Hyper-Reflexivity — a New Danger for the Counter-Movements

  • Hilary Rose
Part of the Sociology of the Sciences a Yearbook book series (SOSC, volume 3)

Abstract

I don’t know if anyone reads straight through an edited collection of papers such as this volume, or whether, as I confess I usually do, they dip in and out, attracted by a modish title or the author or subject one has some familiarity with already. But to read this book from the beginning is to experience a constellation of voices, some writing directly out of their own personal and subjective experience, all commenting, analysing, attempting to apply the tools of sociology to the phenomenon. Indeed, when we developed the idea of a book on counter-movements in the sciences and invited contributions to it, this was what we anticipated. For the issues raised by such a title, and the difficulties of those trapped within the contradictions of science as it is practised in this society, are multifaceted. We recognised from the beginning that this book would inevitably be as much a declaration of the experience as an analysis of its meaning.

Keywords

Social Relation Free Society Dialectical Materialism Whooping Crane Physics Profession 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    Indeed the writing is, to use Alvin Gouldner’s title, For Sociology, Penguin, 1975.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.R. Ravetz, Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems, Oxford Univ. Press., 1971.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hilary Rose and Steven Rose, The Incorporation of Science’. In H. Rose and S. Rose (Eds.), The Political Economy of Science, Macmillan, 1976.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. D. Bernal, Marx and Science, Marxism Today Series, 9, Lawrence and Wishart, 1952.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. D. Bernal, The Social Function of Science, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1939.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hilary Rose and Steven Rose, Science and Society, Allen Lane, 1969.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ruth Hubbard, Introductory chapter to Hilary Rose and Steven Rose (Eds.), Ideology of/in the Natural Sciences, Schenkman, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. J. Yaes, The time has come to abandon the pumps and run for the life-boats — Reflections on leaving the Physics Profession to Study Medicine’, Talk presented at the Penn. State Conference, August, Am. Inst. Physics, 1978.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. P. Snow, The Two Cultures, Cambridge Univ. Press., 1959.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Carveth, The Disembodied Dialectic: A Psychoanalytic Critique of Sociological Relativism’, Theory and Society 4, 73–101 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Heller, ‘On the New Adventures of the Dialectic’, Telos, pp. 134–142, 1977.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hilary Rose and Steven Rose, ‘The Metaphor Goes into Orbit: Science is Not All Social Relations’, Science Bulletin.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Althusser, For Marx, Allen Lane, 1965.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Wrong, The Over Socialised Conception of Man in Modern Sociology’, Am. Soc. Rev. 26, 183 - 193 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Heller, op. cit., 1977.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    I am much indebted to Carveth’s paper for this insight into the underlying ‘irreality and chaos’ embedded within the new sociological, or as he rightly terms it,’ socio¬logists reductionism’, pp. 10, 197.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Carveth, op. cit., p. 197.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Feyerabend, Against Method, New Left Books, 1975.Google Scholar
  19. P. Feyerabend, Science in a Free Society, New Left Books, 1978.Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    P. Feyerabend, Science in a Free Society, New Left Books, 1978.Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    T. Adorno, The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, 1972.Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    P. Feyerabend, Science in a Free Society, New Left Books, 1978.Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    L. Hodgkin, ‘A Note on Scientism’, Radical Science Journal 5, 8 (1977).Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    B. Barnes, Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974.Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    R. Young, ‘Science is Social Relations’, Radical Science Journal 5, 65–129 (1977).Google Scholar
  26. 25.
    A. Sohn-Rethel, Mental and Manual Labour, Macmillan, 1976.Google Scholar
  27. 26.
    A. Heller, op. cit., 1977.Google Scholar
  28. 27.
    Mao Tse-Tung, ‘On Practice’, July, 1937. Selected Works of Mao Tse-Tung, People’s Publishing House, pp. 295 - 305, 1965.Google Scholar
  29. 28.
    M. Young, ‘Taking Sides Against the Probable: Problems of Relativism and Com-mitment in Teaching and the Sociology of Knowledge’, Educational Review 25, (3) 221 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hilary Rose
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BradfordUK

Personalised recommendations