Symmetries of the Solar Dynamo: Comparing Theory With Observation

  • John M. Brooke
  • Jaan Pelt
  • Pentti Pulkkinen
  • Ilkka Tuominen
Part of the NATO Science Series book series (NAII, volume 26)

Abstract

Since the discovery by Schwabe in 1843 of the cyclic nature of sunspot activity, there has been a great deal of attention paid to the nature of these cycles. In 1849 Wolf established a measure of sunspot activity, the Wolf number, defined as W = k(10g + f where g is the number of sunspot groups, f is the total number of spots and k is a factor allowing comparison between different observation series. Based on this measure we have the Zurich series of Wolf numbers which extends back to 1749. Since the counts for W are taken over the whole visible surface of the sun, all information about the spatial distribution of the sunspot activity is lost. Realising the importance of such spatial information, Carrington in 1853 began the recording of the latitudes and longitudes of spots and this eventually resulted in the Greenwich series of photographic recordings of the solar surface which lasted from 1874 to 1976. Maunder introduced the famous Maunder or butterfly diagram (so called because the pattern of the cycles resembles the wings of a butterfly) which shows spot activity as a travelling wave beginning in the higher latitudes and proceeding to the equator.

Keywords

Solar Cycle Sunspot Group Maunder Minimum Magnetic Equator Wolf Number 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ashwin, P., Covas, E.O., Tavakol, R.K., 1999, Nonlinearity, 9, 563MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brooke, J.M., Europhys. Lett., 1997, 37(3), 171MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brooke, J.M., Pelt, J., Tavakol, R., Tworkowski, A., 1998, Astron. & Astrophys., 332, 339ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carbonell, M., Oliver, R., Ballester, J.L., 1993, Astron. & Astrophys. 274, 497ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Golubitsky, M., Stewart, L, Schaeffer, M., Singularities and groups in bifurcation theory, Springer Verlag, London, 1988MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jennings R.L., Weiss N.O., 1991, Mon. Not. R. Ast. Soc. 252, 249ADSMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knobloch E., Landsberg A.S., 1996, Mon. Not. R. Ast. Soc, 278, 294ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pelt, J., Irregularly Spaced Data Analysis, 1992, Helsinki University Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pelt, J., Brooke, J.M., Pulkinnen, P., Tuominen, I., to appear in Astron. Astrophys.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pulkkinen, R, Finnish Meteorological Report No 23, Helsinki, 1998 (also Ph.D. thesis for University of Helsinki)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pulkinnen, P., Brooke, J.M., Pelt, J., Tuominen, I., 1999, Astron. & Astrophys., 341, L43ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tobias, S.M., 1997, Astron. & Astrophys., 322, 1007ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Knobloch, E., Tobias, S.M., Weiss, N.O., 1998, Mon. Not. R. Ast. Soc, 297, 1123ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ribes, J.C., Nesme-Ribes, E., 1993, Astron. & Astrophys., 276, 549ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Verma, V.K., 1993, Astrophys. J., 403, 797ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • John M. Brooke
    • 1
  • Jaan Pelt
    • 2
  • Pentti Pulkkinen
    • 3
  • Ilkka Tuominen
    • 4
  1. 1.MRCCS, Manchester ComputingUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.Tartu ObservatoryEstonia
  3. 3.Academy of FinlandHelsinkiFinland
  4. 4.Astronomy DivisionUniversity of OuluOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations