Mössbauer Spectroscopy pp 231-238 | Cite as
Investigations on Structure and Transformation of Some Organometallic Compounds in Solution
Abstract
Earlier NMR investigations revealed that the tetrameric [Me3SnL]4 compound [Me = methyl group, CH3; L = cupferronato anion, PhN2(O)O−] falls apart to monomeric units in chloroform solution. Comparison of Mössbauer spectra of the crystalline and the dissolved form indicated a minor change in structure, but not clearly. From the four possible structures in solution, two could be excluded by the help of partial quadrupole splitting (PQS) model calculations. The final decision between the remaining two possible monomeric structures was made by IR spectroscopy. The authors cite and, using PQS calculations, explain the case of another compound, [Me2N(CH2)3]2SnF2, the two structural isomers of which had been found to have very similar spectra in spite of a seemingly great difference between the positions of the ligands.
Key words
partial quadrupole splitting point charge model organotin(IV) cation cupferronato ligand coordination chemistryPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Karpati, S. et al., to be published.Google Scholar
- 2.Pieper, N., Klaus-Mrestani, C., Schürmann, M., Jurkschat, K., Biesemans, M., Verbruggen, I., Martins, J. C. and Willem, R., Organometallics 16 (1997), 1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Jurkschat, K. et al., to be published.Google Scholar
- 4.Barbieri, R., Pellerito, L. and Huber, F., Inorg. Chim. Acta 30 (1978), L321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Bancroft, G. M., Kumar Das, V. G., Sham, T. K. and Clark, M. G., J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. (1976), 643.Google Scholar
- 6.Clark, M. G., Maddock, A. G. and Platt, R. H., J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. (1972), 281.Google Scholar
- 7.Maddock, A., Mössbauer Spectroscopy Principles and Applications, Horwood, Chichester, 1997.Google Scholar
- 8.Jurkschat, K., Tzschach, A., Weichmann, H., Rajczy, P., Mostafa, M. A., Korecz, L. and Burger, K., Inorg. Chim. Acta 179 (1991), 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Davies, H. G. and Smith, P. J., In: G. Wilkinson, F. Gordon, A. Stone and E. W. Abel (eds), Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry, Vol. 2, Pergamon Press, 1982, p. 523.Google Scholar
- 10.Deák, A., Venter, M., Kálmán, A., Párkányi, L., Radics, L. and Haiduc, I., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2000), 127.Google Scholar
- 11.Deák, A., Radics, L., Kálmán, A., Párkányi, L. and Haiduc, I., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2001), 2849.Google Scholar
- 12.Nagy, L., Korecz, L., Kiricsi, I., Zsikla, L. and Burger, K., Struct. Chem. 2 (1991), 231.Google Scholar
- 13.Deák, A., Haiduc, I., Párkányi, L., Venter, M. and Kálmán, A., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (1999), 1593.Google Scholar
- 14.Cunningham, D., Kelly, L. A., Molloy, K. C. and Zuckerman, J. J., Inorg. Chem. 21 (1982), 1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Silvestru, C., Haiduc, I., Klima, S., Thewalt, U., Gielen, M. and Zuckerman, J. J., J. Organomet. Chem. 327 (1987), 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Párkányi, L., Kálmán, A., Deák, A., Venter, M. and Haiduc, I., Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2 (1999), 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar