Functionalism and Multirealizability on Interaction Between Structure and Function

  • Joëlle Proust
Chapter
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 165)

Abstract

Functionalism plays a crucial role in psychology by allowing a precise and hopefully operational definition of a mental state. The main idea of functionalism as the term is employed in psychology is derived from a causal analysis of mental states: the concept of a mental state “involves essentially the idea of a state being able to cause certain effects or to be the effect of certain causes and reduces to it” (Armstrong 1981). What mental states causally determine are behaviors. For example, the desire to read leads one to buy a book, or to go to the library, or more plainly to take a book from the shelf at home and open it. There are two species of causes contributing to determining a mental state; one is the objects and events present in the environment, perceived consciously or not and shaping the behavior of the subject. The second is the other mental states which in interaction with each other induce the mental state considered. For example, the desire to read may be in part due to the sight of a book, the memory of particular work to do, by the belief in the relevance of that book for that work, and so on.

Keywords

Mental State Causal Role Mental Property Propositional Attitude Theoretical Term 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong, D. M. (1990), ‘The Causal Theory of Mind’, in Lycan (ed.) (1990).Google Scholar
  2. Block, N. (1978), ‘Troubles with Functionalism’, in: C. W. Savage (ed.), Perception and Cognition. Issues in the Foundations of Psychology, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, t. 9, 261–325; revised version in Block (ed.) (1980), 268–305.Google Scholar
  3. Block, N. (1980), Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology, vol. 1, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Block, N. & Fodor, J. (1972), ‘What Psychological States are Not’, Philosophical Review 81: 2; revised version in Block (1980a), pp. 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Changeux, J. P. et al. (1973), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 70: 2974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Changeux, J. P. (1992), ‘Les Neurones de la Raison’, La Recherche 244: 704–713.Google Scholar
  7. Crick, F. & Koch, C. (1990), ‘Towards a Neurobiological Theory of Consciousness’, Seminars in the Neurosciences 2: 263–275.Google Scholar
  8. Dennett, D. (1978), Brainstorms. Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology, Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  9. Dennett, D. (1987), The Intentional Stance, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Edelman, G. (1989), The Remembered Present, Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  11. Engel, P. (1992a), Etats D’esprit, Questions de Philosophic de L’esprit, Aix-en-Provence: AlineaGoogle Scholar
  12. Engel, P. (1992b), ‘Actions, Raisons et Causes Mentales’, Revue de Theologie et de Philosophic 124: 305–321.Google Scholar
  13. Fodor, J. (1968), Psychological Explanation, Random House.Google Scholar
  14. Fodor, J. (1981), Representations, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fodor, J. (1988), Psycho semantics, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gardner, H. (1985), The Mind’s New Science, A History of the ognitive Revolution, Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Gould, S. J. & Lewontin, R. (1979), ‘The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme’, Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 205: 581–598.Google Scholar
  18. Jackson, F. & Pettit, Ph. (1990), ‘Programme Explanation: A General Perspective’, Analysis 50(2): 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jacob, P. (1991), ‘Are Mental Properties Causally Efficacious’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 39: 51–73.Google Scholar
  20. Jacob, P. (1992), ‘Le Probleme du Rapport du Corps et de L’esprit Aujourd’hui; Essai sur les Forces et les Faiblesses du Fonctionnalisme’, in: D. Andler (ed.), Introduction aux Sciences Cognitives, Paris: Gallimard, pp. 313–351.Google Scholar
  21. Kim, J. (1972), ‘Phenomenal Properties, Psychophysical Laws and the Identity Theory’, Monist 56(2): 177-192; reprinted in part as ‘Physicalism and the Multiple Readability of Mental States’ in Block (ed.) (1980), pp. 234–236.Google Scholar
  22. Kim, J. (1992), ‘Multiple Realizability and the Metaphysics of Reduction’, Philosophy and Phenomonological Research 52: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lashley, K. (1929), Brain Mechanisms and Intelligence, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lewis, D. (1972), ‘Psychophysical and Theoretical Identifications’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50: 249–258; reprinted in Block (1980a), pp. 207-215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lewis, D. (1980), ‘Mad Pain and Martian Pain’, in Block (ed.) (1980), pp. 216-222.Google Scholar
  26. Lewis, D. (1983), ‘An Argument for Identity Theory’, Philosophical Papers 1: 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Llinas, R. (1987), ‘“Mindness” as a Functional State of the Brain’, in: C. Blakemore & S. Greenfield (eds.), Mindwaves, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Lycan, W. (1987), Consciousness, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lycan, W. (ed.) (1990), Mind and Cognition, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Putnam, H. (1965), ‘Brains and Behavior’, in: R. J. Butler (ed.), Analytical Philosophy,vol. 2, Oxford: Blackwell; reprinted in Block (1980), pp. 24–36.Google Scholar
  31. Putnam, H. (1967), ‘The Nature of Mental States’, in: W. H. Capitan & D. D. Merrill (eds.), Art, Mind and Religion, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 37–48. Reprinted in Block (ed.) (1980), pp. 223–233.Google Scholar
  32. Sober, E. (1990), ‘Putting the Function Back into Functionalism’, in Lycan (ed.) (1990),pp. 97–106.Google Scholar
  33. Tennant, N. (1984), ‘Intentionality, Syntactic Structure and the Evolution of Language’, in: Ch. Hookway (ed.), Minds, Machines & Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Wimsatt, W. C. (1976), ‘Reductionism, Levels of Organization and the Mind-body Problem’, Consciousness and the Brain: A Scientific and Philosophical Inquiry, New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joëlle Proust
    • 1
  1. 1.CREAParisFrance

Personalised recommendations