Molecular Characterization of the Interaction Between the Fungal Pathogen Cladosporium Fulvum and Tomato

  • Guy Honée
  • Guido F. J. M. van den Ackerveken
  • Henk W. J. van den Broek
  • Ton J. Cozijnsen
  • Matthieu H. A. J. Joosten
  • Richard Laugé
  • Miriam Kooman-Gersmann
  • Jacques Vervoort
  • Ralph Vogelsang
  • Paul Vossen
  • Jos P. Wubben
  • Pierre J. G. M. de Wit
Part of the Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture book series (PSBA, volume 21)

Abstract

The fungus Cladosporium fulvum is a biotrophic leaf pathogen of tomato which is the only host it can infect. The infection is initiated by conidia on leaves which germinate, produce runner hyphae and invade stomata without the formation of appressoria, three days post inoculation [1]. Mycelium grows abundantly in the intercellular space between mesophyll cells, where the fungus remains during the main part of its life cycle. Twelve to fourteen days after inoculation, the fungus emerges from the stomata and forms conidiophores producing conidia which may start a new disease cycle. Since the fungus develops in the intercellular space without forming specialized feeding structures such as haustoria, and does not visibly affect the leaf tissue, C.,fulvum co-exists in a highly balanced relationship with tomato. Pathogenicity factors, required to grow in planta and to prevent, or to inactivate, host defence responses, are supposed to play an important role to accomplish and/or maintain basic compatibility. Many different physiologic races of C. fulvum are known, each carrying a different subset of avirulence genes. Resistance genes of tomato have been identified genetically of which several are available in near-isogenic lines of Lycopersicon esculentum cv. MoneyMaker. The outcome of the C. fulvum-tomato interaction can be described by the gene-for-gene model; interaction between a physiologic race of C. fulvum containing an avirulence gene and a tomato cultivar harbouring the complementary resistance gene results in incompatibility. Incompatibility is characterized by appearance of a hypersensitive response (HR), a rapid death of cells surrounding the infection site which prevents further growth of the fungal pathogen and eventually results in resistance. How the fungus accomplishes and maintains compatibility during a successful infection, and which molecular processes determine incompatibility are the main questions to be answered.

Keywords

Fungal Pathogen Intercellular Space Lycopersicon Esculentum Tomato Cultivar Avirulence Gene 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    : De Wit PJGM. A light and scanning-electron microscopic study of infection of tomato plants by virulent and avirulent races of Cladosporium fulvum. Neth J Plant Path 1977;83:109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    : Joosten MHAJ, De Wit PJGM. Isolation, purification and preliminary characterization of a protein specific for compatible Cladosporium fulvum (syn Fulvia fulva)-tomato interactions. Physiol Molec Plant Pathol 1988;33:241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    : Wubben JP, Joosten MHAJ, De Wit PJGM. Expression and localization of two in planta induced extracellular proteins of the fungal tomato pathogen Cladosporium fulvum. Molec Plant-Microbe Interact 1994;7:000–000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    : Van den Ackerveken GFJM, Van Kan JAL, Joosten MHAJ, Muiser JM, Verbakel HM, De Wit PJGM. Isolation and characterization of two putative pathogenicity genes of Cladosporium fulvum. Molec Plant-Microbe Interact 1993;6:210–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    : Bazan JF. Emerging families of cytokines and receptors. Current Biol 1993;3:603–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    : Marmeisse R, Van den Ackerveken GFJM, Goosen T, De Wit PJGM, Van den Broek HWJ. The in planta induced ecp2 gene of the tomato pathogen Cladosporium fulvum is not essential for pathogenicity. Curr Genet 1994, in press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    : De Wit PJGM, Spikman G. Evidence for the occurrence of race and cultivar-specific elicitors in intercellular fluids of compatible interactions of Cladosporium fulvum and tomato. Physiol Plant Pathol 1982;21:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    : De Wit PJGM, Hofuran AE, Velthuis GCM, Kúc JA. Isolation and characterization of an elicitor of necrosis isolated from intercellular fluids of compatible interactions of Cladosporium fulvum (syn Fulvia fulva) and tomato. Plant Physiol 1985;77:642–647.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    : Scholtens-Toma IMJ, De Wit PJGM. Purification and primary structure of a necrosis-inducing peptide from the apoplastic fluids of tomato infected with Cladosporium fulvum (syn Fulvia fulva). Physiol Molec Plant Pathol 1988;33;59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    : Van Kan JAL, Van den Ackerveken GFJM, De Wit PJGM. Cloning and characterization of CDNA of avirulence gene avr9 of the fungal tomato pathogen Cladosporium fulvum, causal agent of tomato leaf mold. Molec Plant-Microbe Interact 1991;4:52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    : Van den Ackerveken GFJM, Van Kan JAL, De Wit PJGM. Molecular analysis of the avirulence gene avr9 of Cladosporium fulvum fully supports the gene-for-gene hypothesis. The Plant J 1992;2:359–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    : Van den Ackerveken GFJM, Dunn RM, Cozijnsen TJ, Vossen JPMJ, Van den Broek HWJ, De Wit PJGM. Nitrogen limitation induces expression of the avirulence gene avr9 in the tomato Cladosporium fulvum. Mol Gen Genet 1994;243:277–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    : Marmeisse R, Van den Ackerveken GFJM, Goosen T, De Wit PJGM, Van den Broek HWJ. Disruption of the avirulence gene avr9 in two races of the• tomato pathogen Cladosporium fulvum causes virulence on tomato genotypes with the complementary resistance gene Cf9. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 1993;6:412–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    : Joosten MHAJ, Cozijnsen TJ, De Wit PJGM. Host resistance to a fungal tomato pathogen lost by a single base-pair change in an avirulence gene. Nature 1994a;367: 384–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    : Santa Cruz S, Baulcombe DC. Molecular analysis of Potato Virus X isolates in relation to the potato hypersensitivity gene NX. Molec Plant-Microbe Interact 1993;6:707–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    : De Wit PJGM. Molecular characterization of gene-for-gene systems in plant-fungus interactions and the application of avirulence genes in control of plant pathogens. Ann Rev Phytopathol 1992;30:391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    : Lamb CJ, Lawton MA, Dron M, Dixon RA. Signals and transduction mechanisms for activation of plant defense against microbial attack. Cell 1989;56:215–224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    : Joosten MHAJ, De Wit PJGM. Identification of several pathogenesis-related proteins in tomato leaves inoculated with Cladosporium fulvum (syn Fulvia fulva) as 1,3-ß-glucanases and chitinases. Plant Physiol 1989;89:945–951.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    : Van Kan JAL, Joosten MAHJ, Wagemakers CAM, Van den Berg-Velthuis G, De Wit PJGM, Differential accumulation of mRNAs encoding extracellular and intracellular PR proteins in tomato induced by virulent and avirulent races Cladosporium fulvum. Plant Molec Biol 1992;20:513–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    : Danhash N, Wagemakers CAM, Van Kan JAL, De Wit PJGM. Molecular characterization of four chitinase cDNAs obtained from Cladosporium fulvum-infected tomato. Plant Molec Biol 1993;22:1017–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    : Wubben JP, Lawrence CB, MHAJ, De Wit PJGM. Differential induction of PR protein gene expression in tomato by Cladosporium fulvum and its race-specific elicitors. 1994b, submitted.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    : Wubben JP, Joosten MHAJ, Van Kan JAL, De Wit PJGM. Subcellular localization of plant chitinases and 1,3–1i-glucanases in Cladosporium fulvum (syn Fulvia fulva)-infected tomato leaves. Physiol Molec Plant Pathol 1992;41:23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    : Joosten MHAJ, Verhakel HM, Nettekoven ME, Van Leeuwen J, Van Der Vossen RTM, De Wit PJGM. The fungal pathogen Cladosporium fulvum is not sensitive to chitinase and 1,3-ßglucunase defence proteins of its host, tomato. 1994, submitted.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    : Hammond-Kosack KE, Jones DA, Jones JDG. Identification of two genes required in tomato for full Cf-9-dependent resistance to Cladosporium fulvum. The Plant Cell 1994;6: 361–374.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    : Vera-Estrella R, Blumwald E, Higgins VJ. Effect of specific elicitors of Cladosporium fulvum on tomato suspension cells. Plant Physiol 1992;99:1208–1215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    : Felix G, Regenass M, Boller T. Specific perception of subnanomolar concentrations of chitin fragments by tomato cells: induction of extracellular alkalinization, changes in protein phosphorylation, and establishment of a refractory state. The Plant J 1993;4:307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    : Sacks WR, Ferriera P, Hahlbrock K, Jabs T, Nürnberger T, Renelt A, Scheel D. Elicitor recognition and intracellular signal transduction in plant defence In: Nester EW, Verma DPS, ediitors. Advances in Molecular Genetics of Plant-microbe Interactions. Vol 2. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993:485–495.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    : Vera-Estrella R, Blumwald E, Higgins VJ. Non-specific glycopeptide elicitors of Cladosporium fulvum: evidence fur involvement of active oxygen species in elicitor-induced effects on tomato cell suspensions. Physiol Molec Plant Pathol 1993;42:9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    : Van den Ackerveken GFJM, Vossen P, De Wit PJGM. The AVR9 race-specific elicitor of Cladosporium fulvum is processed by endogenous and plant proteases. Plant Physiol 1993h;103:9l-96.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guy Honée
    • 1
  • Guido F. J. M. van den Ackerveken
    • 2
  • Henk W. J. van den Broek
    • 3
  • Ton J. Cozijnsen
    • 1
  • Matthieu H. A. J. Joosten
    • 1
  • Richard Laugé
    • 3
  • Miriam Kooman-Gersmann
    • 1
  • Jacques Vervoort
    • 4
  • Ralph Vogelsang
    • 1
  • Paul Vossen
    • 1
  • Jos P. Wubben
    • 1
  • Pierre J. G. M. de Wit
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhytopathologyWageningen Agricultural University, Binnenhaven 9Wageningen PDThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institut des Sciences VégétalesCNRS Avenue de la TerrasseGif-sur-YvetteFrance
  3. 3.Department of GeneticsWageningen Agricultural UniversityWageningen HAThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of BiochemistryWageningen Agricultural UniversityWageningen HAThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations