Form and Strategy in Science pp 66-81 | Cite as
The Relationship Between Formalised Languages and Natural Language
Abstract
I have selected the present topic as it seems to be the one on which contemporary British Analytic Philosophy most strikingly disagrees with related currents in scientific philosophy both on the European Continent and in the United States. This choice does not imply any wish on my part to attack British Analytic Philosophy. In fact, my information about this movement is too fragmentary to justify any such intention. But I do hope that the following observations may elicit a fruitful discussion on some problems of major importance, the more so as the subject in itself is still highly controversial both in Europe and in America.
Keywords
Natural Language Semantic Theory Pure Mathematic Symbol System Formal CalculusPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
- Bar-Hillel, Y. (1), ‘Analysis of “Correct Language” ’, Mind 55 (1946).Google Scholar
- Beth, E. W. (1), ‘Critical Epochs in the Development of the Theory of Science’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1 (1950).Google Scholar
- Beth, E. W. (2), La crise de la raison et la logique, Paris - Louvain, 1957.Google Scholar
- Beth, E. W. (3), ‘Über Lockes “Algemeines Dreieck” ’, Kant-Studien 48 (1957).Google Scholar
- Beth, E. W. (4), The Foundations of Mathematics, Amsterdam, 1959.Google Scholar
- Black, M. (1), ‘The Semantic Definition of Truth’, Analysis 8 (1948).Google Scholar
- Carnap, R. (1), The Logical Syntax of Language, New York - London, 1937.Google Scholar
- Carnap, R. (2), Meaning and Necessity, Chicago, I11., 1947.Google Scholar
- Carnap, R. (3), ‘Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4 (1950).Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1), ‘Mr. Strawson’s Analysis of Truth’, Analysis 10 (1950).Google Scholar
- Dugas, L. (1), Le psittacisme et la pensée symbolique - Psychologie du nominalisme, Paris, 1896.Google Scholar
- Frege, G. (1), Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik, Breslau, 1884.Google Scholar
- Greenwood, D. (1), Truth and Meaning, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
- Leibniz, G. W. (1), ‘Nouveaux essais sur l’entendement humain’ in R. E. Raspe (ed.), Oeuvres philosophiques de Leibnitz, Amsterdam - Leipzig, 1765.Google Scholar
- Mannoury, G. (1), Les deux pôles de l’esprit, Paris, 1933.Google Scholar
- Mannoury, G. (1), Les fondements psycho-linguistiques des mathématiques, Bussum - Neuchâtel, 1947.Google Scholar
- Moore, G. E. (1), ‘Russell’s “Theory of Descriptions” ’ in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, Evanston - Chicago, 1944.Google Scholar
- Russell, B. (1), The Principles of Mathematics, 2nd. ed. London - New York, 1938.Google Scholar
- Russell, B. (2), Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, London, 1919.Google Scholar
- Russell, B. (3), ‘The Cult of “Common Usage” ’, The British Journal of Philosophy 3 (1952).Google Scholar
- Rüstow, A. (1), Der Lügner, Erlangen, 1908; Leipzig, 1910.Google Scholar
- Ryle, G. (1), ‘The Theory of Meaning’ in C. A. Mace (ed.), British Philosophy in the Mid-Century, London, 1957.Google Scholar
- Stegmüller, W. (1), Das Wahrheitsproblem und die Idee der Semantik, Wien, 1957.Google Scholar
- Strawson, P. F. (1), ‘Truth’, Analysis 9 (1949).Google Scholar
- Tarski, A. (la), Pojçcie prawdy w jçzykach nauk dedukcyjnych, Warszawa, 1933.Google Scholar
- Tarski, A. (lb), ‘Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen’, Studia philosophic 1 (1936).Google Scholar
- Tarski, A. (lc), ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’ in Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, translated by J. H. Woodger, Oxford, 1956.Google Scholar
- Tarski, A. (2), ‘The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4 (1944).Google Scholar
- Whitehead, A. N. (1), Adventures of Ideas, Harmondsworth, 1948.Google Scholar
- Whitehead, A. N. and Russell, B. (1), Principia Mathematica, 2nd. ed., Cambridge, 1947.Google Scholar