Nitrogen Fixation: Fundamentals and Applications pp 195-200 | Cite as
Use of the Luciferase (TN5-LUX) Reporter System to Study Rhizobium Meliloti Genes Responding to N/C/O2 Limitation or Plant Factors and Their Role in Rhizosphere Competition
Abstract
The induction of nitrogen-fixing root and stem nodules on leguminous plants by soil bacteria belonging to the Rhizobiaceae is a highly evolved, complex process requiring a fine-tuned interaction between the bacteria and their host. Recently, considerable progress has been made in elucidating the signal exchange between rhizobia and their host plant, leading up to the activation of the microbial nodulation (nod/nol) genes, Nod factor biosynthesis and subsequent Nod factor mediated initiation of nodule ontogeny. Moreover, the molecular basis of rhizobial nitrogen fixation (nif/fix) gene induction in response to physiological cues such as oxygen (and nitrogen) availability has been studied in detail. However, much less is known about the influence of the persistence and competitive ability of rhizobia in the soil and the rhizosphere of plants on the very early stages of rhizobial infection. This is particularly relevant when one is interested in developing improved strains of nitrogen fixing rhizobia, since they tend not to be competitive when reintroduced into the soil or rhizosphere of plants (see Dowling Broughton, 1986).
Keywords
Nitrogen Starvation Plant Factor Rhizobial Population Methanol Dehydrogenase Rhizobial InfectionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- de Bruijn FJ (1992) Appl. Environm. Microbiol. 58, 2180–2187.Google Scholar
- de Bruijn FJ, Rossbach SR (1994) In Gerhardt P et al., eds, Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology, ASM Press, Washington DC, pp 387–405.Google Scholar
- Cebolla A et al. (1993) Appl. Environm. Microbiol. 59, 2511–2519.Google Scholar
- Dowling DN, Broughton WJ (1986) Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 40, 131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Givskov et al. (1994) J. Bacteriol. 176, 4816–4824.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gray TRG (1976) Symp. Gen. Microbiol. 26, 327–364.Google Scholar
- Jansson JK (1995) Curr. Top. Biotech., In pressGoogle Scholar
- Kjelleberg S et al. (1987) Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 41, 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kragelund L et al. (1995) FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., In PressGoogle Scholar
- Lim PO et al. (1993) In Guerrero R and Pedros-Alio C, eds., Trends in Microbial Ecology, Spanish Society for Microbiology, pp 97–100Google Scholar
- Lynch JM (1988) In Lynch JM and Hobbes JE, eds, Microorganisms in Action: Concepts and Applications in Microbial Ecology, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK, pp. 103–131Google Scholar
- Matin A (1991) Mol. Microbiol. 5, 3–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Meighen EA (1991) Microbiol. Rev. 55, 123–142.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meighen EA, Dunlap PV (1993) Adv. Microbial Physiol. 34, 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Metting B (1985) In Cheremisinoff PA and Ovellette RP, eds, Biotechnology: Applications and Research, Technomic Publishers, Lancaster PA., pp. 196–214Google Scholar
- Moeller A et al. (1994) FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 15, 193–206.Google Scholar
- Nystrom et al. (1990) J. Bacteriol. 172, 7085–7097.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Phillips DA et al. (1995) This volumeGoogle Scholar
- Prosser JI (1994) Microbiol. 140, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rossbach SR et al. (1994) Mol. Gen. Genet 245, 11–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shields JA et al. (1973) Soil Biol. Biochem. 5, 753–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spector MP and Cubitt CL (1992) Mol. Microbiol. 6, 1467–1476.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Versalovic J et al. (1994) Meth. Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 25–40.Google Scholar
- Wolk et al. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 5355–5359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar