On the Importance of Reliable Background Concentrations of Ozone for Regional Scale Photochemical Modelling

  • Bärbel Langmann
  • Susanne E. Bauer
Chapter

Abstract

Ozone throughout the troposphere is subject of significant temporal and spatial variability due to photochemical production in the planetary boundary layer and free troposphere, stratospheric intrusions, convective events and long range transport. However, high resolving observations of ozone in the troposphere are generally rare today. That is of special disadvantage for limited area models, which represent mathematically a differential equation system with an initial and boundary problem. As ozone concentrations usually increase from the earth surface to the stratosphere, a proper choice of the background ozone concentrations is necessary to reproduce or even predict the amount and distribution of ozone in a specific region of interest.

In this paper the impact of background concentrations of ozone on regional scale model results is analysed during a summer smog episode over Europe. For this purpose ozone is artificially partitioned into individual categories. For each category, transport and chemical transformation is calculated separately. Initial and boundary concentrations of ozone dominate total ozone concentrations increasingly with height. But also in the planetary boundary layer they contribute with more than 30% to the total ozone changes and are therefore far from being negligible. Moderately modified assumptions of background ozone concentrations reveal an uncertainty of near surface ozone concentrations of 5–15% depending on the weather situation.

Key words

background concentrations ozone regional modelling vertical mixing 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andronache, C., Chameides, W. L., Rodgers, M. O., Martinez, J. E., Zimmermann, P. R., and Greenberg, J., 1994: Vertical distribution of isoprene in the lower boundary layer of the rural and urban southern United States, J. Geophys. Res. 99, 16989–17000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brost, R. A., 1988: The sensitivity to input parameters of atmospheric concentrations simulated by a regional chemical model, J. Geophys. Res. 93, 2371–2387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang, J. S., Brost, R. A., Isaksen, S. A., Madronich, S., Middleton, P., Stockwell, W. R., and Walcek, C. J., 1987: A three-dimensional Eulerian acid deposition model: Physical concepts and formulation, J. Geophys. Res. 92, 14 681–14 700.Google Scholar
  4. Crutzen, P. J., 1995: Ozone in the troposphere, in I. S. A. Isaksen (ed.), Composition, Chemistry and Climate of the Atmosphere, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
  5. Daum, P. H., Lawrence, L. L., Hills, A. J., Lazrus, A. L., Leslie, A. C. D., Busness, K., and Boatman, J., 1990: Measurements and interpretation of concentrations of H2O2 and related species in the upper Midwest during summer, J. Geophys. Res. 95, 9857–9871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elbern, H., Schmidt, H., and Ebel, A., 1997: Variational data assimilation for tropospheric chemistry modeling, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 15 967–15 985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Forster, C., James, P., Wotowa, G., Wandinger, U., Mattis, I., Aishausen, D., Simmonds, P., O’Doherty, S., Jennings, S. G., Kleefeld, C., Schneider, J., Trickl, T., Kreipl, S., Jaeger, H., and Stohl, A., 2001: Transport of boreal forest fire emissions from Canada to Europe, submitted to J. Geophys. Res. Google Scholar
  8. Gao, D., Stockwell, W. R., and Milford, J. B., 1996: Global uncertainty analysis of a regional scale gas phase mechanism, J. Geophys. Res. 101, 9071–9078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Graf, H.-F., Feichter, J., and Langmann, B., 1997: Volcanic sulfur emissions: Estimate of source strength and ist contribution to the global sulfate distribution, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 10727–10738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guenther, A. B., Monson, R. K., and Fall, R., 1991: Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability: Observations with eucalyptus and emission rate algorithm development, J. Geophys. Res. 96, 10799–10808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guenther, A. B., Zimmermann, P. R., Harley, P. C., Monson, R. K., and Fall, R., 1993: Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability: Model evaluation and sensitivity analysis, J. Geophys. Res. 98, 12 609–12 617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hass, H., 1991: Description of the EURAD chemistry-transport-model version 2 (CTM2), Report 83, Institute of Geophysics and Meteorology, University of Cologne, Germany.Google Scholar
  13. Hassel, D., Jost, P., Weber, F. J., Dursbeck, F., Sonnenborn, K.-S., and Plettau, D., 1995: Das Abgas-Emissionsverhalten von Nutzfahrzeugen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Bezugsjahr 1900, Technischer Überwachungsverein Rheinland. Erich Schmidt Verlag. Berichte Umweltbundesamt 5/95. Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  14. Jeuken, A. B. M., Siegmund, P. C., Heijboer, L. C, Feichter, J., and Bengtsson, L., 1996: On the potential of assimilating meteorological analyses in a global climate model for the purpose of model validation, J. Geophys. Res. 101, 16939–16950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kühlwein, J. R. Friedrich, Obermeier, A., and Theloke, J., 1999: Abschätzung und Bewertung der Unsicherheiten hochauflösender NOx und NMVOC-Emissionsdaten. PEF Projekt Bericht. Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung (IER), Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
  16. Lamarque, J.-F, Brasseur, G. P., Hess, P. G., and Müller, J.-F, 1996: Three-dimensional study of the relative contributions of the different nitrogen sources in the troposphere, J. Geophys. Res. 101, 22 955–22 968.Google Scholar
  17. Langmann, B., 2000: Numerical modelling of regional scale transport and photochemistry directly together with meteorological processes, Atmos. Environ. 34, 3585–3598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Madronich, S., 1987: Photodissociation in the atmosphere, I. Actinic flux and the effect of ground reflections and clouds, J. Geophys. Res. 92, 9740–9752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Majewski, D., 1991: The Europa Modell of the Deutscher Wetterdienst, Seminar proceedings ECMWF, 2, pp. 147–191.Google Scholar
  20. Mellor, B. and Yamada, T., 1974: A hierachy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers, J. Atmos. Sci. 31, 1791–1806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oltsman, S. J., Levy II, H., Harries, J. M., Merrill, J. T., Moody, J. L., Lathrop, J. A., Cuevas, E., Trainer, M., O’Neill, M. S., Prospero, J. M., Vömel, H., and Johnson, B. J., 1996: Summer and spring ozone profiles over the North Atlantic from ozonesonde measurements, J. Geophys. Res. 101, 29179–29200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parrish, D. D., Holloway, J. S., Trainer, M., Murphy, P. C, Forbes, G. L., and Fehsenfeid, F. C., 1993: Export of North American ozone pollution to the North Atlantic Ocean, Science 259, 1436–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Placet, M., Mann, C. O., Gilbert, R. O., and Niefer, M. J., 2000: Emissions of ozone and precursors from stationary sources: A critical review, Atmos. Environ. 34, 2183–2204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roeckner, E., Arpe, K., Bengtsson, L., Christoph, M., Claussen, M., Duemenil, L., Esch, M. Giorgetta, M., Schlese, M., and Schulzweida, U., 1996: The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM-4: Model description and simulation of present-day climate, MPI Report No. 218, Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
  25. Schaller, E. and Wenzel, A., 2000: Evaluierung regionaler atmosphrischer Chemie-Transport-Modelle, Lehrstuhl für Umweltmeteorologie, Brandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus, Germany.Google Scholar
  26. Smolarkiewitz, P. K., 1983: A simple positive definite advection scheme with small implicit diffusion, Mon. Wea. Rev. 111, 479–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stockwell, W. R., Middleton, P., Chang, J. S., and Tang, X., 1990: The second generation regional acid deposition model: Chemical mechanism for regional air quality modelling, J. Geophys. Res. 95, 16343–16367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stohl, A. and Trickl, T., 1999: A textbook example of long-range transport: Simultaneous observation of ozone maxima of stratospheric and North American origin in the free troposphere over Europe, J. Geophys. Res. 104, 30445–30462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tiedtke, M., 1989: A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models, Mon. Wea. Rev. 117, 1778–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Umweltbundesamt, 2000: Hintergrundinformation: Sommersmog, Berlin, Germany. (Available from http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/uba-info-daten/daten/sommersmog.htm)
  31. Walcek, C. J. and Taylor, G. R., 1986: A theoretical method for computing vertical distributions of acidity and sulfate production within cumulus clouds, J. Atmos. Sci. 43, 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wesley, M. L., 1989: Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models, Atmos. Environ. 23, 1293–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bärbel Langmann
    • 1
  • Susanne E. Bauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck Institut für MeteorologieHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations