Conclusion: The New York Press, 1914–1917

  • Kevin J. O’Keefe

Abstract

Throughout the foregoing chapters, the data presented has pointed in the direction of a challenge to a major interpretation of the reasons behind the American decision of April 6, 1917. This interpretation, generally called “revisionist” or “disillusionist,” is the product of the investigations of numerous historians, writers, and scholars. It might be useful here to briefly summarize the basic revisionist thesis on American intervention in the First World War.1

Keywords

Daily Newspaper American Newspaper Press Situation Bodleian Library American Press 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    The following discussion is based largely upon the major works of the revisionist authors, especially Edwin Borchard and W. P. Lage, Neutrality for the United States (New Haven, 1940)Google Scholar
  2. 1a.
    Charles A. Beard, The Devil Theory of War (New York, 1936)Google Scholar
  3. 1b.
    C. Harley Grattan, Why We Fought (New York, 1929)Google Scholar
  4. 1c.
    Walter Millis, Road to War: America, 1914–1917 (Boston, 1935)Google Scholar
  5. 1d.
    H. G. Peterson, Propaganda for War: The Campaign Against American Neutrality, 1914–1917 (Norman, Oklahoma, 1939)Google Scholar
  6. 1e.
    G. C. Tansill, America Goes to War (Boston, 1938).Google Scholar
  7. 2.
    Borchard and Lage, Neutrality for the United States, 86.Google Scholar
  8. 3.
    Hubert Herring, And So To War (New York, 1938), 111.Google Scholar
  9. 4.
    Peterson, Propaganda for War, 6.Google Scholar
  10. 5.
    Peterson, Propaganda for War, 6; Cf. supra, 11.Google Scholar
  11. 18.
    The Brooklyn Daily Eagle, April 18, 1915.Google Scholar
  12. 19.
    Hebert Memorandum.Google Scholar
  13. 21.
    The World, March 11, 1917.Google Scholar
  14. 22.
    Carnegie Endowment, Official German Documents, I, 433.Google Scholar
  15. 24.
    Press Memorandum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin J. O’Keefe
    • 1
  1. 1.CharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations