Defects and Undulation in Layered Liquid Crystals
Abstract
Many systems, such as lamellar liquid crystals, block copolymers, ferrofluids and ferromagnets posses a one-dimensional periodic order. Cholesteric liquid crystals with large periodicity (say, 10 microns) represent a model system that allows one to directly determine layer configurations under a polarizing microscope and thus to study various elastic phenomena. We review recent studies of the so-called cholesteric “fingerprint textures” as an experimental model of two elastic effects: (1) distortions of the order parameter around an elementary edge dislocation and (2) undulations of layers in the magnetic field. Elastic distortions caused by the edge dislocation can be properly described only when the elastic free energy is supplemented by a non-linear term. Fitting the dislocation profile allows one to measure the penetration length of the system. With the known penetration length, one can verify the scenario of layers undulations in the magnetic field. The experiments reveal that the displacement of layers above the undulations threshold is much larger than the one expected from the Helfrich-Hurault theory which assumes that the boundaries impose infinitely strong surface anchoring. A revised theory that accounts for a finite surface anchoring for a bounded lamellar system fits the experimental data well. The feature of finite surface anchoring allows one to find an analytical description of undulations well above the threshold field, namely, the transformation of sinusoidal layer distortions into the saw-tooth distortions and reorientation of layers at the bounding substrates at very high fields.
Keywords
Liquid Crystal Edge Dislocation Free Energy Density Cholesteric Liquid Crystal Penetration LengthPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M., Course of Theoretical Physics, Statistical Mechanics, Part1, (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1980)Google Scholar
- 2.Chaikin, P.M. and Lubensky, T.C., (1995) Principles of Condensed Matter Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Holyst, R. (1991) Phys. Rev. A, 44, 3692.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Helfrich, W. (1971) J. Chem. Phys. 55, 839; Hurault, J.P. (1973) J. Chem. Phys. 59, 2068.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Kleman, M. and Lavrentovich, O.D. (2001) Soft Matter Physics: An Introduction. Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
- 6.Weatherburn, C.E., (1961) Differential Geometry of Three Dimensions, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- 7.Grinstein, G. and Pelcovits, R.A. (1982) Phys. Rev. A, 26, 915.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Brener, E.A. and Marchenko, V.I. (1999) Phys. Rev. E, 59, R4752.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Nallet, F., Roux, D. and Prost, J., (1989) Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 276.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.de Gennes, P.G. and Prost, J., (1992) Physics of Liquid Crystals, 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- 11.Lubensky, T.C. (1972) Phys. Rev. A, 6, 452.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Kats, E.I. and Lebedev, V.V. (1993) Fluctuational Effects in the Dynamics of Liquid Crystals. Springer-Verlag, New York, 170pp.Google Scholar
- 13.Sonin, A.A. (1950) The Surface Physics of Liquid Crystals. Gordon and Breach Publishers, Luxembourg, 180pp.Google Scholar
- 14.Quilliet, C., Blanc, C. and Kleman, M. (1996) Phys. Rev. Lett., 77, 522.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Lavrentovich, O.D., Quilliet, C. and Kleman, M.,J. (1997) Phys. Chem. B, 101, 420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Sutton, A.P. and Balluffi, R.W. (1996) Interfaces in Crystalline Materials. Oxford Science Publications, Clarendon Press, 820pp.Google Scholar
- 17.Durand, G. (1993) Liq. Cryst., 14, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Li, Z. and Lavrentovich, O.D. (1994) Phys. Rev. Lett., 73, 280.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Lavrentovich, O.D. and Yang, D.-K. (1998) Phys. Rev. E, 57, R6269.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Lavrentovich, O.D. (1986) Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 91, 1666 [(1986) Sov. Phys. JETP, 64, 984.]Google Scholar
- 21.Fournier, J.B. and Durand, G. (1991) J. Phys. II France, 1, 845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Friedel, J. (1964) Dislocations. Pergamon press, Oxford.MATHGoogle Scholar
- 23.Kleman, M. (1983) Points, Lines and Walls. John-Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
- 24.Holyst, R. and Oswald, P. (1995) Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 9, 1515.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.de Gennes, P.G. (1972) C. R. Seances Acad. Sci. Ser. B, 275, 939.Google Scholar
- 26.Maaloum, M., Ausserre, D., Chatenay, D., Coulon, G. and Gallot, Y. (1992) Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1575.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Turner, M. S., Maaloum, M., Ausserre, D., Joanny, J-F. and Kunz, M. (1994) J. Phys. II France, 4, 689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Wethank M. Kleman for the illuminating consultations on the available results about the dislocation structures. See also reference [31] for the discussion of dislocation in materials with small and large rigidity.Google Scholar
- 29.Ishikawa, T. and Lavrentovich, O.D. (1999) Phys. Rev. E, 60, R5037.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Subacius, D., Shiyanovskii, S.V., Bos, P. and Lavrentovich, O.D. (1997) Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 3323.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Kleman, M. (1988) Liq. Cryst., 3, 1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Williams, C.E. and Kleman, M. (1974) J. Phys. Lett France, 35, L33.Google Scholar
- 33.Clark, N.A. and Meyer, R.B (1973) Appl. Phys. Lett., 22, 493.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Fukuda, J. and Onuki, A. (1995) J. Phys. II France, 5, 1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Ribotta, R. and Durand, G. (1977) J. Physique, 38, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Eq.17 is often written with a coefficient 4√2 instead of 8; we found the coefficient 8 to be correct.Google Scholar
- 37.Delaye, M., Ribotta, R. and Durand, G. (1973) Phys. Lett. A, 44, 139.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Rondelez, F. (1971) C.R. Acad. Sci. B, 273, 549.Google Scholar
- 39.Moncton, D. E., Pindak, R., Davey, S.C. and Brown, G. (1982) S., Phys. Rev. Lett., 49, 1865.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Gharbia, M., Cagnon, M. and Durand, G. (1985) J. Phys.Lett. France, 46, L683.Google Scholar
- 41.Molho, P., Porteseil, J.L., Souche, Y., Gouzerh, J. and Levy, J.C.S. (1987) Appl. Phys. Lett., 61, 4188.Google Scholar
- 42.Seul, M. and Wolfe, R. (1992) Phys. Rev. A, 46, 7519; (1992) Phys. Rev. Lett., 68, 2460; (1992) Phys. Rev. E, 46, 7519 and 7534.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Elias, F., Flament, C., Bacri, J.-C. and Neveu, S. (1997) J. Phys. I France, 7, 711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Wang, Z.G. (1994) J. Chem. Phys., 100, 2298.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Cohen, Y., Albalak, R.J., Dair, B.J., Capel, M.S. and Thomas, E.L. (2000) Macromolecules, 33, 6502.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Ishikawa, T. and Lavrentovich, O.D., Technical Reports 10 169pp, ALCOM Symposium Chiral Materials and Applications, February 18-19, 1999; (2001) Phys. Rev. E, 63, 030501 (R).Google Scholar
- 47.Flament, C., Bacri, J.C., Cebers, A., Elias, F. and Perzynski, R. (1996) Europhys Lett., 34, 225.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Singer, S.J. (1993) Phys. Rev. E, 48, 2796.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I.A. (1965) Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover, New York.Google Scholar