Role of Surface Factors in Plant-Microbe Interactions: Involvement of Rhizobium Meliloti Exopolysaccharide During Early Infection Events in Alfalfa

  • John A. Leigh
  • David G. Barker
  • Etienne-Pascal Journet
  • Georges Truchet
Part of the Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture book series (PSBA, volume 21)


Substances secreted by bacteria play important roles in their interactions with plants. For example, in the N2-fixing symbiosis involving legumes and rhizobia, secreted signals are now known to be essential for eliciting certain key steps in root nodulation. In pathogenic interactions, one expects to find secreted toxins and degradative enzymes, as well as factors that protect the bacteria from plant defense responses. In both types of interactions, polymers or substances that adhere to cell surfaces might also participate in physical interactions such as the disruption of plant tissues or attachment. Substances that remain associated with the cell surface would act in the immediate vicinity of the bacterial cell, while those that diffuse away from the cell could act at a distance. This article discusses secreted substances that are often termed “surface factors”, including both exopolysaccharides (EPSs) and lipopolysaccharides (LPSs). While these substances probably do function in many cases as cell-associated factors, they can also be found in the intercellular milieu and so could also function at a distance. Surface factors involved in plant-microbe interactions have been discussed in several review articles [1-4].


Cell Surface Plant Pathology Plant Tissue Bacterial Cell Defense Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Leigh JA, Coplin DL. Exopolysaccharides in plant-bacterial interactions. Annu Rev Microbiol 1992; 46:307–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Noel KD. Rhizobial polysaccharides required in symbiosis with legumes. In: Verma DPS, editor. Molecular signals in plant-microbe communications. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1992: 341–357.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gray JX, de Maagd RA, Rolfe BG, Johnston AWB, Lugtenberg BJJ. The role of the Rhizobium cell surface during symbiosis. In: Verma DPS, editor. Molecular signals in plant-microbe communications. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1992: 359–376Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leigh JA, Walker GC. Exopolysaccharides of Rhizobium: synthesis, regulation and symbiotic function. TIG 1994; 10:63–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Perotto S, Brewin NJ, Kannenberg EL. Cytological evidence for a host defense response that reduces cell and tissue invasion in pea nodules by lipopolysaccharidedefective mutants of Rhizobium leguminosarum strain 3841. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 1994; 7:99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Trigalet-Demery D, Montrozier H, Orgambide G, Patry V, Adam O, Navarro L, Cotelle V, Trigalet A. Exopolysaccharides of Pseudomonas solanacearum: Relation to virulence. In: Hartman GL, Hayward AC, editors. Bacterial wilt. Proceedings of an international conference held at Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 28–31 October 1992. Brisbane, Australia: Watson Ferguson and Company, 1993: 312–315Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Denny TP, Baek S-R. Genetic evidence that extracellular polysaccharide is a virulence factor of Pseudomonas solanacearum. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 1991; 4:198–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schoonejans E, Expert D, Toussaint A. Characterization and virulence properties of Erwinia chrysanthemi lipopolysaccharide-defective, 4EC2-resistant mutants. J Bacteriol 1987; 169:4011–4017.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Puvanesarajah V, Schell FM, Stacey G, Douglas CJ, Nester EW. A role for 2linked-ß-D-glucan in the virulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol 1985; 164:102–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leigh JA, Reed JW, Hanks JF, Hirsch AM, Walker GC. Rhizobium meliloti mutants that fail to succinylate their Calcofluor-binding exopolysaccharide are defective in nodule invasion. Cell 1987; 51:579–587.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Battisti L, Lara JC, Leigh JA. A specific oligosaccharide form of the Rhizobium meliloti exopolysaccharide promotes nodule invasion in alfalfa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89:5625–5629.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Urzainqui A, Ahmann D, Walker GC. Exogenous suppression of the symbiotic deficiencies of Rhizobium meliloti exo mutants. J Bacteriol 1992; 174:3403–3406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Djordjevic SP, Chen H, Batley M, Redmond JW, Rolfe BG. Nitrogen fixing ability of exopolysaccharide synthesis mutants of Rhizobium sp NGR234 and Rhizobium trifolii is restored by the addition of homologous exopolysaccharides. J Bacteriol 1987; 169:53–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Alfen NK. Reassessment of plant wilt toxins. Annu Rev Phytopath 1989; 27:533–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Metzger M, Bellemann P, Bugert P, Geider K. Genetics of galactose metabolism of Erwinia amylovora and its influence on polysaccharide synthesis and virulence of the fire blight pathogen. J Bacteriol 1994; 176:450–459.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang C, Signer ER, Hirsch AM. Nodules initiated by Rhizobium meliloti exopolysaccharide mutants lack a discrete, persistent nodule meristem. Plant Physiol 1992; 98:143–151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pichon M, Journet E-P, Dedieu A, de Billy F, Truchet G, Barker DG. Rhizobium meliloti elicits transient expression of the early nodulin gene ENOD12 in the differentiating root epidermis of transgenic alfalfa. Plant Cell 1992; 4:1199–1211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leigh JA, Signer ER, Walker GC. Exopolysaccharide-deficient mutants of Rhizobium meliloti that form ineffective nodules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985; 82:6231–6235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leong SA, Williams PH, Ditta GS. Analysis of the 5’ regulatory region of the gene for S-aminolevulinic acid synthetase of Rhizobium meliloti. Nucl Acids Res 1985; 13:5965–5976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boivin C, Camut S, Malpica CA, Truchet G, Rosenberg C. Rhizobium meliloti genes encoding catabolism of trigonelline are induced under symbiotic conditions. Plant Cell 1990; 7:1157–1170. Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Journet EP, Pichon M, Dedieu A, de Billy F, Truchet G, Barker DG. Rhizobium meliloti Nod factors elicit cell-specific transcription of the ENOD12 gene in transgenic alfalfa. Plant J 1994; in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • John A. Leigh
    • 1
    • 2
  • David G. Barker
    • 1
  • Etienne-Pascal Journet
    • 1
  • Georges Truchet
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire des Relations Plantes-MicroorganismesINRA-CNRSCastanet-TolosanFrance
  2. 2.Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations