ECSCW 2003 pp 119-138 | Cite as

Informing the Development of Calendar Systems for Domestic Use

  • Andy Crabtree
  • Terry Hemmings
  • Tom Rodden
  • John Mariani


This paper contributes to the design of Groupware Calendar Systems (GCSs) for use in domestic life. We consider a number of ethnographic studies of calendar use in domestic circumstances to illuminate the design space and inform design reasoning. GCSs have been employed in the workplace for sometime and have been informed by studies of ‘calendar work’. As design moves out of the workplace and into the home, the unique demands of domestic use now need to be considered. Existing insights into calendar work are restricted to the workplace however, and are constrained by analytic taxonomies. In the absence of first-hand knowledge of calendar use in domestic settings, we suspend the use of taxonomies and describe the ‘interpretive work’ implicated in calendar work in order to explicate real world practices of calendar use in domestic life. These novel studies draw attention to a corpus of accountable work-practices that impact directly on design. In particular, they emphasize the need for design to consider how the physical and the digital may be merged to support collaboration ‘anywhere, anytime’; the necessity of devising negotiation protocols supporting computer-mediated communication; and the development of collaborative access models and interaction techniques to support data sharing.


Computer Support Cooperative Work Negotiation Protocol Domestic Life Domestic Setting Distinct Annotation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, R. J. (1994) “Representations and requirements: the value of ethnography in system design”, Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 9, pp. 151–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bellotti, V. and Smith, I. (2000) “Informing the design of an information management system with iterative fieldwork”, Proceedings of the 2000 Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 227–237, New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  3. Button, G. and Harper, R. (1996) “The relevance of ‘work-practice’ for design”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol. 4(4), pp. 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crabtree, A., O’Brien, J., Nichols, D., Rouncefield, M., and Twidale, M. (2000) “Ethnomethodologically informed ethnography and information systems design”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 51(7), pp. 666–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T. and Rodden, T. (2002a) “Pattern-based support for interactive design in domestic settings”, Proceedings of the 2002 Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, London: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  6. Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T. and Rodden, T. (2002b) “Coordinate displays in the home”, CSCW Workshop on Public, Community and Situated Displays, Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New Orleans: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  7. Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T. and Rodden, T. (2003a) “Supporting communication within domestic settings”, Proceedings of the 2003 Home Oriented Informatics and Telematics Conference, Newport, California: International Federation for Information Processing.Google Scholar
  8. Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T. and Rodden, T. (2003b) “The social construction of displays: coordinate displays and ecologically distributed networks”, to appear in Public, Community and Situated Displays (eds. O’Hara, K. et al.), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Crabtree, A. (2003) “The social organization of communication in domestic settings”, to appear in Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the International Institute of Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, 2nd–4th July, Manchester: IIEMCAGoogle Scholar
  10. Dourish, P., Bellotti, V., Mackay, W. and Ma, C-Y. (1993) “Information and context”, Proceedings of the 1993 ACM Conference on Organizational Computing Systems, pp. 42–51, Milpitas, California: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dourish. P (2001) “Seeking a foundation for context-aware computing”, Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 16, pp. 2–3.Google Scholar
  12. Dourish, P. (2002) What We Talk About When We Talk About Context? University of California, Irvine: Department of Information and Computer Science, Scholar
  13. Ehrlich, S.F. (1987) “Social and psychological factors influencing the design of office communication systems”, Proceedings of the 1987 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems and Graphical Interface, pp. 323–329, Toronto: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  14. Garfmkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Garfinkel, H. (1986) “Introduction”, Ethnomethodological Studies of Work, vii–viii, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  16. Garfinkel, H. (2002) Ethnomethodology’s Program, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  17. Greif, I. and Sarin, S. (1987) “Data sharing in group work”, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 5(2), pp. 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kelley, J.F. and Chapanis, A. (1982) “How professional persons keep their calendars: implications for computerization”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, vol. 55, pp. 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kincaid, C.M. and Dupont, P.B. (1985) “Electronic calendars in the office”, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 3(1), pp. 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lauer, R.H. (1981) Temporal Man: The Meaning and Uses of Social Time, New York: Praegger Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Mateas, M., Salvador, T., Scholtz, J. and Sorensen, D. (1996) “Engineering ethnography in the home”, Proceedings of the 1996 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 283–284, Vancouver: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  22. O’Brien, J. and Rodden, T. (1997) “Interactive systems in domestic environments”, Proceedings of the 1997 Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 247–259, Amsterdam: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  23. O’Brien, J., Rodden, T., Rouncefield, M. and Hughes, J.A., (1999) “At home with the technology”, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 6(3), pp. 282–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Palen, L. (1998) Calendars on the New Frontier, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
  25. Palen, L. (1999) “Social, individual and technological issues for groupware calendar systems”, Proceedings of the 1999 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 17–24, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  26. Palen, L. and Grudin, J. (2002) Discretionary Adoption of Group Support Software, Scholar
  27. Rouncefield, M. et al. (1994) “Working with ‘constant interruption’”, Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 275–286, Chapel Hill, North Carolina: ACM Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ryle, G. (1971) “The thinking of thoughts”, University Lectures No. 18, Canada: University of Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
  29. Shapiro, D. (1994) “The limits of ethnography”, Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 417–428, Chapel Hill, North Carolina: ACM Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sharrock, W.W. and Button, G. (1991) “The social actor: social action in real time”, Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences (ed. Button, G.), pp. 137–175, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Tullio, J., Goecks, J., Mynatt, E.D. and Nguyen, D.H. (2002) “Augmenting shared personal calendars”, Proceedings of the 15 th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 11–20, Paris, France: ACM Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Venkatesh, A. (1985) “A conceptualization of the household/technology interaction”, Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 12, pp. 189–194.Google Scholar
  33. Venkatesh, A. (1996) “Computers and other interactive technologies for the home”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 39(12), pp. 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Venkatesh, A., Stolzoff, N., Shih, E. and Mazumdar, S. (2001) “The home of the future: an ethnographic study of new information technologies in the home”, Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 28, pp. 88–96.Google Scholar
  35. Zerubavel, E. (1981) Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andy Crabtree
    • 1
  • Terry Hemmings
    • 1
  • Tom Rodden
    • 1
  • John Mariani
    • 2
  1. 1.The School of Computer Science & ITThe University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  2. 2.Computing DepartmentLancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations