Advertisement

Generative Grammar and European Linguistics

  • Manfred Bierwisch
Part of the Foundations of Language book series (FLSS, volume 13)

Abstract

The development of the theory of generative grammar during the past fifteen years has led not only to considerable improvements in successive stages, but also to alternative proposals with respect to certain problems of theoretical interest. This concerns in particular the relation between syntax and semantics, where at present at least three different approaches are under lively discussion. None of these alternatives, investigating different possibilities within the general framework of generative transformational grammar, can be taken, however, as representing a separate ‘school’. It is also impossible to localize them in any geographical sense. They are simply detailed explorations of alternative hypotheses necessary for an empirically motivated clarification and extension of the theory under discussion. This leads to certain difficulties in the delimitation of the subject matter for the present chapter. Although since the early sixties an increasing number of linguists in Europe have been attracted by the theory of generative grammar, they do not form in any serious sense a particular trend or school or anything of this kind that could be contrasted to corresponding research done elsewhere in the world. Hence the heading Generative Grammar in Western Europe does not specify a coherent and selfcontained topic. It would thus be a rather extrinsic approach to the subject of the present paper, if I simply tried to report on some European contributions to research based on the principles of generative grammar.

Keywords

Context Free Grammar Generative Grammar Semiotic System Grammatical Rule Universal Grammar 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bech, G.: 1955, Studien über das deutsche Verbum infinitum, 1. Band, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  2. Bierwisch, M.: 1966, ‘Strukturalismus, Geschichte, Probleme und Methoden’, Kursbuch V, Frankfurt/Main, pp. 77–152.Google Scholar
  3. Bierwisch, M.: 1967, ‘Some Semantic Universals of German Adjectivals’, Foundations of Language 3, 1–36.Google Scholar
  4. Chomsky, N.: 1955, The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, MIT-Library Micro-film.Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky, N.: 1957, Syntactic Structures, The Hague.Google Scholar
  6. Chomsky, N.: 1963, ‘Formal Properties of Grammars’, Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 323–418 (ed. by Luce, Bush, and Galanter ), New York.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, N.: 1964, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, The Hague.Google Scholar
  8. Chomsky, N.: 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chomsky, N.: 1966a, Cartesian Linguistics, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, N.: 1966b, ‘Topics in the Theory of Generative Grammar’, Current Trends in Linguistics, Vol. 3, pp. 1–60 (ed. by Sebeok), The Hague.Google Scholar
  11. Chomsky, N.: 1968, Language and the Mind, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Chomsky, N. and Halle, M.: 1965, ‘Some Controversial Questions in Phonological Theory’, Journal of Linguistics 1, 97–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chomsky, N. and Halle, M.; 1968, The Sound Pattern of English, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Chomsky, N.: forthcoming, Deep Structure, Surface Structure, and Semantic Interpretation.Google Scholar
  15. Gaifman, C.: 1965, ‘Dependency Systems and Phrase-Structure Systems’, Information and Control 8, 304–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Halle, M.: 1959, The Sound Pattern of Russian, The Hague.Google Scholar
  17. Hays, D. G.: 1964, ‘Dependency Theory: A Formalism and some Observations’, Language 40, 511–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hjelmslev, L.: 1929, Principes de Grammaire Générale, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  19. Hjelmslev, L.: 1935, La Catégorie des Cas, Part I, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  20. Hjelmslev, L.: 1938, ‘Essai d’une théorie des morphèmes’, Actes IV e Congrès international de linguistes 1936, pp. 140–51, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  21. Hjelmslev, L.: 1953, Prolegomena to a Theory of Language, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  22. Hjelmslev, L.: 1954, ‘La Stratification du Language’, Word 10, pp. 163–188.Google Scholar
  23. Jakobson, R.: 1936, ‘Beitrag zur allgemienen Kasuslehre’, Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6, 240–88.Google Scholar
  24. Johnson, C. D.: unpublished, Formal Aspects of Phonological Description, Dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
  25. Katz, J. J.: 1966, The Philosophy of Language, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Katz, J. J.: 1967, ‘Recent Issues in Semantic Theory’, Foundations of Language 3, 124–94.Google Scholar
  27. Katz, J. J. and Fodor, J. A.: 1963, ‘The Structure of a Semantic Theory’, Language 39, 170–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Katz, J. J. and Postal, P. M.: An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Description, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Langendoen, T. D.: 1968, The London School of Linguistics: A Study of the Linguistic Theories of B. Malinowsky and J. R. Firth, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. McCawley, J. D.: 1968a, ‘The Role of Semantics in a Grammar’, Universals in Linguistic Theory (ed. by Bach and Harms), New York, pp. 124–69.Google Scholar
  31. McCawley, J. D.: 1968b, ‘Can you Count Pluses and Minuses before you can Count?’, Chicago Journal of Linguistics 2, 51–56.Google Scholar
  32. McCawley, J. D.: 1968c, ‘Concerning the Base Component of a Transformational Grammar’, Foundations of Language 4, 243–69.Google Scholar
  33. Peters, S.: 1969, ‘The Use of Context-Sensitive Rules in Immediate Constituent Analysis’, International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  34. Postal, P. M.: 1964, Constituent Structure: a Study of Contemporary Models of Syntactic Description, Bloomington, Ind., and The Hague.Google Scholar
  35. Postal, P. M.: 1966, ‘Review Article (André Martinet, Elements of General Linguistics)’, Foundations of Language 2, 151–86.Google Scholar
  36. Postal, P. M.: 1968, Aspects of the Theory of Phonology, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Projet: 1931, ‘Projet de Terminologie Phonologique Standardisée’, Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 4, 309–23.Google Scholar
  38. Stanley, R.: 1967, ‘Redundancy Rules in Phonology’, Language 43, 393–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tesnière, L.: 1959, Elements de Syntaxe Structurale, Paris.Google Scholar
  40. Togeby, K.: 1951, Structure de la Langue Française Immanente, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  41. Trier, J.: 1931, Der deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  42. Uldall, H. J.: 1957, Outline of Glossematics, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  43. Weisgerber, L.: 1953, Vom Weltbild der deutschen Sprache, Düsseldorf.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manfred Bierwisch

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations