ECSCW 2003 pp 199-218 | Cite as

Learning and living in the ‘New office’

  • Eva Bjerrum
  • Susanne Bødker


‘Knowledge sharing’ and ‘learning’ are terms often connected with the ‘New office’, the “modern” open office space. Work in these settings becomes more and more distributed, mobile and characterised by temporary constellations of collaborators. The workers are mobile and work wherever they are. Based on nine case studies, this paper describes how the ‘New office,’ intended to support learning and peripheral participation often gets directly counterproductive to this purpose. It lacks places to dwell and return to, places to meet coincidentally, shared artefacts and possibilities of leaving traces of current and past activities. These problems are due to a combination of problematic archi?tecture and insufficient technology, and not least to insufficient design processes, where the actual needs of the people in the organisation are rarely considered, and where peo?ple are rarely involved in the design and introduction processes. Through exploratory design we have pursued ways of improving legitimate peripheral participation, through architecture, physical artefacts and materials in the rooms as well as through virtual exten?sions of these artefacts, in order to explore alternatives and raise further research ques?tions regarding ‘the new office’.


Knowledge Sharing Office Building Meeting Room Office Space Computer Support Cooperative Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baldry, C., Bain, P. & Taylor, P. (1998). ‘Bright satanic offices’: intensification, control and team taylorism. In Thompson, P. & Warhurst C. Workplaces of the future, Macmillan, pp. 163–183.Google Scholar
  2. Bertelsen, O.W. and Bødker, S. (2001). Cooperation in massively distributed information spaces. In ECSCW 2001: Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  3. Bjerrum, E. & Brinkman, S. (2001). New Ways of working i Århus Amt. Alexandra Instituttet.Google Scholar
  4. Bjerrum, E & Nielsen, O. (in press). Bliver man lidt småscer af at have eget kontor? Jyllands Postens Forlag.Google Scholar
  5. Bødker, S. & Christiansen, E. (2002). Lost and Found in Flexibility, IRIS 2002, CD-ROMGoogle Scholar
  6. Bødker, S. & Christiansen, E. (in preparation). IT-support for social awareness: Why, how and where?, in preparation for journal publication.Google Scholar
  7. Bødker, S. & Petersen, M.G. (2000). Design for learning in use, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 12, pp. 61–80.Google Scholar
  8. Bødker, S., Krogh, P & Petersen, M.G. (2001). The interactive design collaboratorium. In Hirose, M. (ed.) Human Computer Interaction. Interact’ 01, IOS Press, pp 51–58.Google Scholar
  9. Bødker, S., Kristensen, J.F., Nielsen, C. & Sperschneider, W. (in preparation). Technology and design work on the boundaries.Google Scholar
  10. Büscher, M., Mogensen, P. & Shapiro, D. (2001). Spaces of Practice. In W. Prinz et al. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 139–158. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Duffy, F. (2000). New Ways of Working-Know Thyself COWI Aarhus 2/11, unpublished lecture.Google Scholar
  12. Ehn, P. (1988). Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Falköping: Arbetslivscentrum/Almqvist & Wiksell International, Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
  14. Harrison, S. & Dourish, P. (1996). Re-Place-ing Space: The role of place and space in collaborative systems, Proceedings of ACM CSCW’96 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 67–76.Google Scholar
  15. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mosbech K. (2001). Oral presentation at “Banestyrelsen” Copenhagen. December 2001.Google Scholar
  17. Myerson, J. & Ross, P. (1999). The creative office, Laurence King Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Nardi, B, Whittaker, S. & Schwarz, H. (2000). It’s Not What You Know, It’s Who You Know: Work in the Information Age, First Monday Volume 5, Number 5
  19. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H., (1995). The knowledge-Creating Company, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Olson, J. Covi, L., Rocco, E., Miller, W. & Allie P. (1998). A room of your own: what would it take to help remote groups work as well as collocated groups? Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems, ACM Press New York, NY, pp. 279–280.Google Scholar
  21. Raymond, S. & Cunliffe, R. (1997). Tomorrow’s Office, E&FN Spon.Google Scholar
  22. Rekimoto, J. (1997). Pick-and-Drop: A Direct Manipulation Technique for Multiple Computer Environments. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, p.31–39Google Scholar
  23. Robinson, M. (1993). Design for Unanticipated Use. In G. deMichaelis & C. Simone (eds.), Pro?ceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Kluwer, pp. 187–202.Google Scholar
  24. Schmidt, K. & Simone, C. (1996). Coordination Mechanisms: Towards a Conceptual Foundation of CSCW Systems Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1996 v.5 n.2/3 p. 155–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sennett, R. (1998). The Corrosion of Character. The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. W.W.Norton and Co.Google Scholar
  26. Suchman, L. & Wynn, E. H. (1984). Procedures and Problems in the Office. Office: Technology and People 2,2 (Jan 1984), 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Suchman, L. A. (1993). Centers of Coordination: A Case and Some Themes. Presented at the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Discourse, Tools and Reasoning, Lucca, Italy, November 2–7.Google Scholar
  29. Suchman, L. A. (1996). Constituting shared workspaces. In Engeström, Y. & Middleton, D. (eds.). Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge University Press, pp. 35–60.Google Scholar
  30. Teasley, S. Covi, L., Krishnan, M.S. & Olson, J (2000). How does radical collocation help a team succeed? Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM Press New York, NY, pp. 339–346.Google Scholar
  31. Trigg, R, & Bødker, S (1994). From Imlementation to design: Tailoring and the emergence of systematization in CSCW, in Futura, R. & Neuwirth, C: Proceedings og CSCW 94, ACM press, pp. 45–54.Google Scholar
  32. Wagner, I., Buscher, M., Mogensen, P. Shapiro, D. (1999) Spaces for creating context & awareness — designing a collaborative virtual work space for (landscape) architects. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction v.2 p. 283–287.Google Scholar
  33. Worthington J., Duffy F., Greenberg S., Myerson J., Powell K. & Thompson T. (1998).The architecture of DEGW, Birkhaüser VerlagGoogle Scholar
  34. Yates, J. (1989). Control through Communication, John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Bjerrum
    • 1
  • Susanne Bødker
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for New Ways of WorkingUniversity of AarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations