The European of the Year 2000

From an Ideal Image to a Socio-Cultural Project
  • Marcel Bolle De Bal
Chapter

Abstract

The theme of this study is apparently clear but conceals an initial problem: are we going to talk about the “image of man” in 2000, or the image of “man in 2000”?

Keywords

Ideal Image European Culture Methodological Process Religious System Double Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    cf. R. K. Merton, Eléments de méthode sociologique, Paris, Plon, 1953, pp. 169 et ss.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Henri Van Lier, Le nouvel âge, Tournai, Casterman, 1964, p. 219.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carl Rogers, Le développement de la personne, Paris, Dunod, 1968, p. 25.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Henri Van Lier, op. cit., P. 219.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    cf. Zygmunt Bauman, “Image de l’homme dans la sociologie moderne: quelques remarques d’ordre méthodologique,” Revue de l’Institut de sociologie, Bruxelles, 1968, no. 4, pp. 113–115.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    cf. G. Mendel, La révolte contre le pére, Paris, Payot, 1969, p. 160.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    cf. Michel Foucault, Les mots et les choses, Gallimard, Paris, 1969.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. K. Galbraith, Le nouvel é tat industriel, Gallimard, Paris, 1969.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Mendel, op. cit., PP. 144–163.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L’ homme standard, special issue of Esprit, 1959, no. 3.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. F. Whyte, L’ homme de l ’organisation, Paris, Plon, 1959, 568 p.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Henri Van Lier, op. cit., p. 221.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gilbert Simondon, Du mode d’existence des objets techniques, Paris, Aubier, 1958.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Henri Van Lier, op. cit.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    David Riesman, La foule solitaire, Paris, Arthaud, 1964.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    cf. Revue prospective no. 15, L’ homme encombré, Paris, PUF, 1969, 151 p.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Joseph Folliet, “L’avènement de Promethee,” Lyon, C hronique sociale de france, 1950, p. 22.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Henri Janne, Le système social, Bruxelles, 1968, p. 401.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marshall Mcluhan, Pour comprendre les Media, Paris, Ed. du Seuil, 1968, 390 p.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Betty Friedan, La femme mystifiée, Ed. Gonthier, Genève 1964, 239 p.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Edgar Morin, Le cinéma et l ’h omme imaginaire, Paris, Ed. de Minuit, 1956; Les Stars, Paris, Le Seuil, 1957.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Joseph Folliet, op. cit., P. 26.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    cf. Edgar Morin, Introduction à une politique de l’homme, Paris, Ed. du Seuil, pp. 54 et ss.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    cf. Michel Crozier, Le phénomene bureaucratique, Paris, Le Seuil, 1963, 413 p.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    cf. Max Pages, La vie affective des groupes, Paris, Dunod, 1968, 508 p.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    cf. Emile Cornez, Problemes de l’humanisme contemporain Möns, 1964.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Donald Michael, “Un conquerant silencieux: la cybernation” in Guy Roustang, La seconde societe industrielle, Paris, Les Editions Ouvrieres, 1967, p. 43.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Herbert Marcuse, Eeros et civilisation, Paris, Edit, de Minuit, 1963, pp. 143–144.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Id. p. 146.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jacques Delors, “Risques et chances de la liberte ä l’ere industrielle,” in Guy Roustang, op. cit., p. 165.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    J.M. Albertini, “La societe industrielle, aventure ambigue,” in Guy Roustang,op. cit., p. 168.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    cf. Adam Schaff, Le marxisme et l’individu, Paris, Librairie Armand Colin, pp. 189–190.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Especially of A. H. Maslov, Motivation and personality, New-York, Harper and Bros, 1954.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    cf. Bertrand de Jouvenel, Arcadie, essais sur le mieux vivre, Paris, Futuribles, SEDEIS, 1968, 388 p.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    cf. G. MENDEL, La revolte contre le pere, esp. pp. 390–391 et 423–424.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    cf. Henri Laborit, L’homme imaginant, Paris, 1970.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jean Fourastie et J. P. Courtheoux envisage; an “essentially multiplied” man. cf. Jean Fourastie et J. P. Courtheoux, “Reflexions prospectives,” in La civilisation des loisirs, bruxelles, 1967, p. 250.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    For more details cf. G. Mendel, op. cit., pp. 9–30 et 365–423.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dennis Gabor, Inventing the future, Pelican Book, p. 111.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcel Bolle De Bal

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations