Advertisement

Critical Remarks

  • Richard M. Zaner
Chapter
  • 96 Downloads
Part of the Phaenomenologica book series (PHAE, volume 17)

Abstract

It is most difficult to entertain many serious objections to a body of thought as fresh and original as Marcel’s. Inspired by a rare intellectual integrity and exigence for truth and clarity, he unquestionably ranks as one of the major figures in contemporary philosophy. Because of this, though, those who take it on themselves to examine such work in a critical manner, however constructively, must always, it seems, appear to themselves as not a little pretentious. On the other hand, just because such a thinker discloses hitherto unsuspected horizons and dimensions of our experience, it becomes possible and even necessary for others to “see for themselves” what has thus been opened up; and, thus, it becomes possible to accept the invitation to “check” the philosophical insights with the phenomena themselves. Just as Descartes invited the critical minds of his day (those who were willing and able, he states in his Preface to the Meditations, to set aside their own beliefs and prejudices) to read through with him the course of his thought, and thereby see for themselves the legitimacy of his claim to have discovered a new territory, so, too, Marcel gives us an open invitation to follow along with him.

Keywords

Component Process Mutual Foundedness Critical Remark Critical Mind Respective Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Prini, op. cit., p. 7.Google Scholar
  2. 1.
    See, for example, Husserl, Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Zweites Buch, Husserliana, Band IV, Martinus Nijhoff (Haag, 1952), pp. 236–47.Google Scholar
  3. 1.
    Cf. Husserl, Cartesian Meditations, op. cit., §§ 38–39.Google Scholar
  4. 1.
    Cf. Husserl, Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Erstes Buch, M. Niemeyer (Halle a.d.S., 1913), § 92.Google Scholar
  5. 2.
    Cf. Husserl, Formale und Transzendentale Logik, M. Niemeyer (Halle a.d. S., 1929), §§ 3 and 4.Google Scholar
  6. 3.
    Cf. Husserl, Erfahrung und Urteil, Red. und Hrsgn. von L. Landgrebe, Ciaassen Verlag (Hamburg, 1954), pp. 73–74.Google Scholar
  7. 2.
    Cf. Husserl, Ideen, II, op. cit., pp. 56, 128.Google Scholar
  8. 1.
    Cf. Ideen, II, pp. 57–58, 128.Google Scholar
  9. 1.
    Ideen, II, op. cit., p. 144. This, indeed, explains the mediatizing role which the body has according to Marcel.Google Scholar
  10. 2.
    Ibid., pp. 151–52.Google Scholar
  11. 3.
    Cf. Cartesian Meditations, op. cit., § 44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard M. Zaner

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations