Advertisement

Preparing Mathematics Education Researchers for Disciplined Inquiry: Learning from, in, and for Practice

  • Jo Boaler
  • Deborah Loewenberg Ball
  • Ruhama Even
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 10)

Abstract

In this chapter we consider what it takes to learn to conduct research in mathematics education. We argue that learning any complex practice requires opportunities to unpack its components in order to see what underlies competence performance. Many of the components of successful research remain implicit and are left to new researchers to glean from finished products. In this chapter we consider: What is it that accomplished scholars do as they conduct research? What are the practices in which they engage? What is it that they have to mobilize, consider, try, and carry out? We unpack the work of research, considering such domains as reading, writing, moving from particular observations to general insights, and communicating through multiple media. We propose that focusing on these practices of research offers a promising avenue for the preparation of beginning scholars.

Keywords

Teacher Education Pedagogical Content Knowledge Mathematics Education Research Education Researcher Subject Matter Knowledge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Artigue, M. (1999). The teaching and learning of mathematics at the university level: Crucial questions for contemporary research in education. Notices of the AMS, 46(11), 1377–1385.Google Scholar
  2. Balacheff, N. (1990). Towards a problématique for research on mathematics teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 258–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, D. L. (1988). Knowledge and reasoning in mathematical pedagogy: Examining what prospectiveteachers bring to teacher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90, 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ball, D. L. (1991). Research on teaching mathematics: Making subject matter part of the equation. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 1–48). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 83–104). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
  7. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners. In L. Darling-Ham- mond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Ball, S. J. (1995). Intellectuals or technicians? The urgent role of theory in educational studies. British Journal of Educational Studies, 43(3), 255–271.Google Scholar
  9. Batanero, M. C., Godino, J. D., Steiner, H. G., & Wenzelburger, E. (1994). The training of researchers in mathematics education: Results from an international survey. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernstein, B. (1966). Sources of consensus and disaffection in education. Journal of the Association of Assistant Mistresses, 17(1), 4–11.Google Scholar
  11. Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  12. Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b, October). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 139–148.Google Scholar
  14. Boaler, J. (2000). Intricacies of knowledge, practice, and theory. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1–18). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
  15. Boaler, J. (2002a). Learning from teaching: Exploring the relationship between ‘reform’ curriculum and equity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(4), 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boaler, J. (2002b). Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Brousseau, G. (1984). The crucial role of the didactical contract in the analysis and construction of situations in teaching and learning mathematics. In H. G. Steiner (Ed.), Theory of mathematics education (pp. 110–119). Bielefeld Germany: Institut für Didactik der Mathematik der Universität Bielefeld.Google Scholar
  18. Brown, A., & Dowling, P. (1998). Doing research/reading research: A mode of interrogation for education. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  19. Carlsen, W. S. (in press). Domains of teacher knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  20. Cheung, K. C. (1988). Outcomes of schooling: Mathematics achievement and attitudes towards mathematics learning in Hong Kong. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19, 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & McNeal, B. (1992). Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 573–604.Google Scholar
  22. Cobb, P. (2000). The importance of a situated view of learning to the design of research and instruction. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 45–82). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
  23. Cronbach, L. J., & Suppes, P. (Eds.). (1969). Research for tomorrow’s schools: Disciplined inquiry for education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Dossey, J., & Lappan, G. (2000). The mathematical education of mathematics educators in doctoral programs in mathematics education. In R. E. Reys & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), One field, many paths: U.S. doctoral programs in mathematics education (CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, Vol. 9, pp. 67–72). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
  25. Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research, 53(2), 159–199.Google Scholar
  26. Doyle, W. (1988). Work in mathematics classes: The context of students’ thinking during instruction. Educational Psychologist, 23, 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ely, M., Vinz, R., Anzul, M., & Downing, M. (1997). On writing qualitative research: Living by words. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  28. Ensor, P. (2001). From preservice mathematics teacher education to beginning teaching: A study in recontextualizing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(3), 296–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Erikson, F. (1977). Some approaches to inquiry in school community ethnography. Anthropology and Education, 8(2), 58-62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hashweh, M. Z. (1986). An exploratory study of teacher knowledge and teaching: The effects of science teachers’ knowledge of subject matter and their conceptions of learning on their teaching (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 3672A.Google Scholar
  32. Hashweh, M. (1987). Effects of subject matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(2), 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1993). Interactional tasks, classroom discourse, and students’ learning in second-grade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 393–425.Google Scholar
  34. Krieger, S. (1991). Social science and the self: Personal essays on an art form. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Laborde, L. (1989). Audacity and reason: French research in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(3), 31-36.Google Scholar
  36. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29–63.Google Scholar
  37. Lampert, M. (1992). Practices and problems in teaching authentic mathematics. In F. Oser, D. Andreas & J. Patry (Eds.), Effective and responsible teaching: The new synthesis (pp. 295–314). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  38. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. Ann Arbor, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lampert, M., & Ball, D. (1998). Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lampert, M., & Ball, D. (1999). Aligning teacher education with contemporary K-12 reform visions. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 33–53). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  41. Leinhardt, G., & Smith, D. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics education research. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 19–44). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
  43. Lester, F. K., Jr., & Carpenter, T. (2001). The research preparation of doctoral students in mathematics education. In R. E. Reys & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), One field, many paths: U.S. doctoral programs in mathematics education (CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, Vol. 9, pp. 63–66). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
  44. Lester, F. K., Jr., & Lambdin, D. V. (in press). From amateur to professional: The emergence and maturation of the U.S. mathematics education research community. In G. M. A. Stanic & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.). A history of school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  45. Lester, F. K., Jr., & Wiliam, D. (2002). On the purpose of mathematics education research: Making productive contributions to policy and practice. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 489-506). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  46. Lingefjärd, T., & Dahland, G. (Eds.). (1998). Research in mathematics education: A report from a follow-up conference after PME 1997. Gothenburg, Sweden: Gothenburg University.Google Scholar
  47. Lubienski, S. (2000). Problem solving as a means towards mathematics for all: An exploratory look through the class lens. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 454–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McIntosh, J. A., & Crosswhite, F. J. (1973). A survey of doctoral programs in mathematics education. Columbus, OH: ERIC Information Analysis Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education.Google Scholar
  49. Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Metz, M. (2001). Intellectual border crossing in graduate school. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. National Academy of Education. (1999). Recommendations regarding research priorities: An advisory report to the National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board. New York: Author.Google Scholar
  53. Page, R. (2001). Reshaping graduate preparation in educational research methods: One school’s experience. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pallas, A. (2001). Preparing education doctoral students for epistemological diversity. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 6-11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pea, R. (1999). New Media Communications Forums for Improving Education Research and Practice. In E. C. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.). Issues in Education Research: Problems and Possibilities. Jossey Bass: San Francisco, (pp. 336–370).Google Scholar
  56. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reys, R., & Kilpatrick, J. (Eds.) (2000). One field, many paths: U.S. doctoral programs in mathematics education (CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, Vol. 9). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
  58. Ruthven, K. (1990). The influence of graphic calculator use on translation from graphic to symbolic form. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21, 431–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schoenfeld, A. (1999). The core, the canon, and the development of research skills: Issues in the preparation of education researchers. In E. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities (pp. 166–202). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  60. Schwab, J. J. (1958). Inquiry and the reading process. Journal of General Education, 11, 72–82.Google Scholar
  61. Schwab, J. J. (1978). Education and the structure of the disciplines. In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberal education: Selected essays of Joseph J. Schwab (pp. 229–272). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1961)Google Scholar
  62. Shulman, L. S. (1997). Disciplines of inquiry in education: A new overview. In R. M. Jaeger (Ed.), Complementary methods for research in education (pp. 3–19). Washington DC: American Education Research Association.Google Scholar
  63. Shulman, L. S. (1999). Professing educational scholarship. In E. C. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research: problems and possibilities (pp. 159–165). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  64. Sierpinska, A., & Kilpatrick, J. (Eds.) (1998). Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity. An ICMI Study. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  65. Stein, M. K., Grover, B., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 455–488.Google Scholar
  66. Steinberg, R., Haymore, J., & Marks, R. (1985, April). Teachers’ knowledge and content structuring in mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  67. Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1997, September). Understanding and improving mathematics instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 14–21.Google Scholar
  68. Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  69. Stodolsky, S. S. (1988). The subject matters: Classroom activity in math and social studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  70. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wilson, S. M., & Wineburg, S. S. (1988). Peering at history through different lenses: The role of disciplinary perspectives in teaching history. Teachers College Record, 89, 525–539.Google Scholar
  72. Zeichner, K. M., & Tabachnik, B. R. (1981). Are the effects of university teacher education ‘washed out’ by school experience? Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jo Boaler
    • 1
  • Deborah Loewenberg Ball
    • 2
  • Ruhama Even
    • 3
  1. 1.Stanford UniversityUSA
  2. 2.University of MichiganUSA
  3. 3.Weizmann Institute of ScienceUSA

Personalised recommendations