The Optimum Strategy Matrix and Indonesian Administrative Reforms

  • Djunaedi Hadisumarto
  • Gilbert B. Siegel
Chapter
Part of the Institute of Social Studies book series (ISDS, volume 1)

Abstract

In defining administrative reform, Hahn-Been Lee (1970:177–189) makes the distinction between innovation and reform. Reform is characterised by a value orientation that is different than merely recognising the possibility that a new process or concept can be applied to a particular situation (innovation): ‘In the administrative context the advocacy role is more important than the originating role’. He defines administrative reform as: ‘an effort to apply new ideas and combinations of ideas to an administrative system with a conscious view to improving the system for positive goals of national development’. We define administrative reform similarly in this study as: conscious efforts at planned administrative improvements to facilitate the formulation and implementation of development plans.

Keywords

Gross Domestic Product Civil Servant Political Climate Budgetary Power State Enterprise 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Badan Administrasi Kepegawaian Nasional (1972) (National Public Personnel Bureau), ‘Informal Survey of Educational Levels of the Civil Service, 60% SampleGoogle Scholar
  2. A. C. Brackman, Indonesia: The Gestapu Affair (New York, American-Asian Exchange, 1969).Google Scholar
  3. A. Djamin, ‘Perabaikan Administrasi Negara Untuk Perbaikan Ekonomi’, Simposium Masalah Ekonomi Beserta Pemecahannya (Jakarta, Senat Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia, 1968).Google Scholar
  4. H. Feith, The Decline of Constitutional Democracy in Indonesia (Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
  5. C. Geertz, ‘Religious Belief and Economic Behavior in a Central Javanese Town: Some Preliminary Considerations’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 4, 2 (1955–56), 134–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. C. Geertz, The Development of the Javanese Economy: A Socio-Cultural Approach (Cambridge, Mass., Center for International Studies, MIT, 1956).Google Scholar
  7. C. Geertz, The Social History of An Indonesian Town (Cambridge, Mass., MIT, 1965).Google Scholar
  8. D. Hadisumarto, ‘The Indonesian Civil Service and Its Reform Movements’ (DPA dissertation, Los Angeles, University of Southern California, 1974).Google Scholar
  9. D. Hindley, ‘Indonesia 1971: Pantjasila Democracy and the Second Parliamentary Elections’, Asian Survey 12, 1 (1973), 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Resident Staff in Indonesia, Progress Report on the Utilisation of Aid (Jakarta, 1972).Google Scholar
  11. H.-B. Lee, ‘An Application of Innovation Theory to the Strategy of Administrative Reform in Developing Countries’, Policy Sciences 1, 2 (1970), 177–180. Lembaga Demografi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia (Jakarta, 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. G. Majur, ‘Pegawai Negeri Kita’, Mimbar Indonesia (February 1952).Google Scholar
  13. S. Mangkusuwondo, Prospek Perekonomian Indonesia 1972 (Jakarta, Lembaga Peyelidikan Ekonomi dan Masyarakat Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia, 1972).Google Scholar
  14. S. Mangkusuwondo, ‘Proyeksi Makro Perekonomian Indonesia’, in S. B. Joedono (ed.), Prospek Perekonomian Indonesia 1973 (Jakarta, Lembaga Penyelidikan Ekonomi dan Masyarakat Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas, 1973).Google Scholar
  15. A. H. Nasution, Toward a People’s Army (Jakarta, V. C. Delegasi, 1964).Google Scholar
  16. M. Natsir, ‘A Review of Indonesia’s Reconstruction’, Indonesian Review 1, 1 (1951). 52.Google Scholar
  17. L. Pye, ‘Bureaucratic Development and the Psychology of Institutionalisation’, in R. Braibanti (ed.), Political and Administrative Development (Durham, Duke University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
  18. M. Sadli, ‘Indonesia’s Experience with the Application of Technology and its Employment Effects’, Ekonomi dan Keuangan Indonesia 21, 3 (1973), 147–160.Google Scholar
  19. T. Smith (1971a), ‘The Indonesian Bureaucracy — Stability, Change and Productivity’ (Ph.D. dissertation, Berkeley, University of California).Google Scholar
  20. T. Smith (1971b), ‘Corruption, Tradition and Change’, Indonesia 11 (April 1971), 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. S. Soemardjan, ‘Bureaucratic Organisation in a Time of Revolution’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 2 (September 1957), 182–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. B. Tjokroamidjojo, ‘Administrative Improvement for Development: The Indonesian Experience’ (Jakarta, Bappenas; mimeograph, 1970).Google Scholar
  23. Wilopo J (Cabinate), Keterangan dan Djawaban Pemerintah atas Program Kabinet Wilopo (Jakarta, 1952).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Djunaedi Hadisumarto
  • Gilbert B. Siegel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations