning (Vol. 33, pp. 71–86). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  21. Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames & M.L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation-enhancing environments (Vol. 6, pp. 117–160).Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  22. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes (Vol. 7, pp. 371–402).Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  24. Pintrich, P. R., McKeachie, J. W., & Lin, Y. G. (1987). Teaching as a course in learning to learn. Teaching of Psychology, 14, 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pintrich, P.R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In D.H. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 149–183). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.Google Scholar
  27. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schunk, D., & Zimmerman, B. (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational application. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Thorkildsen, T., & Nicholls, J. (1991). Students’ critiques as motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 347–368.Google Scholar
  30. Torrance, E. P., Reynolds, C. R., Riegel, T., & Ball, O. (1977). Your style of learning and thinking: Forms A and B. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 21, 563–573.Google Scholar
  31. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315–327). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Weinstein, C. E., Palmer, D. R., & Schulte, A. C. (1987). Learning and study strategies inventory. Clearwater, FL: H&H Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Weinstein, C. E., & Underwood, V. L. (1985). Learning strategies: The how of learning. In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Relating instruction to research (Vol. 1, pp. 241–258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Weinstein, C. E., Zimmerman, S. A., & Palmer, D. R. (1988). Assessing learning strategies: The design and development of the LASSI. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (pp. 25–40). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. Wentland, E. J., & Smith, K. W. (1993). Survey responses: An evaluation of their validity. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zimmerman, B.J., & Schunk D.H. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teresa Garcia
  • Paul R. Pintrich

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations