Philosophies of Reflection and Philosophy of Spirit

  • Thomas Koenig
Chapter

Abstract

Authentic philosophy reflects the age in which it is rooted as project as well as the past from which it is born. The search for truth will necessarily concern itself, in a special way, with the philosophical problems that define the particular “kairos” of the times. For the true philosopher will strive to meet the challenge which each age brings, to pass on the historical heritage new-formed, so that the future might reap the results of his own work.

Keywords

Historical Perspective Moral Idealism Existential Philosophy Transcendental Idealism Spiritual Personalism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cf. G. Bastide, La condition humaine, p. 3.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cf. G. Bastide, La condition humaine, p. 3.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thus is it an attempt to ground subjectivity in metaphysics. Cf. J. Robert, “Descartes,” p. 378 where he notes the influence of Descartes and before him Plotinus and St. Augustine.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cf. for example J. Nabert’s answer’s to objections in his article previously cited in the Encyclopédie française, p. 19.06-2 to 19.06-3.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cf. M. Sauvage, Socrate (Coll. “Maitre spirituels” 9), Paris, Seuil, 1956, pp. 163–164.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cf. M. Sauvage, Socrate (Coll. “Maitre spirituels” 9), Paris, Seuil, 1956, p. 164–166.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cf. G. Bastide, Traité, pp. 208–209 and Méditations, pp. 15–17.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Bastide, La condition humaine, pp. 319–323.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cf. G. Bastide, Traité, pp. 353–366.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cf. F. Copleston, Contemporary Philosophy, London, 1963 (4th ed.), p. 139.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cf. A. Dondeyne, “L’historicité dans la philosophie contemporaine,” Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 1956 (54), p. 471. Cf. G. Bastide, Traité, p. 131.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Bastide, Traité, p. 138.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cf. J. Robert, “Descartes,” p. 381.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cf. L. Lavelle, De L’intimité spirituelle, Paris, Aubier, 1955, p. 270.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cf. A. Forest, “La signification du recueillement,” in Encyclopédie française, p. 19.08-10. Cf. also G. Madinier, Conscience et signification, Paris, P.U.F., p. 28 where Madinier clearly distinguishes two kinds of reflection, one intentional and another which is not able to “analyse the object about which it is thinking, but is able to understand the act which it accomplishes in thinking; here we are dealing with a thought reflecting back on itself in order to grasp itself in its own activity.”Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cf. Georges Bastide, La conversion spirituelle, p. 70.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Forest, “La signification,” p. 19.08-10. Also Cf. Madinier, Conscience, pp. 29, 30, 46.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cf. A. Forest, “La signification,” op. cit., p. 19.08-11.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    “If the subject is consciousness of the world and is nothing more than this intentionality which projects the subject towards things, then we can no longer speak of possession of oneself nor coincidence with oneself. There is no interior man, says M. Ponty. Consciousness has no interiority, says J. P. Sartre.” G. Madinier, Conscience, p. 28; cf. also p. 48.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cf. G. Bastide, Traité, pp. 202 and 831.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    “If man reflects, it is in order to realize an authentic existence... the meta-physical function of the act of reflection is to awaken the moral consciousness to the source of value.” G. Bastide, Méditations, p. 144; Traité, p. 106.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cf. J. Nabert, Encyclopédie française, p. 19.04-15.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cf. J. Nabert, Encyclopédie française, p. 19.04-15.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    I.e., the conditions of the appearance of things to the subjectivity of man, the conditions for the very life of man himself to whom things appear.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cf. p. 119.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cf. A. Etcheverry, L’Idéalisme, p. 97.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cf. A. Etcheverry, L’Idéalisme, p. 131.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cf. J. Nabert, Encyclopédie française, 19.04-16.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Encyclopédie française, J. Nabert, 19.04-16.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cf. G. Bastide, La conversion spirituelle, p. 88; Les grands thèmes, pp. 129 ss.; “Le malin génie,” pp. 238–240.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cf. J. Nabert, Encyclopédie française, p. 19.04-16.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cf. G. Bastide, La conversion spirituelle, p. viii.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    “Without going so far, as some, to deny too easily the distinction of the two orders, we admit, that for our part, the spiritual conversion and transfiguration of values characterizing the person can give us the key to this twofold register, empirical and prereflexive on one hand, idealist and spiritual on the other; in such a way that, keeping the fundamental insight of Kant, namely, the reflexive connection between duty conceived as universal law and freedom conceived as autonomy, we can translate the interior moral life of the person without giving occasion to the criticisms so often addressed to Kant when he was accused of rationalism in the pejorative sense of the word, of formalism, rigorism or fideism.” G. Bastide, Traité, p. 151; cf. also pp. 149–163.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cf. J. Nabert, Encyclopédie française, p. 19.04-16.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    “The work of reflection is not to leave outside one another the interiority of consciousness and the universality of reason.” J. Nabert, Encyclopédie française, p. 19.04-16.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cf. for example the interpretation of Descartes in the Grands thèmes, pp. 140–141 where Bastide speaks of his “speculative voluntarism and his practical intellectualism,” which becomes the model for his own philosophy. Cf. also La condition humaine, pp. 274 ss. and Traité, p. 152.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cf. A. Etcheverry, Idéalisme, pp. 22–37.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cf. G. Bastide, Traité, p. 189; La condition humaine, pp. 313–315.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cf. J. Nabert, Encyclopédie française, p. 19.04-16.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cf. I. Alain, Souvenirs concernant Jules Lagneau, p. 136 cited by J. Nabert, Encyclopédie française, p. 19.04-16.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cf. J. Nabert, Id. Google Scholar
  42. 42.
  43. 43.
  44. 44.
    J. Lachelier, Lettres, #81 cited by Nabert, id. Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cf. J. Nabert, Id. Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cf. G. Bastide, La condition humaine, p. 304.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Cf. G. Bastide, La condition humaine, pp. 293–305.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cf. G. Bastide, La condition humaine, p. 305.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
  50. 50.
  51. 51.
    Id., p. 306: “... it cannot be grasped except from within, in its very own life.”Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    G. Bastide, “Nature, situation et condition humaine,” in Existence et Nature, Paris, 1962, pp. 51–64.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    We will discuss this in detail in part two. For a brief summary cf. G. Bastide, Traité, p. 87 ss. Also chapters II and III of La conversion spirituelle.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Cf. G. Madinier, Conscience, p. 40–41.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Cf. J. Nabert, Encyclopédie française, p. 19.05-16.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Id., p. 19.06-1.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Cf. G. Bastide, La conversion spirituelle, p. 86.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Cf. G. Bastide, La condition humaine, p. 317.Google Scholar
  59. 58.
  60. 60.
    Cf. J. Nabert, Encyclopédie française, p. 19.06-1.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Cf. G. Bastide, La condition humaine, p. 318.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Cf. G. Bastide, La condition humaine, p. 319.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Id., p. 323.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    J. Nabert, Encyclopédie française, pp. 19.04-16 and 19.06-01.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    J. Nabert, Encyclopédie française, p. 19.06-1.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    J. Nabert, Encyclopédie française, p. 19.06-1.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
  68. 68.
    Cf. G. Madinier, Conscience, p. 6 and passim.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Cf. G. Bastide, Méditations, esp. the eight and ninth meditations.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    J. Nabert, Encyclopédie française, p. 19.06-2.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Cf. G. Bastide, “De la situation de l’homme et des fonctions de la philosophie,” in Les Philosophes français d’aujourd’hui, textes collected and presented by G. Deledalle et D. Huisman, France, 1963, p. 256.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Cf. R. Le Senne, “De la philosophie de l’esprit,” in L’activité philosophique, pp. 116–121.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Id., p. 126.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Cf. E. Morot-Sir, “La philosophie de l’esprit,” in Encyclopédie française, p. 19.06-11.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Cf. R. Le Senne, Introduction à la Philosophie (Coll. “Logos”) Paris, P.U.F., 1939, p. 3.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Cf. A. Forest, “De l’idéalisme au spiritualisme,” Giomale metafisica, 1955 (10), p. 438: “Spiritualism finds itself in accord with this vision (philosophy of value) of philosophy and it finds in it its final justification.”Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Cf. Chapter I.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Cf. G. Bastide, Le moment historique de Socrate, Paris, 1939, p. 87.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Cf. G. Bastide, Le moment, Paris, 1939, p. 192; also: Les grands thèmes, p. 140.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    “It is not a question of knowing things, but realizing ideas.” G. Bastide, La condition humaine, p. 375.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Cf. J. Lacroix, Encyclopédie française, p. 19.04-3.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Cf. G. Bastide, “La nature, la conscience et la Vie de l’esprit,” in Actes du VII Congrès des sociétés de philosophie de langue française, Paris, P.U.F., 1954, pp. 25–33.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    “A mediation of the paradoxes in regards to the object of metaphysics leads us to propose that the object of metaphysics resides: in freedom, which presides over the opposition between Being and Nothing; in the constituting act of consciousness which manifests this freedom; in value which endows the act with authenticity.” G. Bastide in Les philosophes, p. 256, op. cit. Cf. also Traité, p. 356 and La condition humaine, p. 323.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Cf. G. Bastide, Méditations, p. 172; Traité, pp. 229–235.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    “... idealism seems to us to be the intellectual mediation by which philosophy is able to become a spiritualism, a philosophy of Spirit.” R. Le Senne, Introduction à la philosophie, p. 87; Cf. also A. Forest, “De l’idéalisme au spiritualisme,” p. 433.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Cf. Chapter II.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Cf. A. Forest, “De l’idéalisme au spiritualisme,” p. 437.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    “Man is the one who can take a stand for authentic existence.” G. Bastide, Méditations, p. 157Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Cf. G. Bastide, Le moment, p. 208; Méditations, pp. 60ss.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Cf. A. Forest, “De l’idéalisme,” p. 438.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Cf. G. Bastide, Méditations, I, pp. 1–17. These points will be treated in detail in the following sections.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Cf. A. Forest, “De l’idéalisme,” p. 439.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Cf. Chapter III, p. 111. Cf. also E. Morot-Sir: “De l’idéalisme à l’axiologie,” Giornale de Metafisica, 1955 (10), p. 463.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Cf. E. Morot-Sir, “De l’idéalisme,” p. 463–464.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Cf., E. Morot-Sir, “De l’idéalisme,” p. 465.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Cf. La conversion spirituelle, pp. 70–85.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Cf. G. Bastide, La conversion spirituelle, p. 70.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Cf. La condition humaine, pp. 375–382 and La conversion spirituelle, pp. 71–72.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    “Spiritual personalism is the normal and unequivocal outcome of moral idealism...,” G. Bastide, La conversion spirituelle, p. 86. For Bastide’s relationship to other personalisms see pp. 125–127 of his Traité. He identifies himself with the personalisms in the tradition of J. Nabert and G. Madinier.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Cf. G. Bastide, Les grands thèmes, p. 140 and La conversion, p. 78.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    G. Bastide, Les philosophes, p. 256.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Cf. G. Bastide, Traité, p. 357.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Id., p. 379.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Id., pp. 382–386.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Id., p. 443. Cf. also Les philosophes, p. 256. In short, we can say that there are two dynamics of the human situation — one of alienation and one of authentic freedom, one which ascends to the realization of the person and one which descends towards moral decay.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    We have in the philosophies of spirit the same effort to escape the notion of spirit as structure. It is an attempt to surpass in moral philosophy the formalism of the categorical imperative by describing the human situation as tension rather than dialectics or structure. For both Le Senne and Bastide it is the effort of the will which can restore at any moment the actuality of consciousness and authentic reflection. As Bastide puts it, spiritual conversion admits of varying degrees and is dependent on an effort of the will as well as the light of reflexion (Cf. G. Bastide, “Esquisse d’une Axiologie de la Personne,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 1944 (2), p. 106).Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Cf. especially G. Bastide, Méditations, pp. 117–193.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Koenig

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations